You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
MI7BZ3EW on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Sure, there were no plates. You just have to disqualify the witnesses of something like 100 people who actually experienced the plates in various circumstances.
I think historians are all convinced that there had to be plates, and that they were metal.
The Book of Mormon doesn't testify of Joseph Smith. Listen to me closely: The fact that Joseph Smith produced the Book of Mormon is evidence that he was divinely inspired.
Really, there is only one possible reasonable conclusion from the evidence we have before us. But since you haven't seen the evidence, you wouldn't know. You just trust your pastor or whoever else is trying to deceive you rather than actually looking at the evidence.
I should be surprised that my sarcasm went right over your head, but you're a Mormon so critically analyzing statements is clearly not your strong suit.
I think historians are all convinced that there had to be plates, and that they were metal.
The Book of Mormon doesn't testify of Joseph Smith. Listen to me closely: The fact that Joseph Smith produced the Book of Mormon is evidence that he was divinely inspired.
Really, there is only one possible reasonable conclusion from the evidence we have before us. But since you haven't seen the evidence, you wouldn't know. You just trust your pastor or whoever else is trying to deceive you rather than actually looking at the evidence.
And you guys call us a cult. It's silly, really.
You certainly didn't learn it from him.
Go directly to the sources and try to figure out where they got it from.
A bad spring doesn't make sweet water.