Syria got flooded by a bunch CIA and Mossad funded mercenaries. The “rebels” weren’t even real rebels.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
11 comments:
6
1 year ago
6 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+6Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
1 year ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
1 child
Meh. All rebels are mercenaries. In my experience, insurgent forces do not fight for free.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
4
1 year ago
4 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+4Score on mirror
)
These people don’t even live in Syria that’s the point. They’re not rebelling against anything, they don’t live there, they’re foreign mercenaries.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1. Russia is not the most powerful army in the world. That is still the US military.
2. Russia is 100% occupied fighting a war (not "special military action") in Ukraine.
3. Projecting force is very difficult, as the Americans have discovered, getting wrecked by Houthis in Yemen. On paper, they shouldn't even be an opponent. Yet they more or less completely defied the will of the US using military force.
2. Russia is 100% occupied fighting a war (not "special military action") in Ukraine.
3. Projecting force is very difficult, as the Americans have discovered, getting wrecked by Houthis in Yemen. On paper, they shouldn't even be an opponent. Yet they more or less completely defied the will of the US using military force.
Russia isn't the one to be questioning here. To be fair the army is stretched thin by the gayop in the Ukraine, and guerilla wars require a level of attention that isn't available to them.
Who is in question though? Iran. Why did they do absolutely fuck all nothing to help syria? Their closest ally? They withdrew from the country entirely. They did absolutely *nothing* when their army is A: more than powerful enough, and B: their army is currently not engaged in any conflict whatsoever
I almost guarantee that Iran is an Israeli gayop to this day. The first thing Khomeini did after taking power was he tried to incite shiites in Iraq into a rebellion. Why would he even do this? Shiites in Iraq had full rights and also military positions. Iraq was not confrontational, they extended an olive branch to iran after the 1979 revolution. There was very little sectarianism in Iraq until Iran created it out of thin fucking air. Iraq was Israel's main enemy and the only country that actually could have, and was gearing up to, game end them. Iran invented problems for it that still exist even after 2003.
Syria is another baathist country with minimal (but more present than iraq) sectarianism. Hafez al assad was an alawite so he aligned syria with Iran as opposed to Iraq. He made an incredibly fucking stupid decision. Iran has only caused trouble towards the fight against Israel and their private feelings about another baathist country were probably far more negative than their public ones.
I don't view syrias pivot towards Iran as malicious, but more biased and incredibly short sighted. It was purely for religious purposes, as the Assads are Shia. Saddam was Sunni. The founder of baathism was a Christian syrian. He was exiled from syria to appease Iran and became friends with saddam.
Who is in question though? Iran. Why did they do absolutely fuck all nothing to help syria? Their closest ally? They withdrew from the country entirely. They did absolutely *nothing* when their army is A: more than powerful enough, and B: their army is currently not engaged in any conflict whatsoever
I almost guarantee that Iran is an Israeli gayop to this day. The first thing Khomeini did after taking power was he tried to incite shiites in Iraq into a rebellion. Why would he even do this? Shiites in Iraq had full rights and also military positions. Iraq was not confrontational, they extended an olive branch to iran after the 1979 revolution. There was very little sectarianism in Iraq until Iran created it out of thin fucking air. Iraq was Israel's main enemy and the only country that actually could have, and was gearing up to, game end them. Iran invented problems for it that still exist even after 2003.
Syria is another baathist country with minimal (but more present than iraq) sectarianism. Hafez al assad was an alawite so he aligned syria with Iran as opposed to Iraq. He made an incredibly fucking stupid decision. Iran has only caused trouble towards the fight against Israel and their private feelings about another baathist country were probably far more negative than their public ones.
I don't view syrias pivot towards Iran as malicious, but more biased and incredibly short sighted. It was purely for religious purposes, as the Assads are Shia. Saddam was Sunni. The founder of baathism was a Christian syrian. He was exiled from syria to appease Iran and became friends with saddam.
Thanks. Good point. Do you also happen to know why Saddam invaded Kuwait? This makes me believe that he was also controlled by Jews.
Saddam invaded Kuwait because Kuwait was slant drilling into Iraqi oil fields (stealing Iraqi oil). A perfectly valid reason to do so.
There's a bigger picture here though. Kuwait was also (probably) an attempt to bait israel into a war which would have involved several other Arab countries and which probably would have brought about the end of Israel as a state. Why? Because Iraq launched scud missiles at israel during the gulf war. Israel was ready to retaliate, but thank God for the US government stepping in and saving them. The participation of israel in a war with Iraq would have meant that arabic coalition countries would have immediately dropped the gulf War, and would have went to war with israel, and Iraq would have likely dropped Kuwait as well.
Why did they invade Kuwait in the first place though? Because Kuwait was doing incredibly shady shit. Iraq had an opportunity to destroy Israel because of Kuwait.
Here's why this all actually makes sense: Saddam was a pragmatist. He was incredibly smart with everything he did. He wanted israel gone. He gave america the excuse to go to war with him, furthermore, he gave israel the excuse to go to war with him too. Such a war would have ended israel as a nation. And Iraq only loses Kuwait, that they occupied to create a war. However, US advisors stepped in and told israel not to retaliate, so nothing happened (nothing ever happens). Why couldn't he have just launched missiles at israel anyways? 0 casus belli and the fact that it would make the US invade Iraq a decade prior.
Nobody on earth outside of israel and America ever expected 9/11 and the subsequent US re-invasion of Iraq. So 2003 is out of this discussion entirely.
There's a bigger picture here though. Kuwait was also (probably) an attempt to bait israel into a war which would have involved several other Arab countries and which probably would have brought about the end of Israel as a state. Why? Because Iraq launched scud missiles at israel during the gulf war. Israel was ready to retaliate, but thank God for the US government stepping in and saving them. The participation of israel in a war with Iraq would have meant that arabic coalition countries would have immediately dropped the gulf War, and would have went to war with israel, and Iraq would have likely dropped Kuwait as well.
Why did they invade Kuwait in the first place though? Because Kuwait was doing incredibly shady shit. Iraq had an opportunity to destroy Israel because of Kuwait.
Here's why this all actually makes sense: Saddam was a pragmatist. He was incredibly smart with everything he did. He wanted israel gone. He gave america the excuse to go to war with him, furthermore, he gave israel the excuse to go to war with him too. Such a war would have ended israel as a nation. And Iraq only loses Kuwait, that they occupied to create a war. However, US advisors stepped in and told israel not to retaliate, so nothing happened (nothing ever happens). Why couldn't he have just launched missiles at israel anyways? 0 casus belli and the fact that it would make the US invade Iraq a decade prior.
Nobody on earth outside of israel and America ever expected 9/11 and the subsequent US re-invasion of Iraq. So 2003 is out of this discussion entirely.
“Free Syria” is the biggest psyop ever. Literally nobody knew what it was just a few weeks ago and now i’ve seen memes about it in a similar vein to NAFO. It’s the most obvious controlled nation ever.
After 10 years of fighting with rebels, these veteran soldiers suddenly got scared, dropped everything and ran before the fight even started.
It doesn't make sense. Unless (((they))) used some kind of advanced voice to skull weapon system.
It's odd that no former Syrian soldier is talking about what happened. It's likely that what ever happened is being scrubbed from the internet.
It doesn't make sense. Unless (((they))) used some kind of advanced voice to skull weapon system.
It's odd that no former Syrian soldier is talking about what happened. It's likely that what ever happened is being scrubbed from the internet.
Toast message