New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I posted "jews are the whole reason that we smoke in the first place" on NuVoat, and was asked for a cite. I replied that, (not so) curiously, no direct citation exists, but I worked this out through research. I welcome you to examine it for any errors.

---------------

The British East India Trading Company is what built the British empire, but it was largely isolated from the King. It kept it's own armies, and had agreements where it's jurisdiction was (generally) everything outside of Britain, while the King had jurisdiction inside Britain. The British East Indian Trading Company did not allow jews to hold positions inside of it.

The primary competition to the British EITC was jews, who ran their own trading outfits based out of (what we now know as) the Netherlands, which was originally part of Spain. Literally, the Netherlands exists because Jews who didn't want to leave Spain when expelled ran to what is now the Netherlands, caused [the 80 years war](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighty_Years%27_War), then took 'the Dutch Republic', as it was called, for their own.

The entire economy of the Dutch Republic was trading. While Amsterdam was originally the main hub for Sugar importing to Europe (through the Dutch EITC, a direct competitor to the British EITC which was literally simply bought by jews), by 1650, sugar took a backseat to tobacco, which became the jewish Dutch Republic's greatest import, and **Europe's first Tobacco processing center was created in Amsterdam.** In fact, [Tobacco was so lucrative for the jews that the money they made off of Tobacco literally caused the Dutch 'Golden Age'.](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-72368-6_8) As a fun fact, [it should be no surprise that the same Dutch EITC literally brought the first jews to America in 1654,](https://jewishcurrents.org/june-3-the-dutch-east-india-company) where they would establish New Amsterdam and larger New Netherlands, now known as the insufferable New York / New Jersey area. This is, of course, the same area and same jews behind rum distillation, if you have been following my posts on the jews behind alcohol consumption.

And what did the jews do with a bunch of tobacco and no consumers? Manufacture consumers, of course. As with American women in the 1910s, smoking was considered disgustingly unattractive, and jews spent the next 50 years pushing tobacco on the rest of Europe. Reminder that their primary opposition was King James VI and I, who, try as he might, couldn't stop the jews from pushing tobacco in his territories (please see his rather humorous ['Counterblaste to Tobacco').](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Counterblaste_to_Tobacco)

In general, any time something addictive is introduced to modern society, jews were behind it. Jews literally require their wares to be addictive, because the addiction makes a country's citizens actually want to disobey their leaders enough to consume. Otherwise, people decide it isn't worth the risk.

Jews introduced us to tea, and later coffee (when they realized that coffee was more addictive, which we now know is due to higher caffeine content), tobacco, hard spirits (originally, Rum), weed, and, though I don't know about us, they introduced China to Opium, which caused a massive destabilization and ended the thousands of years of their dynasty system.

-----------------

Google anything I've typed. I checked every sentence to ensure they are worded in a way that they are easily citable.
You must log in or sign up to comment
30 comments:
14
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 14 points (+1 / -0 / +13Score on mirror ) 1 child
As another fun fact, the British EITC simply having covenants preventing jews from holding positions didn't accomplish much, [as by the 1700s the British EITC had it's first jewish director, Joseph Salvador.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Salvador)

What did he use all of his money/power for? [The 1753 Jew Bill,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jew_Bill_of_1753) which removed all protections against jews in positions of power. It is curiously written as if it 'just' extended citizenship, but jews already had access to society at the citizen's level. Only politics required citizenship, which the bill provided.

You literally can't be nice. When discussing the problems we have had from a historical perspective, you will realize that you literally have to kill them or they will take over your society.
[deleted]
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) Edited 2025-01-29 15:19:42 1 child
Thank you for this informative thread, this is the kind of post I'd like to see on ConPro more often. You're a Legend.
  
So it's safe to say almost every vice introduced to mankind in recent times had a jew behind it, because this is a recurring theme. (See: Alcohol and etc., exception being wine and the blood of Christ.)
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
I'd love to see more of these posts too, but the other guys who used to post them haven't been active in a while (didyouknow, and one other guy I forgot). If you can believe it, even Tallest_skil used to make posts like this many years ago on old Voat.

You are correct that wine and beer are exceptions, both so old that we don't even remember who invented them or when, except they are a core part of the various European identities.

As to vices, it sure looks that way. Every addictive drug, masturbation, pornography, gambling (which is the original jewish scam - some of our earliest records of them show them swindling peasants in the streets with 3 card monte). Hell, even our own (((CIA))) invented doomscrolling, as InQtel, a publicly admitted CIA venture fund, created Facebook through what was originally their 'lifelog' project.

