Consume Product - Arete Network

This is the competitive offer Gen-Z wants

posted 1 year ago by MI7BZ3EW on scored.co (+0 / -0 / )

Permalink

Give Gen-Z what our grandparents had, and they'll jump at the chance.

This is what it should look like:

* A lifetime job with inflation adjusted income. Work around the tax code by providing a company vehicle or whatever. Wages don't need to be that high, just decent. Gen-Z isn't trying to accumulate stacks of cash.
* No college or trade schools. Just train them in the job. Keep retraining them as the industry changes and technology advances.
* Stay-at-home moms! If both parents have to work, it's not worth it.
* Decent working hours. 40 hours a week max. If work is slow, cut hours back (but not salary of course.) Let them work 4 10s or whatever so they can spend time with their kids. Or let them spend time working on side-projects for the company. Maybe work overtime from time to time, but it better be compensated and rare. Maybe 2 weeks overtime in a year.
* Live near the job with minimal commute. Or better yet, telecommute. They know that driving into downtown city USA is pointless. There's no reason to have your company located there.
* Get a house on less than one year's wages. No mortgage. They don't need a million square feet. A 3 bedroom house with decent sized bedrooms so you can put in bunk beds is sufficient. A nice living room with a kitchen so the family spends their time together. Ultimately, most of the free time Gen-Z will spend is going to be on the computer anyway.
* Some way to accumulate real wealth over time. By the time the Gen-Z employee retires, he wants something he can pass to his kids. He doesn't mind living with a little less than his parents and grandparents in retirement, but he doesn't want to jeopardize his kid's future either.

It really isn't too much to ask. Gen-Z isn't interested in money and pointless expressions of wealth, again. They are looking for quality of life and immaterial things that money can't buy. They want to build family and community. They don't want to sacrifice everything for a company only to be kicked to the curb.

If they could trust the company to be loyal to them, they just might be loyal to the company.

Delon on scored.co

1 year ago 21 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

best i can do is having you compete with the third world for the opportunity to work 3 jobs so you can barely afford rent (you need 5, 7, and 10 years of experience respectively + a degree for all of them), replacing you in your own nation while you marry a former prostitute, your daughter is stabbed to death in school and your son becomes a tranny.

Aren't you glad you saved us from the ovens?

Permalink Reply

MI7BZ3EW on scored.co

1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Jews will be surprised to find out who John Galt is.

TallestSkil on scored.co

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / )

The character from the jewish fantasy novel?

GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co

1 year ago 15 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

you just described america in its 50's

and as long kikes rule america, they'll keep replacing zoomers with jeets and other brown slave-labor

ShinraKoketsu on scored.co

1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

Yeah, that’s the thing. Even 50’s america had…you know. The hooked-nose issue. Even then degeneracy was seeping into the mainstream. Everybody who lived through that time that has even a tenth of a brain can tell you that much….

We keep memory of the past and our ancestor’s deeds—whether they be noble and virtuous or reprehensible—but we do not and should not repeat the same mistakes they did.

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / ) 2 children

i mean back then the jews fully controlled finance but they still had to play it sneaky because the average american didn't like jews and saw them as parasites and communists

the police & military were entirely on the side of White americans but slowly throughout the years the jews managed to oust these White Patriots and replace them with snakey snakey kikes and their shabbos golems

systemthrowaway on scored.co

1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

>the police & military were entirely on the side of White americans

[You mean this one in 1954?](https://files.catbox.moe/ryijz4.jpg)

yeah you know what, fuck america it was always zogged to hell and back.

1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / )

America died in the 1800s, it didn't even last 100 years.

-1

1 year ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / )

Pretty much

1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / )

I forgot to mention: Gen-Z does not want to live in an integrated neighborhood.

removed 1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

deleted 1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

removed 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

Kopkot on scored.co

I think 90% of this is irrelevant.

Gen z men want: a home country for their people, a route to success in their home society, and government that doesn't steal all their money through taxes.

We don't need a bunch of random economic gibs. Young people aren't motivated to work for more shekels, we want our own society to prosper in, and to stop being put down and stolen from.

Jarilo on scored.co

1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

If you mention standard European social benefits like 5 weeks of paid vacation per year or the long maternity leave, then American boomers immediately scream "communism".

Ironically, commies were very good at providing housing to everybody. Just look at the home ownership rate in ex-commie countries - that is the result of government policies during the reign of Communist parties. Of course, this is how you get the depressing commie block jungles...

That being said, 20th century commie engineers have figured out things that seem to be too difficult in some western countries, like double-pane windows (for some reason, Canada and the US still have a lot of buildings with crappy single pane windows), or how to mix hot and cold water so that it results in a pleasant temperature (the UK still hasn't fully figured this out), or how to heat the homes so that you don't have to wear a coat indoors (a big problem in parts of Germany, Canada and the US, for some reason)

>Of course, this is how you get the depressing commie block jungles...

Unfortunately here in America modern housing developments look even worse and even the workmanship is probably inferior.

hkdlxohk on scored.co

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

And then there's Toronto and Vancouver, where you can get in a condo worse than a commie block apartment, but pay $2 million for it.

1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / )

At least shitty condos are compact. I loath housing developments because they spread out over valuable land.

1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / ) 1 child

>A lifetime job with inflation adjusted income.

Mathematically impossible.

>No college or trade schools. Just train them in the job.

Extra costs.

>Stay-at-home moms! If both parents have to work, it's not worth it.

That’s the point, though.

>If work is slow, cut hours back (but not salary of course.)

Prices increase.

>Live near the job with minimal commute.

Nonwhites exist near the job. Hence suburbs.

>Get a house on less than one year's wages. No mortgage.

How, by magic?

>Some way to accumulate real wealth over time.

Physically impossible.

>By the time the Gen-Z employee retires

Gen Z isn’t going to retire. There will be no retirement services by the time they’re that old, and they’re likely not going to live that long anyway.

>It really isn't too much to ask.

“How about we don’t kill you *immediately*, goy? That’s all the reward you deserve.” ~ your owners

>If they could trust the company to be loyal to them, they just might be loyal to the company.

The company doesn’t need them. It has infinity subhuman animals to import to replace you.

It's just a fantasy-post, man

WeedleTLiar on scored.co

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child

>A lifetime job with inflation adjusted income.

Raises should be based on performance, base rate should go up/down with inflation.

>Just train them in the job.

OMG, yes. Fucking Elon talking about "no skilled workers"; then fucking train some! Schools/individuals have no idea what your specific company wants, so tell them.

>40 hours a week max.

This really only works in White Collar work, anything trades needs to work to the job. That said, overtime needs to be enforced.

>This is a side effect of lifetime employment; if I expect to work at the same company for the next ten years, it's worth it to me to buy a house close to work. If I'm going to be job hopping, I'll necessarily have to commute (or live in a van).

>A 3 bedroom house with decent sized bedrooms so you can put in bunk beds is sufficient.

Houses are all at least this big and, frankly, it doesn't make sense for them to be small; if you have land you may as well use it. What we actually need (and no one wants to hear it) are apartments that are big enough to raise families in.

>Some way to accumulate real wealth over time.

Not even accumulate, but if families could collaborate on a single piece of owned property big enough for a dozen people, and use it for their retirement, it would be enough to just maintain it.

1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )

Apartments transfer the responsibility of managing the land to the owner. The renters abuse the house and the property while they live there because it's not their concern. I am opposed to anyone renting.

Families should live on land owned by their ancestors with the expectation that their kids will inherit it. That way, they will make long-term investments in the land with their labor and resources.