1 year ago9 points(+0/-0/+9Score on mirror)1 child
National socialism was tried and was successful. It took one of the most decimated economies/countries (Weimar Republic Germany) in the world and turned it into one of the strongest, most prosperous (Germany under NSDAP) in about 5 years.
By that criteria every form of government has failed; no government or economic system has lasted indefinitely. Failing eventually (particularly due to most world powers simultaneous attacking financially and physically) and failing from the start seems like a pretty big differentiation. National Socialism, inarguably, was a great success before the jews declared war on them and proceeded to send their attack dogs to crush them.
Th' guy in th' image arguing with boomer man is not calling for national socialism to be tried, he is merely pointing out that National Socialism is different from Marx's communism.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Do you think we still have a republic? That crippled commie FDR twisted it into a weird socialist hybrid back in the 30s. And the opposition party was also infiltrated and subverted by socialists, neoconservatism is a branch of trotskyist socialism. The modern west in general is currently ruled under globalist socialism. It may not be ideal, but replacing the globalism with nationalism would be an improvement.
So let's try it again. Except this time, we'll call it "national socialism"!
Th' guy in th' image arguing with boomer man is not calling for national socialism to be tried, he is merely pointing out that National Socialism is different from Marx's communism.