You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
1
ScallionPancake on scored.co
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
I've heard that argument many times. But it isn't a sustainable model, we can't let flawed business practices thrive long term because it may affect jobs on the short term.
We need a large corporation to go bust so that the rest of them get a reality check. They need to understand that they can't just continuously make irrational decisions and stay in business because of the concept of "too big to fail". No more government bailouts waiting to save their asses.
Let these woman run, pajeet hiring, diversity pushing, feminism promoting companies fail. Receive no bailout, and go fully under. The affected jobs would be unfortunate in the short term, but in the long run this will be a good thing.
I mean look at Boeing, they've pushed DEI and made so many retarded decisions that their planes are starting to fall apart mid air. Another Boeing plane just crashed in S. Korea earlier today. This country is barely competitive when it comes to manufacturing, we can't make cars, planes, trains, or anything better than the Japanese or Europeans.
> We need a large corporation to go bust so that the rest of them get a reality check.
No, investors need to force conservatorship, fire the executives and install leadership focused on preserving market share and cutting down on wasteful projects. We don't need to implode the whole industry, GM just needs new leadership. I don't think you appreciate how hard it is to build up to what we have now. We just need responsible leadership focused on market demand and NOT ideology.
We need a large corporation to go bust so that the rest of them get a reality check. They need to understand that they can't just continuously make irrational decisions and stay in business because of the concept of "too big to fail". No more government bailouts waiting to save their asses.
Let these woman run, pajeet hiring, diversity pushing, feminism promoting companies fail. Receive no bailout, and go fully under. The affected jobs would be unfortunate in the short term, but in the long run this will be a good thing.
I mean look at Boeing, they've pushed DEI and made so many retarded decisions that their planes are starting to fall apart mid air. Another Boeing plane just crashed in S. Korea earlier today. This country is barely competitive when it comes to manufacturing, we can't make cars, planes, trains, or anything better than the Japanese or Europeans.
No, investors need to force conservatorship, fire the executives and install leadership focused on preserving market share and cutting down on wasteful projects. We don't need to implode the whole industry, GM just needs new leadership. I don't think you appreciate how hard it is to build up to what we have now. We just need responsible leadership focused on market demand and NOT ideology.
Won't happen unless there are consequences.
> fire the executives and install leadership focused on preserving market share and cutting down on wasteful projects
Won't happen unless there are consequences.
> We just need responsible leadership focused on market demand and NOT ideology
Won't happen unless there are consequences.
Then again, they've been committed to this path for a decade now with nothing to show for it.