1 year ago26 points(+0/-0/+26Score on mirror)6 children
I can’t stand the whole “beauty is subjective” lie. Some things (actually *many* things today) are objectively ugly and are made strictly for utility and to maximize profits.
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
Or intentionally designed by (((globalists))) to demoralize Western cultures while just so happening to appear more efficient when you do not factor in the human effect of aesthetics?
There are objective criteria for esthetics and quality. For example, products have quality, food has quality, work has quality, games have quality, movies have quality.
As of esthetics in art, things like realism of a painting, colors, the craftsmanship of the drawing, the quality of the material used all matter. Taste does not influence quality, it influences what an individual likes. There are well made graphics I do not like. There are shitty things I like. That's taste. And then there are mediocre graphics I like because I happen to have them - meaning there are even external factors that influence taste.
I have like 20 chestnuts on a cabinet as decoration. They have a neat shape, a nice color, are clean and they last long. They are no work of art, and nothing exceptional, but I like having some of them as decoration. That's taste.
There is a clear distinction between quality and taste, and dismissing quality as "taste" as jews attempt to do is ridiculous.
1 year ago16 points(+0/-0/+16Score on mirror)1 child
*Anything traditional/ancestral is bad, everything communist/jewish is good. Just consume new products and forget who you are, or where you came from.*
This is text book Frankfurt school communism. The whole point is the destruction of every non-jewish culture.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It's capitalism being subverted by (((evil forces))). Both communism and capitalism are susceptible to such subversion, but communism much more. This is why the subversion is inherently communist in nature, because it provides the path of least resistance. Subversion of capitalism takes much longer because it has to erode the culture, like a culture's architecture, in ways other than state control to succeed.
Marxism itself is a subversion of communism, which has arguably existed for a very long time and had its modern roots in the English peasants revolt, the German Peasants War, and it was arguably a very coherent faction by the English Civil War.
Why England predominantly? Because norman fuckery made people naturally despise the monarchy and seek the most radical solution.
Was it called communism then? No, and it was actually extremely religious too, but it was communist, just not marxist.
Marx based his communism off of the French revolution, which itself was not particularly communist at all in actuality. It ended up being a movement of the 3rd estate bourgeoisie against the second and first estates. It had little to do with actual peasants and workers. The French revolution was capitalistic and enlightenment in origin. What he did copy from this though was the atheistic and culturally destructive aspect of it.
Which shows that marxism particularly is not concerned with actual emancipation and *actual*, non jewish, communism, but rather destruction of culture, race, religion, and mores. It would not be a particular surprise to me if that was the *only* thing that Karl Marx himself wrote about, and the rest of his theory that is concerned with the emancipation of the working class, was instead written by Friedrich Engels, the aryan who was superior to him in almost every single aspect.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
[The origin for the uniformed.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/56/%22The_Terrible_Sea_Lion%22._Wondermark_comic_strip_No._1062_by_David_Malki_%2819_September_2014%29.png)
The founders of "modern" architecture, particularly Brutalism, are all communists and jews. All of that idiotic degenerate "Dada" shit is because of Jews and useful idiots.
Anti-traditional? You mean fucking squares and straight lines? Kikes and their nuspeak. Even non-traditional would be a somewhat normal way to say it. But they can't help but reveal their motives. They actually hate beauty so it's "anti".
Plus this way the globohomos get to say, hey real life is a run down shithoke, put this vr headset on goy
Man I know what you mean.
Don't you guys love it when you're out on a walk and you see a, er, "conventionally beautiful" sunset?
As of esthetics in art, things like realism of a painting, colors, the craftsmanship of the drawing, the quality of the material used all matter. Taste does not influence quality, it influences what an individual likes. There are well made graphics I do not like. There are shitty things I like. That's taste. And then there are mediocre graphics I like because I happen to have them - meaning there are even external factors that influence taste.
I have like 20 chestnuts on a cabinet as decoration. They have a neat shape, a nice color, are clean and they last long. They are no work of art, and nothing exceptional, but I like having some of them as decoration. That's taste.
There is a clear distinction between quality and taste, and dismissing quality as "taste" as jews attempt to do is ridiculous.