You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)
I disagree. You can make statistical statements about groups which impart blame.
For example: Black Africans have lower IQs than Whites, therefore Black migrants are responsible for lower test scores in White schools.
It's not accurate to say "That guy is Black, therefore he is low IQ" because, even though you have a higher chance of being correct than if he were White, you just don't know.
But that's completely different for statements about Jews. You absolutely can say "Jews subvert systems created by others in order to benefit their own people" because that's what Jews believe by definition. You can say "Jews killed Jesus" not only because they did, but because, due to what Jews continue to believe, they would do so again.
That's the hymie shuffle: trying to make people think they're just a group of related individuals, rather than members of a coherent ideology, which just so happens to view every non-believer as a potential target for enslavement.
For example: Black Africans have lower IQs than Whites, therefore Black migrants are responsible for lower test scores in White schools.
It's not accurate to say "That guy is Black, therefore he is low IQ" because, even though you have a higher chance of being correct than if he were White, you just don't know.
But that's completely different for statements about Jews. You absolutely can say "Jews subvert systems created by others in order to benefit their own people" because that's what Jews believe by definition. You can say "Jews killed Jesus" not only because they did, but because, due to what Jews continue to believe, they would do so again.
That's the hymie shuffle: trying to make people think they're just a group of related individuals, rather than members of a coherent ideology, which just so happens to view every non-believer as a potential target for enslavement.