In short, feminist women attempt to become the husband they want. Of course their instincts want someone superior to them, so if they achieve the kind of accomplishments they want in a husband, they want an even better husband. This in spite of the fact that her sexual marketplace value has *depreciated* due to age and because men don't care about female achievements.
Why are they doing this?
At some point, our culture confused sex appeal with social status... the two concepts formed an unholy union. Because male prestige confers sexiness, most women think gaining prestige would raise their own sexual market value. They are starting to realize what men want is "thin fertile debt-free virgins with no tattoos", but progress is slow. Women's prestige is their pedigree.
Men are equally guilty. The sting of "incel" is only there when the man thinks sex appeal = status. Fucking trannies are abusing this confusion, and believe it or not, they're more likely to get laid as an ugly pre-op transvestite than as a garbage-tier male. Since when was the ability to get laid the most enviable of achievements?
We cannot continue this confusion. Sex appeal is only a small part of the worth of a man... and the worth of a man is decided by other men, not by women. Male prestige is conferred when another men honors him or is bested by him. When women join a competitive game, it makes the game meaningless. Prestige hierarchies are produced by male-only environments... and getting laid (by straight women) is one of the few remaining arenas where only men compete.
Women want everyone to be winners, that's why they invented participation awards. This is why colleges have lost their prestige since the introduction of co-eds. It no longer serves its original function of establishing an objective hierarchy of men (within the context of intellectual performance). Instead it's become openly shamed by the majority "counterculture". Blue haired liberals are known to be toxic people, as well as college socialists, etc. They're mocked for getting a mountain of debt and useless degrees - women are especially guilty of this.
However, income has maintained its prestige, and the jooze award good performance in academic brainwashing with substantial incomes and administrative positions. In those circles, they all believe in the prestige of degrees, unaware that most people won't respect them for it. This is how (((they))) maintain loyalty to institutions everyone hates.
So what's the solution? Well the current unspoken narrative is "women who get married and have kids young were the ones who couldn't hack it in college and business".
The corrective narrative is **"women who go to college are the ones who couldn't hack it as young wives and mothers"**. Women with degrees should be treated like guys with oversized trucks - "think she's compensating for something?" "We get it, we get it, you've taken a lot of dick."
Corrective action is to raise up your fellow man by honoring him for being manly, whatever that means to you, and in group settings, to degrade the value of women's sexual opinions of men, whether they're negative or positive. Redirect the conversation to your vision of the worth of a man.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.
Why are they doing this?
At some point, our culture confused sex appeal with social status... the two concepts formed an unholy union. Because male prestige confers sexiness, most women think gaining prestige would raise their own sexual market value. They are starting to realize what men want is "thin fertile debt-free virgins with no tattoos", but progress is slow. Women's prestige is their pedigree.
Men are equally guilty. The sting of "incel" is only there when the man thinks sex appeal = status. Fucking trannies are abusing this confusion, and believe it or not, they're more likely to get laid as an ugly pre-op transvestite than as a garbage-tier male. Since when was the ability to get laid the most enviable of achievements?
We cannot continue this confusion. Sex appeal is only a small part of the worth of a man... and the worth of a man is decided by other men, not by women. Male prestige is conferred when another men honors him or is bested by him. When women join a competitive game, it makes the game meaningless. Prestige hierarchies are produced by male-only environments... and getting laid (by straight women) is one of the few remaining arenas where only men compete.
Women want everyone to be winners, that's why they invented participation awards. This is why colleges have lost their prestige since the introduction of co-eds. It no longer serves its original function of establishing an objective hierarchy of men (within the context of intellectual performance). Instead it's become openly shamed by the majority "counterculture". Blue haired liberals are known to be toxic people, as well as college socialists, etc. They're mocked for getting a mountain of debt and useless degrees - women are especially guilty of this.
However, income has maintained its prestige, and the jooze award good performance in academic brainwashing with substantial incomes and administrative positions. In those circles, they all believe in the prestige of degrees, unaware that most people won't respect them for it. This is how (((they))) maintain loyalty to institutions everyone hates.
So what's the solution? Well the current unspoken narrative is "women who get married and have kids young were the ones who couldn't hack it in college and business".
The corrective narrative is **"women who go to college are the ones who couldn't hack it as young wives and mothers"**. Women with degrees should be treated like guys with oversized trucks - "think she's compensating for something?" "We get it, we get it, you've taken a lot of dick."
Corrective action is to raise up your fellow man by honoring him for being manly, whatever that means to you, and in group settings, to degrade the value of women's sexual opinions of men, whether they're negative or positive. Redirect the conversation to your vision of the worth of a man.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk.