New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
31
posted 1 year ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
This 'terrorist' attack defies all the usual expectations. It wasn't a non-white with animosity towards Whites, like that 'British' Rwandan who stabbed those three little girls. It wasn't a White attacking non-whites, either, like Tarrant in Christchurch. It was a non-religious non-white with animosity towards Muslim non-whites but who then proceeded to attack a range of people.

In more detail, the perpetrator was a Saudi Arab, but he was basically an 'Islamophobe' who first went to the Left and who more recently seemed to have become a full-blown Zionist with AfD sympathies. He claimed that this is because the AfD and Zionists more broadly share the same enemies, *viz.* Muslims. In the vein of AfD supporters, he self-identified as a liberal and labelled the German state 'socialists' and Muslim sympathizers. He also seemed to be involved with refugees, supporting non-Muslim Saudi Arabs who wanted to emigrate from their country to get to Germany.

This is about non-whites importing their problems, in this case, the semitic squabbles, into Europe, and being radicalized into Zionism and other nonsense once inside Europe.

In short, if there were no Arabs, no yids, and no Muslims, this wouldn't have happened: the perpetrator's whole story revolves around the nexus between these three things. His stances, ultimately, were that Arabs were good, liberals were good, yids were good, Muslims were bad, and as 'socialists' aren't sufficiently anti-Muslim, they're also bad.
Toast message