Zion Don bends the knee
(twitter.com)
He's making israel great again! Just trust the H1B1 process pede!
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
11 comments:
13
2 months ago
13 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+13Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
It’s incredibly tyrannical because Section 3(c) gives the Marxist government the power to [18 U.S.C. 241](https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section241&num=0&edition=prelim) use which allows them to arrest you for saying things that may oppress or intimidate Jews.
> The Attorney General is encouraged to employ appropriate civil-rights enforcement authorities, such as 18 U.S.C. 241, to combat anti-Semitism.
Earlier today I saw a [video of a Chinese taxi driver reporting tourists to the authorities](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NhGXjwWV_A) because they said something that the CCP wouldn’t like. The driver claimed he was “fearful” because they asked him what he thought about the CCP. I wondered how long before we reach that point, seems I got my answer.
The legal definition of intimidation is an act that causes a person to be fearful or feel endangered. 18 U.S.C. 241 criminalizes speech between people that may cause a person to feel intimidated when exercising their civil rights **without said person being present**.
> If two or more persons **conspire** to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same
But this EO is not about civil rights, it’s about anti-semitism and using this law to combat what the US perceives to be anti-Semitic. According to the [Department of State,](https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/) antisemitism is:
> Antisemitism is **a certain perception of Jews,** which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities
> Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to **blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms ** and action, and **employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.**
> Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, **the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.**
Using this law to combat “antisemitism” is criminalizing speech that may offend a Jew even if the Jew is not present to hear you. It applies fines and up to ten years in jail.
Note, it also targets “disguises”.
> If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
Per the EO, this outlaws any disguise or organized movement that may be deemed “antisemitic” or used to participate in activities that offends a Jew.
In the same section, the EO calls for institutions to report students so that they may be removed if they are aliens.
>shall include in their reports recommendations for familiarizing institutions of higher education with the grounds for inadmissibility under [8 U.S. Code § 1182](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182) so that such institutions may monitor for and report activities by alien students and staff relevant to those grounds and for ensuring that such reports about aliens lead, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to investigations and, if warranted, actions to remove such aliens.
The law concerns aliens with a health risk or guilty of a crime (drug dealers, traffickers, committing misdemeanors and felonies, etc.) not the act of protesting or making a political statement. Yet the EO demands this law be used to “combat antisemitism”.
Considering that the US defines antisemitism as statements, images, and stereotypes about Jews, this EO effectively criminalizes speech and free assembly that they don’t like whereas previous antisemitism laws were modifiers of an existing crime.
The question now is, will it be enforced?
> The Attorney General is encouraged to employ appropriate civil-rights enforcement authorities, such as 18 U.S.C. 241, to combat anti-Semitism.
Earlier today I saw a [video of a Chinese taxi driver reporting tourists to the authorities](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NhGXjwWV_A) because they said something that the CCP wouldn’t like. The driver claimed he was “fearful” because they asked him what he thought about the CCP. I wondered how long before we reach that point, seems I got my answer.
The legal definition of intimidation is an act that causes a person to be fearful or feel endangered. 18 U.S.C. 241 criminalizes speech between people that may cause a person to feel intimidated when exercising their civil rights **without said person being present**.
> If two or more persons **conspire** to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same
But this EO is not about civil rights, it’s about anti-semitism and using this law to combat what the US perceives to be anti-Semitic. According to the [Department of State,](https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/) antisemitism is:
> Antisemitism is **a certain perception of Jews,** which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities
> Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to **blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms ** and action, and **employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.**
> Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, **the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.**
Using this law to combat “antisemitism” is criminalizing speech that may offend a Jew even if the Jew is not present to hear you. It applies fines and up to ten years in jail.
Note, it also targets “disguises”.
> If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
Per the EO, this outlaws any disguise or organized movement that may be deemed “antisemitic” or used to participate in activities that offends a Jew.
In the same section, the EO calls for institutions to report students so that they may be removed if they are aliens.
