New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
38
posted 1 year ago by Uncle_Adolf on scored.co (+1 / -0 / +37Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
24
NiggerWithAForklift on scored.co
1 year ago 24 points (+1 / -0 / +23Score on mirror ) 3 children
Remote work is a good thing.
15
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago 15 points (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror ) 3 children
Yes, but most government leeches arent actually working, so at least they should be forced to not work in an office because they deserve to suffer.
10
Butttoucha9k on scored.co
1 year ago 10 points (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
Thats a stupid take. Those offices cost money. At least save the money for the office.

What SHOULD happen is DOGE should design parameters for each type of job, gauge the workers be their productivity, and see who is productive and who isn't.

"You're productive remote? You get remote work. Youre productive but only in an office? No remote work for you. You aren't productive? You're fired."
Brannvesen on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 1 child
I blame middle management and all of that (((complexity))), if those clowns did their work, or were competent enough to do the job they're supposed to do, or if the company had a proper method to track how much efficient work each employee put in there would be no issues to pay by work rather than paying by time.

For instance, create tasks then the staff assign those tasks, complete them and get paid after someone, not a incompetent mid level boss, but a senior worker has reviewed the work and marked it as completed.

Government jobs are often insanely inefficient due to stupid regulations. These need to be removed altogether, switch to private contractors instead while the companies are tax funded and operate as efficient as any private company. Then the government only need to send out their goons to check so that all these government owned companies is doing their job properly. If they don't, cut funding and hire another company.
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror ) 1 child
> or if the company had a proper method to track how much efficient work each employee put in there

It requires a skilled human to assess that. As a programmer, if I were overseeing others, I could very well evaluate how much others do and how difficult it is. An unskilled (random diploma in some nonsense bullshit) manager can't. Idiots would count things like characters typed per hour, amount of uploads (commits) and other things.

This incentivizes people to play a game in order to win. As a programmer, you can do this: You have a function which you split up, and you copy-paste it into 5 versions, each with tiny alterations. You can extract interfaces out of classes needlessly, which adds a lot of lines of code. You can also just produce sloppy code or LLM generated code.

You can become a champion in the company and spend most of your time in playing the game instead of doing quality work.

And you are right, it's a management/leadership problem. It's rotten to the core, and most of it is all about maintaining things and doing essentially nothing. That's why they want to hire pajeet slaves, because they add +1 virtue point and are good at doing nothing.

> Government jobs are often insanely inefficient due to stupid regulations.

You cannot imagine how bad things can get anywhere, if leadership is bad. Those who get rewarded the most are obedient lackeys, and it goes down from the top, affecting the entire company's processes. Government is just naturally the worst, but companies can get close to it and still survive undeservedly. It's actually not *just* about regulations. We are talking about "intellectuals" who are arrogant idiots - the type of people I despise the most.
NiggerWithAForklift on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
The ego of non technical people trying to manage a team of engineers always frustrated me
MinisterConsumer on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Considering government workers are about the only ones who still get a pension ( after 20 years sometimes ) yes make them go back. It’s their “service” after all.
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Which is why feds don't deserve it.
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Eh. Yes and no. I think hybrid is the best or option. I have too many remote workers who definitely fail because they are remote
Toast message