Fun fact, placing echoes around jewish names actually comes from CIA jews - it is how they referred to themselves in declassified documents! BRB uploading cite

EDIT: Nevermind, I've apparently lost it.

Doubleedit: FOUND IT: https://files.catbox.moe/j0l83o.png
[deleted]
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>I'd love to see more of these posts too
 
I tried my best to contribute one with the first and original version of the jew noticing/redpill Megathread. (Anyone can post it nowadays, doesn't have to be me. After all that is the idea, to always have a resource like that available to those new to the jewish problem.)
 
>Fun fact, placing echoes around jewish names actually comes from CIA jews - it is how they referred to themselves in declassified documents! BRB uploading cite
 
Okay, I'm definitely interested in seeing the citation on this one.
 
And this explains why u/TallestSkil tends to use "✡" next to jewish names instead of the parenthesis or echoes as you noted.
 
I.E. ✡Larry Silverstein✡
 
[Remember that time jewtube put echoes around their logo/brand name?](https://i.postimg.cc/vmpfg430/jewtube.jpg)
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+1 / -0 ) 1 child
> Okay, I'm definitely interested in seeing the citation on this one.

Refresh the page, I edited the comment!

> Remember that time jewtube put echoes around their logo/brand name?

Like pottery.
[deleted]
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Thanks, that's rather interesting.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 3 children
Tobacco isn't a bad thing. Cigarettes are, Tobacco isn't.

As an aside though, Tobacco wasn't introduced by the English in the slightest. It was popularized by the Spanish and sold mainly by the Spanish first. Even if we subscribe to the (to me, insane) theory that the conquistadors were jews, all the Tobacco companies in spain were ran by Spaniards. As Spain had just recently gotten rid of the jews. So therefore the people who popularized tobacco in Europe were Spaniards.
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 2 children
found the drug addict.

nicotine (in tobacco) is a harmful drug even if you don't smoke it but instead chew it. Or perhaps a faggot like you does an enema with it.

nicotine is also highly addictive
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Nicotine isn't even the deadly aspect of smoking. Tar is. Nicotine is just a brain stimulant that can make you mildly sick if you use too much of it at the same time. It's also addictive in straight tobacco typically only if you have little self control.

Besides that point, American nicotine pouches are designed to get you hooked to them. The nicotine dosage is low enough that it's easy to build a very high tolerance to them and use and use and use them. Ans then seek out something stronger like vapes or cigarettes because american pouches are fucking awful. Scandinavian ones are the exact opposite. And I bring this up because Sweden and Norway have a life expectancy of 83 years. And half of the people there use smokeless tobacco or nicotine pouches. And when they use it, it's the strongest shit available. They're not dying from it or getting cancer from nicotine. It isn't dangerous. Simple as.
MagnumLife on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
TAR is an acronym - Total Aerosol Residue.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
*backronym.

It used to just be tar as in sticky goo. It was turned into an acronym recently.
MagnumLife on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
No, you are wrong and I'd also wager I have far more experience in the industry than you or anyone else on the site.
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Are you even informed or you just spout mainstream nonsense that the feds fed you?
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Duplicate
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
You! You are the other effortposter I enjoy reading, whose name I forgot.

> Tobacco isn't a bad thing. Cigarettes are, Tobacco isn't.

The Cigarette [as we know it didn't exist until 1847, when the first patent was awarded in Mexico,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigarette), and the first American patent was in 1880. By contrast, people had been warning against tobacco's health damage since at least the early 1600s. Aside from the King's Counterblaste, check out 'Work of Chimney Sweepers', which basically noticed in 1602 that smokers have the same ailments chimney sweeps have.

> Tobacco wasn't introduced by the English in the slightest.

I agree with this statement.

> It was popularized by the Spanish and sold mainly by the Spanish first.

I left this out for clarity, but tobacco did exist in Europe, and was even grown there, but locally grown tobacco apparently tasted intolerably badly and imported tobacco was expensive, and so it was unpopular. Until the strains cultivated in what is now Virginia (there is an argument to be made that Virginia was literally founded to grow Tobacco), (effectively) all consumed tobacco came from Trinidad etc, which made it very expensive.

We don't see the massive expansion in popularity until the Dutch golden era. **EDIT:** The original reason for this post was a cite on jews \*popularizing\* tobacco in Europe, and thus this post is mistitled. I also can't change the title. Sorry.

