1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Eh. In any case, I'm against these kinds of groups. We can all agree on a shared vision without being card-carrying members of anything. Our individual efficacy will be determined by so many factors. We all walk different paths, we all have different talents, face different challenges, and we all have a different reach of influence. I think being part of these organized groups exposes us to blanket accusations (and investigations), which only benefits America's enemies.
The business owner who only hires real Americans, the lawyer who refuses to represent shitskin criminals, the grocery clerk who does keep an eye on those hoodie hoodlums, the subway rider who sits next to (not apart) from other White riders so they don't get attacked ... it's these small daily acts that will get us back on track. Yes, it's good to have public advocacy groups, but "joining up" isn't for everyone.
We need groups, but those groups need to be directly based on the local area and exclusive to people who are already known and trusted by members, and preferably not publicly known. An organization you can just ask to join, even if they have an efficient vetting process, is much easier to infiltrate, especially if they are public facing. Im not saying that such groups dont have their place, but what they can be expected to do is much more limited than a completely clandestine organization.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lTx0UD8p01o&pp=ygUfcGF0cmljayBiZXQgZGF2aWQgcGF0cmlvdCBmZW9udA%3D%3D
The business owner who only hires real Americans, the lawyer who refuses to represent shitskin criminals, the grocery clerk who does keep an eye on those hoodie hoodlums, the subway rider who sits next to (not apart) from other White riders so they don't get attacked ... it's these small daily acts that will get us back on track. Yes, it's good to have public advocacy groups, but "joining up" isn't for everyone.
That's kinda the point of a forum, dude.