Many things have been stated about this insidious movement. Do they groom young kids who have no idea what theyre even talking about into thinking theyre women so they can make them into case studies? Yes. Is it pushed on by the rootless international cabal of a hooked-nose nature? Yes. Many things have been stated about it are true…yet they are symptoms of an underlying disease. Something far more hidden, occult, and dangerous. Something that can only really be understood if you knew the phenotypes and pathology of the people who are orchestrating these events—especially those who write the psychological literature and organize the case studies—because these entities aren’t people. They are foreign and alien. They poke, prod, and experiment upon unsuspecting young men; generally young white men of a Nordic appearance.
Now, what do I mean when I call it a “eunuch-making ritual”? It’s very simple…this is what the movement seeks to create. And not just any eunuch—since there were eunuchs who were made into them in adulthood during Classical Antiquity—specifically, a type of eunuch that was seen as an “eternal boy”. Those who were made eunuchs before they had fully finished puberty. These were generally seen as eternally boys. They exhibit very youthful, almost androgynous appearances; something that makes them sometimes—only really to those who are more docile and accepting of the moral decay of our time—seem like women. They are the new castrati. They are not women in any meaningful sense of the term, and to call them “women” is an insult; not only to women, but especially to young girls.
Of course, this is a very Jewish sensibility. Jews recognize roughly—and I preface this by saying I am not an expert on the opinions of rabbis and Jewish theologians in general and they could say there are even more of them—eight genders. Yes, eight. The only thing I am roughly willing to accept is that you COULD hypothetically recognize people with genetical anomalies, such as different types of hermaphroditic conditions, as being of another sex…but even then, the exception typically PROVES the rule, and doesn’t DISPROVE it. Even intersex folk tend to be more male or more female…and very rarely they have no pull to either sex, but that is not to say it is a “norm”. It is just a PHYSICAL observation.
So, they at first twisted the fact that there are people with genetic anomalies which cause them to have a mixture of traits from the two sexes—or those with no particular affiliation with both male and female traits—into being truly “unique”. The first “gender affirming surgeries” were done on these people, and it was almost always without their consent, mind you; and then they moved on to groom young boys—and sometimes young women, but this is more rare—into teaching them into being the opposite sex from what God intended them to be. They represent different “genders” according to Rabbinic thought than those who have genuine hermaphroditic medical conditions, and I believe they have specific terminologies…I’m not too aware of it.
John Money’s experiments into it are the most insidious. There are others like it, but none strikes as particularly revolting as his. He forced two brothers—or maybe one, im not too sure—into being groomed to acting like women. He not only groomed them psychologically, but also sexually; since if I remember right, he forced them to play naked with each other while he photographed and seemed to have pedophilic sexual inclinations…funny, since psychological indications seem to state that those with such inclinations tend to be more animalistic and slaves to their baser desires. How funny. Genuinely, look up any medical research into what causes it; you’ll be in for a good laugh.
These are just my assorted thoughts on the subject. I’m very plain and manner-of-factly about these topics. That is all.
Now, what do I mean when I call it a “eunuch-making ritual”? It’s very simple…this is what the movement seeks to create. And not just any eunuch—since there were eunuchs who were made into them in adulthood during Classical Antiquity—specifically, a type of eunuch that was seen as an “eternal boy”. Those who were made eunuchs before they had fully finished puberty. These were generally seen as eternally boys. They exhibit very youthful, almost androgynous appearances; something that makes them sometimes—only really to those who are more docile and accepting of the moral decay of our time—seem like women. They are the new castrati. They are not women in any meaningful sense of the term, and to call them “women” is an insult; not only to women, but especially to young girls.
Of course, this is a very Jewish sensibility. Jews recognize roughly—and I preface this by saying I am not an expert on the opinions of rabbis and Jewish theologians in general and they could say there are even more of them—eight genders. Yes, eight. The only thing I am roughly willing to accept is that you COULD hypothetically recognize people with genetical anomalies, such as different types of hermaphroditic conditions, as being of another sex…but even then, the exception typically PROVES the rule, and doesn’t DISPROVE it. Even intersex folk tend to be more male or more female…and very rarely they have no pull to either sex, but that is not to say it is a “norm”. It is just a PHYSICAL observation.
So, they at first twisted the fact that there are people with genetic anomalies which cause them to have a mixture of traits from the two sexes—or those with no particular affiliation with both male and female traits—into being truly “unique”. The first “gender affirming surgeries” were done on these people, and it was almost always without their consent, mind you; and then they moved on to groom young boys—and sometimes young women, but this is more rare—into teaching them into being the opposite sex from what God intended them to be. They represent different “genders” according to Rabbinic thought than those who have genuine hermaphroditic medical conditions, and I believe they have specific terminologies…I’m not too aware of it.
John Money’s experiments into it are the most insidious. There are others like it, but none strikes as particularly revolting as his. He forced two brothers—or maybe one, im not too sure—into being groomed to acting like women. He not only groomed them psychologically, but also sexually; since if I remember right, he forced them to play naked with each other while he photographed and seemed to have pedophilic sexual inclinations…funny, since psychological indications seem to state that those with such inclinations tend to be more animalistic and slaves to their baser desires. How funny. Genuinely, look up any medical research into what causes it; you’ll be in for a good laugh.
These are just my assorted thoughts on the subject. I’m very plain and manner-of-factly about these topics. That is all.