> Even if we subscribe to the (to me, insane) theory that the conquistadors were jews

Not needed, I assure you.

> As Spain had just recently gotten rid of the jews.

This didn't happen. They were supposed to be expelled, but a large fraction of the Marranos never left, which is why the Inquisition was created in the first place. Marranos who got caught by the Inquisition seceded from Spain and made the Netherlands. It takes more than just telling them they must leave.
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
Another fun fact: Jew Diego d'Aguilar [(citation on him being jewish)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Pereira_d%27Aguilar) held the Austrian Monopoly on Tobacco for a decade or so, [but used 48 Christian nobles as strawmen, so the tobacco industry appeared Christian.](https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/tobacco-trade-and-industries)

The problem is jews intentionally trying to hide their involvement in certain trades. For example, the same article claims elsewhere that, when the Amsterdam tobacco industry was first founded, only 10 of the 30 leading importers were jewish. It becomes impossible to trust these numbers, as jews never overrepresent their involvement in harmful enterprises.
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Yes they all need to be hunted down and exterminated
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
Final fun fact: American women considered smoking highly unattractive to the point of taboo all of the way up into the (((suffragette movement))), where female smoking was tied to the suffragette movement through jew Edward Bernays. They called cigarettes 'Freedom Sticks' lol.
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
isnt the entire feminism movement started by jews?
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They take credit for it, yes. We do know the suffrage movement was entirely jewish, but from my own research, the 3rd wave actually had a goyim stooge leading things. Of course, they shut her down when she led the feminists in protesting child porn in the 'naturalist' movement, rather than generic 'male oppression'. Oops.

Losferwords on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
I think Egyptians were smoking tobacco long before anyone else... also - beer!
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Tabbacky needs to all be packed onto a rocket and sent into the sun.
deleted 1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Duplicate
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
quality post

i always found women smoking to be disgusting

but overall, with or without jew meddling, smoking is something only an imbecile animal does.
JohnTorrington on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Who told you its deadly? The feds? The same that lie about everything lol.

Start by reading: In Defense of Smokers. The Benefits of Natural Tobacco

You can find it on Archive.
alele-opathic on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
> Who told you its deadly? The feds?

People of all positions in society have been warning of the dangers of smoking since we discovered it. At the time of King James' appeal tot he public, smoking popularity had been growing for only about 10 years. It wasn't even fully understood what smoking did, but it was understood even back then, that those who smoked were sicker than those who didn't. Please go check out 'Work of Chimney Sweeps", dating to 1602, where it describes the illnesses of smokers as identical to those of chimney sweeps.

> Start by reading: In Defense of Smokers. The Benefits of Natural Tobacco

I found it, thanks for the reference. [Link here for anyone else.](https://archive.org/details/colby-lauren-a.-in-defense-of-smokers.-the-benefits-of-natural-tobacco/)

So the guy, IMO, does have good arguments when describing the propagandization of anti-smoking material, but his bits fall apart when he tries to argue that there isn't evidence for damage to health.

On page 26, he claims "Kephart insists, however, that it is normally impossible to tell, from autopsy, whether the deceased was or was not a smoker. " However when we go to look for 'Kephart's' actual words, we find nothing. No books, nothing on the internet, no reference in any court proceeding, and not even any evidence the man exists. The original source for any 'Wray Kephart' \*is\* this book. According to Whitepages, there are NO 'Wray Kephart's in the entire continent of America.

**You have to check your sources.** Please remember that, before the pendulum swung back in the anti-smoking direction, originally all propaganda was pro-smoking (e.g. 'blowing smoke' comes from the so-called 'smoke enema', a wannabe-panacea now known to be baseless pro-tobacco propaganda). This author has written a propaganda piece, not an expose.

I'm going to read it cover-to-cover for good measure, but that doesn't look good.
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 2 children
I used to be very pro tobacco, and I still enjoy a smoke from time to time. But it's undeniable, the harms of smoking and their origins.

I will forever be a proponent of nicotine though
wankingisgay on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/19AKKMzzcM/jews-introduced-europeans-to-tob/c/4ZJ1tripbFq
[deleted]
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>I used to be very pro tobacco
 
Same here.
 
>But it's undeniable, the harms of smoking and their origins
 
Yep. I quit smoking years ago, one of best decisions I've ever made. I wish I'd never started in the first place...
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Thankfully I never became fully addicted, but my lungs sure took a beating for a few years
Toast message