New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
https://christogenea.org/podcasts/bible-discussion/basic-defense-christian-identity-part-1-perspectives-development-christianity
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
White

If you translate the word, that's what it means. You're assuming it has modern jew connotations, which it doesn't as they're not the people of the Bible.

Judeans, sure. Same with the wider Israelites, who are all White. Not modern day Edomites.

No, we have proof: 100 Proofs the Israelites were White

That's the point I made above with historic proof - Judea became multi-racial. Some were Edomites, who we call jews today - Esau's children, and since he was a race mixer, Jacob got the inheritance. There were absolutely true Judeans, who are fully Israelites and not part Edomites.

All the things you think make Scripture jewish can be addressed if you listen to stuff on that site, and you can look these things up for yourself to verify.
HoodBillyBob on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I've already verified and it's a massive cope. We could get somewhere if you answered my questions. Specifically the one about the pharisees
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
I did answer.

You haven't verified anything lmao, go listen to some podcasts on that site.
HoodBillyBob on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You didn't. You deflected. Schizophrenic you can't even say if the Pharisees were jews or not. You didn't even mention the word LOL. Yes or no.
Can-Maga on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Some were true Judeans, Israelis, and some were Edomites, which we call jews today. That's how there were those who say they are Judeans and are not, but are the synagogue(assembly) of Satan(the adversary).

So yes and no.
SSAnon1488 on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Lol, when he talks about the Pharisees he is looking for cope validation about a discussion he was having with me.

He is saying Jesus was a Edomite Sephardic Pharisee (and as such can’t be trusted as he is Jewish), I say he isn’t because Jesus is proven to be from the line of David.

He likes to use the verse: “he came into his own, and his own received him not.” And says because the Pharisees didn’t receive him the Sephardic Pharisees we’re his own. It’s not hard to see why this is brain dead. If he tries to say something like this just tell him to remember the Ethiopian ;)
Toast message