New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
68
Never chase rice (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by dudebro on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +68Score on mirror )
95 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
22
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 22 points (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror ) 2 children
1970s wasn't about women getting their own money... it was when no-fault divorce became universal. she could now divorce him, take half his shit, keep him in servitude until he died, and yet she could completely walk away from her familial obligations as a woman.

why would you sign a contract with someone where if they break it, you have to pay them a shitload of money and keep paying them?

no-fault divorce is cancer. and guess (((who))) lobbied for it?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
Kopkot on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
These are similar and connected factors. Women got authority over the money
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Mirrored from scored.co
1
they-see-me-trollin on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
i get you in practice, but legally, no-fault divorce was passed universally by the 70s. no-fault divorce allows someone to break a marriage without proving fault of the other. and when women get paid practically always in divorce, suddenly no-fault divorce is a huge handout for her, incentivizing her to file for divorce.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message