>shall include in their reports recommendations for familiarizing institutions of higher education with the grounds for inadmissibility under [8 U.S. Code § 1182](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182) so that such institutions may monitor for and report activities by alien students and staff relevant to those grounds and for ensuring that such reports about aliens lead, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to investigations and, if warranted, actions to remove such aliens.
The law concerns aliens with a health risk or guilty of a crime (drug dealers, traffickers, committing misdemeanors and felonies, etc.) not the act of protesting or making a political statement. Yet the EO demands this law be used to “combat antisemitism”.
Considering that the US defines antisemitism as statements, images, and stereotypes about Jews, this EO effectively criminalizes speech and free assembly that they don’t like whereas previous antisemitism laws were modifiers of an existing crime.
The question now is, will it be enforced?
> Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.
Oh wow, it's probably as bad as a hatred of pedophiles and rapists. It's not ok to hate them, because """hate""" bad!
> toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities
Add to the list the absolute jewish control of media, the finance system, the central banking system, most of the politicians... a lot of things that may not be criticized!
> Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity.
Oh but we can "hate" every other ethnicity, nation or group, including our own. But iSRAEL IS OFF LIMITS GOYS!
> However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
A little difficult to separate the art from the artist... or the rape from the rapist. Sorry, I see filthy kikes doing kike things again, I assume the fact they are kikes is essential to the topic.
> Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.”
Which they do... and it is correct to blame them for what they are doing. It would be false to blame them even though they are not doing it, just as it would be false to not blame them when they are doing it.
> and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Which happen to apply a lot. Stereotypes is just a derogatory term for "pattern."
> the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
It can be literally looked up. These "antisemites" have done exactly that. It is impossible to point it out without having rabid jews send ZOG at your throat.
> this EO effectively criminalizes speech
Welcome to the EU. A tyrannical entity placed over Europe most Europeans hate. And politicians can wander all about, even to jail, and return in higher positions within the EU as before. The EU hosts the most vile, corrupt, leftist parasites in the world.
> whereas previous antisemitism laws were modifiers of an existing crime.
Which btw also goes against the very idea of "equality." A shitty idea, but even its proponents are hypocrites.
> The question now is, will it be enforced?
Oh don't worry about that. Plenty of rabid ZOG jew-cock-suckers and leftists around to pursue that. It will be an increasingly bigger problem, and people will start to wonder "hmm, why do this extreme breach of our natural civil rights to protect jews? let's look into that!"
Oh wow, it's probably as bad as a hatred of pedophiles and rapists. It's not ok to hate them, because """hate""" bad!
> toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities
Add to the list the absolute jewish control of media, the finance system, the central banking system, most of the politicians... a lot of things that may not be criticized!
> Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity.
Oh but we can "hate" every other ethnicity, nation or group, including our own. But iSRAEL IS OFF LIMITS GOYS!
> However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.
A little difficult to separate the art from the artist... or the rape from the rapist. Sorry, I see filthy kikes doing kike things again, I assume the fact they are kikes is essential to the topic.
> Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.”
Which they do... and it is correct to blame them for what they are doing. It would be false to blame them even though they are not doing it, just as it would be false to not blame them when they are doing it.
> and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Which happen to apply a lot. Stereotypes is just a derogatory term for "pattern."
> the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
It can be literally looked up. These "antisemites" have done exactly that. It is impossible to point it out without having rabid jews send ZOG at your throat.
> this EO effectively criminalizes speech
Welcome to the EU. A tyrannical entity placed over Europe most Europeans hate. And politicians can wander all about, even to jail, and return in higher positions within the EU as before. The EU hosts the most vile, corrupt, leftist parasites in the world.
> whereas previous antisemitism laws were modifiers of an existing crime.
Which btw also goes against the very idea of "equality." A shitty idea, but even its proponents are hypocrites.
> The question now is, will it be enforced?
Oh don't worry about that. Plenty of rabid ZOG jew-cock-suckers and leftists around to pursue that. It will be an increasingly bigger problem, and people will start to wonder "hmm, why do this extreme breach of our natural civil rights to protect jews? let's look into that!"
Toast message