1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
I get it, I do. But by *mentioning it at all*, it purposely leaves a Talmudic loophole and pushes the Overton window ever further toward communism. Trannies are not acceptable in any capacity. It’s not enough to “stop federal funding for child tranny mutilations.” It’s not enough to “stop funding drag shows for children.” The administration EXPLICITLY SUPPORTS LGB, removing only the T. It’s explicitly saying that dykes and fags and scaredy-gays are “normal” and “acceptable.” *And no one says a goddamned thing about it* because they got their “victory” with trannies†.
It took a hundred years for the jews to subvert our countries as far as they have. It might take at least that to swing the pendulum the other way, and even then: the damage might have been done by that point. I take this as a step in the right direction: even though the one doing the stepping is a shabbos goy mongoloid.
So all the others are fine, got it. And queers are fine, got it.
You are crying about children being protected from troons.
https://files.catbox.moe/9ofcqg.jpg
† child-seeking trannies *only*