New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
EVERY movement is corrupted. EVERY single one. And even those that grasp an approximation or facsimile of the Truth seem to be merely edgy kids who post pepe the frog memes and still talk about Kekistan nowadays (why did they even allow themselves to worship a pagan Egyptian idol so easily? quite funny. it’s equal to medjed and the connection to amogus…I prefer those).


If a genuine movement for the advancement of spiritual and racial consciousness seeks to do anything of note, beyond just vague memes and occasionally rehearsing some wikipedia article on the Lavon affair (we know your kind. I see you. You dont really do much) you basically have to give your entire life to the thought. It has to seep deep into your subconscious. It cannot and must not be a mere “mask” to act edgy or superior to others…your superiority must be proven by action, not words, and your strength shown by gesture, not saying “based” things ad nauseum…I’m tired of yesmen.


From now on unless you give up your life to the advancement of the Movement I consider you anathema. We have to be aristocratic, elitist, prohibitive. If subversives emerge they will be dealt with swiftly, without impunity, and harshly. No more part-time believers. No more pepe-the-frog genuflectors of talking heads on the internet. This is a movement. Not a group of followers. A group of leaders. A group of people who see the patterns of things going on in the world, know who’s behind them, but do not act out of envy. They act out of genuine beguilement to the ideology of those in power and wish to unbind the shackles that mind them to this current system.


Trash me if you wish…We need to be a radical, avant-garde movement. We cannot concede. We don’t need the approval of the whole wide world when we can find a few, maybe three or four or even two people who are genuinely reliable and devoted to the cause.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
There's a reason why Adolf didn't tailor his message solely to the aristocratic upper class. There's a reason why he tailored and delivered his message to be understood by a factory worker, an engineer, a statesman, and an aristocrat all at the same time. Being an elitist yourself, I'm sure you've read all about it in Mein Kampf already...
-1
ShinraKoketsu on scored.co
1 year ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Oh yes I understand where you’re coming from. What I mean is in the sense that to the outside world it seems prohibitive. Almost to the point we kind of seem like a cult. I just don’t want types who are too mainstream in the movement. Sure, it’d be great to have that acceptance in the future…But I don’t want the message to be too diluted. Sure, it’d be worded more broadly. But that’s about it.

I mean aristocratic in a Platonic sense.
SFAM1A on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Almost to the point we kind of seem like a cult.

Except that's the last thing we need to be. Adolf met everybody where they were, even the bolsheviks and reds. You speak in a very idealistic sense without a single thought of how things are actually gonna go down in the real world, is all I'm saying. Yeah I'd like to live in an ideal world too, but we don't. What you describe would be great for a handful of "aristocratic elites" within the "inner circle" so to speak, and absolutely disastrous to form the *entire movement* around.
-1
ShinraKoketsu on scored.co
1 year ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror )
And he was also a pragmatist. It worked for early 20th century Germany. You say it doesn’t work but you are literally giving me examples of a man who lived almost a century ago. No disrespect to the man, but I also think very pragmatically. I essentially do this as a vetting mechanism. Sure, there can be a broader cultural movement that we COULD hypothetically align with, which some populist rhetoric, but the issue is:


 1. there’s significantly more non-whites, both in general but in the West in particular.


2. The West in a spiritual sense, the Occident, is not confined to mere geographical boundaries. It is a neurological, spiritual ethos. It began with the Greeks, was refined by the Romans and defined in full by the Germanics, Nordics, and other related peoples such as the Dutch, Anglos, etc.


3. Our movement has to be aligned with those who share our neurological, cultural, and spiritual values. The Occident is not just vague “isms”…


I get where you’re coming from, but I am so fed up with the current situation of all other political movements…might do something on my own accord.
Toast message