New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
20
Did Israel just nuke Syria? (twitter.com)
posted 1 year ago by dudebro on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +20Score on mirror )
17 comments
Permalink
Mirrored from scored.co
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
9
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
>what is an exothermic chemical reaction

>how does it operate with respect to external atmospheric conditions

>MUST BE A NUKE

You wouldn’t be seeing this video if it was a nuke. The phone would have fried the moment it saw the initial light and the holder would have been simultaneously blinded, so even if he had tried to press “upload” in the seconds before the blast wave liquified his organs, it wouldn’t have uploaded.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
What tallest is trying to say it would be fried by the EMP
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
dudebro on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 5 children
Not doubting you, but then how do we have old video footage of nukes? Are they fake?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
7
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
Physical, mechanical cameras. No electronics in them.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
Those were shot on film cameras, not digital ones, hundreds of yards away. That is how big a nuclear explosion is. Few if any personnel were around if I remember. The reason that if this video featured a nuke it would've killed the uploader is that it would've been too close to the source and also simultaneously fried from the radiation and whatever freaky waves a nuke makes.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
BelievingDidymus on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Those folms of trees blowing back ect are on a model set fyi
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
They were recorded by humans when they were still "small", and recorded by unmanned devices when they grew larger. Distance is also relevant - if you stand at the right distance, a star with a radius of 2Gm will look the same as a star with a radius of 100Gm. There was also a word to describe it... it was something about the size based on view angle.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Apparent magnitude?
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
[Angular Size](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_diameter) or diameter.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
1
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
ahh i see

til
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
2
BelievingDidymus on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Nukes are fake Jewish fear porn.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
derjudenjager on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
They have always been fake but they do have them now.
Permalink Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Toast message