You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)3 children
Oh, didn't know the bar for genius is so low.
Also this is what I said multiple times (not that any of you disagreed). That "top talent" from some random shitskin nigger-cesspool is mediocre. If you want to have actual geniuses look around you, there are some Whites who operate on that level. And stop having jews controlling all the levers and suppress productivity and innovation for the sake of ideology or greed.
Regarding IQ, it's obvious. You have 2 bell-curves, one on the left, one of the right. Whites have 100, India has 82. That's a BIG difference btw, that's 2/3 into nigger territory.
So if a White man has an IQ of 118, he deviates 18 from his ethnic average. That's IQ 100 for an Indian who deviates the same from his ethnic average. When we talk about a deviation of 30, we have 130 - a genius according to the post - vs 112 - a little above average.
If you take a 130 IQ Indian, he is truly an exception, as he deviates 48 from his ethnicity's average. For a White man it would be 148 however. That's possibly a genius level among geniuses. The only "advantage" they have is that there are a LOT of Indians, so the chances are higher. But the disadvantage is that they have a subpar education system, which doesn't develop them well. And their opposition to intellectual dissidents is higher than ours, their culture is extremely bad. And bell-curves rapidly fall off towards its extremes, so even though there are much more people, it doesn't compensate.
A true Indian genius would resent his race, and oppose having to do with them wherever possible. He'd either not want to talk about it due to shame, or be open and cynical about it.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> Oh, didn't know the bar for genius is so low.
It isn't. Historically, geniuses are generational, and not generally recognized until he is a young adult. The root of the word, 'gen' means to create, as geniuses are recognized after ideating, creating, and commercializing multiple ideas or products that push society forward. I don't know if you know this, but most of everything that has ever been invented or discovered since we were cavemen can be traced to about 3 dozen men and 1 woman (Madam Curie).
Old society actually wanted to be able to predict the next geniuses and invest resources into them early, hence so much effort on trying to identify traits of geniuses and codify measurements for them. For example, both Duke and John Hopkins had programs (Duke's was called Talent Identification Program, but who even knows what it is now).
'Genius IQ' doesn't mean that someone with that IQ is a genius, it means tested geniuses had that IQ. We don't have millions of geniuses, or we would have been in the stars despite all of our problems. We have so few geniuses that an assassination here or there is all it takes to keep us in the 'dark ages with electricity'.
I swear to God I didn’t read your comment before replying to purest’s comment. Same idea as what you commented. But yeah, it’s obvious Whites aren’t like anyone else, I’ve pointed out the fact that everything about the modern world came from the minds of White men numerous times, especially White men in the environment they had in America while it was still 90+% White. No other race has the ability to do what our people have done, so I really don’t care what average IQ scores say about jews or East Asians or whoever else, none of them are on the level White people are. What we should be focusing on is getting rid of the outside races, and doing whatever we can to cultivate creativity even further in White America through our school system, that would be the rational way to move forward if we really wanted to MAGA.
Honestly though, I’m not sure how much IQ matters so long as the baseline IQ of your country is reasonably high, like Whites bring to the table wherever they are. The true mark of genius in my opinion is how creative a people are, and Whites have that in spades. It doesn’t matter if there are some East Asians who will kick our asses in math, what has that done for them? Did they invent EVERYTHING of note over the last 5 or 600 years? No……Whites did that. Creativity is one of the most important factors in how successful a nation is, homogeneity also, but as far as what the IQ test looks at, I’m not certain it really shows how creative the test taker is, more so it shows the test takers ability to see patterns, which is important too, but not as important as creativity.
Also this is what I said multiple times (not that any of you disagreed). That "top talent" from some random shitskin nigger-cesspool is mediocre. If you want to have actual geniuses look around you, there are some Whites who operate on that level. And stop having jews controlling all the levers and suppress productivity and innovation for the sake of ideology or greed.
Regarding IQ, it's obvious. You have 2 bell-curves, one on the left, one of the right. Whites have 100, India has 82. That's a BIG difference btw, that's 2/3 into nigger territory.
So if a White man has an IQ of 118, he deviates 18 from his ethnic average. That's IQ 100 for an Indian who deviates the same from his ethnic average. When we talk about a deviation of 30, we have 130 - a genius according to the post - vs 112 - a little above average.
If you take a 130 IQ Indian, he is truly an exception, as he deviates 48 from his ethnicity's average. For a White man it would be 148 however. That's possibly a genius level among geniuses. The only "advantage" they have is that there are a LOT of Indians, so the chances are higher. But the disadvantage is that they have a subpar education system, which doesn't develop them well. And their opposition to intellectual dissidents is higher than ours, their culture is extremely bad. And bell-curves rapidly fall off towards its extremes, so even though there are much more people, it doesn't compensate.
A true Indian genius would resent his race, and oppose having to do with them wherever possible. He'd either not want to talk about it due to shame, or be open and cynical about it.
It isn't. Historically, geniuses are generational, and not generally recognized until he is a young adult. The root of the word, 'gen' means to create, as geniuses are recognized after ideating, creating, and commercializing multiple ideas or products that push society forward. I don't know if you know this, but most of everything that has ever been invented or discovered since we were cavemen can be traced to about 3 dozen men and 1 woman (Madam Curie).
Old society actually wanted to be able to predict the next geniuses and invest resources into them early, hence so much effort on trying to identify traits of geniuses and codify measurements for them. For example, both Duke and John Hopkins had programs (Duke's was called Talent Identification Program, but who even knows what it is now).
'Genius IQ' doesn't mean that someone with that IQ is a genius, it means tested geniuses had that IQ. We don't have millions of geniuses, or we would have been in the stars despite all of our problems. We have so few geniuses that an assassination here or there is all it takes to keep us in the 'dark ages with electricity'.