1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
American circumcision is a product of the era of medical innovations that happened in the late 19th and early 20th century. There was so much changing about medical science so rapidly that a lot of terrible practices wound up being accepted by most doctors. Since a lot of medical innovation was happening in the US, it's reasonable to believe that this is just where circumcision happened to take hold. There's also the fact that, even after WWII, Europe was not very friendly to jews and therefore didn't really consider circumsion anything more than a weird jewish practice. The US and its healthcare industry was more friendly and welcoming to jews.
This was the era of "shock them til they're not crazy anymore" and "let's develop vaccines for everything" and "there's a new drug for that". Obviously things haven't changed much, but they have changed. Many doctors are opposed to circumcision now. When my son was born, the nurses simply asked us if we wanted it done or not and didn't try to tell us it was good or necessary, in fact it was easier for us to say no because then we didn't have to sign any forms about it. In that way, no circumcision was almost the default choice.
>There was so much changing about medical science so rapidly that a lot of terrible practices wound up being accepted by most doctors.
Sounds familiar...
This is a result of techo-progressivism; we assume all new technology will improve our lives. Turns out that's not even close to true, but the technology that does so creates so many benefits that it's easy to attribute them to technology in general.
We're seeing the exact same thing as we've seen for the past 100 years (at least) but instead of Thalidomide and asbaetos, it's mRNA and hormonal birth control.
Science needs to be extremely conservative or it will cause more harm than good in the long run.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
I wish I hadn't had my son circumcised. I didn't know anything about it at the time...I was circumcised as a baby, so I figured it was the thing to do. If you know anyone considering it, just have them watch a video of a circumcision. There's plenty to be found...it's considered "medical knowledge". That'll change their opinion real quick when you see a baby go through that.
This was the era of "shock them til they're not crazy anymore" and "let's develop vaccines for everything" and "there's a new drug for that". Obviously things haven't changed much, but they have changed. Many doctors are opposed to circumcision now. When my son was born, the nurses simply asked us if we wanted it done or not and didn't try to tell us it was good or necessary, in fact it was easier for us to say no because then we didn't have to sign any forms about it. In that way, no circumcision was almost the default choice.
Sounds familiar...
This is a result of techo-progressivism; we assume all new technology will improve our lives. Turns out that's not even close to true, but the technology that does so creates so many benefits that it's easy to attribute them to technology in general.
We're seeing the exact same thing as we've seen for the past 100 years (at least) but instead of Thalidomide and asbaetos, it's mRNA and hormonal birth control.
Science needs to be extremely conservative or it will cause more harm than good in the long run.