New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
101
Source? (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by diogenesofthearch on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +101Score on mirror )
You must log in or sign up to comment
23 comments:
26
Fudgiethewhale on scored.co
1 year ago 26 points (+0 / -0 / +26Score on mirror ) 6 children
I can’t stand the whole “beauty is subjective” lie. Some things (actually *many* things today) are objectively ugly and are made strictly for utility and to maximize profits.
12
diogenesofthearch on scored.co
1 year ago 12 points (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror ) 1 child
Or intentionally designed by (((globalists))) to demoralize Western cultures while just so happening to appear more efficient when you do not factor in the human effect of aesthetics?
MEGAMAGAULTRA on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
When you understand that great architecture inspires men to do great things, you realize why architecture is the way it is now a days.

Plus this way the globohomos get to say, hey real life is a run down shithoke, put this vr headset on goy
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 7 points (+0 / -0 / +7Score on mirror )
Source?
Parcival on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
>I can’t stand the whole “beauty is subjective” lie.

Man I know what you mean.

Don't you guys love it when you're out on a walk and you see a, er, "conventionally beautiful" sunset?
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
There are objective criteria for esthetics and quality. For example, products have quality, food has quality, work has quality, games have quality, movies have quality.

As of esthetics in art, things like realism of a painting, colors, the craftsmanship of the drawing, the quality of the material used all matter. Taste does not influence quality, it influences what an individual likes. There are well made graphics I do not like. There are shitty things I like. That's taste. And then there are mediocre graphics I like because I happen to have them - meaning there are even external factors that influence taste.

I have like 20 chestnuts on a cabinet as decoration. They have a neat shape, a nice color, are clean and they last long. They are no work of art, and nothing exceptional, but I like having some of them as decoration. That's taste.

There is a clear distinction between quality and taste, and dismissing quality as "taste" as jews attempt to do is ridiculous.
Beebenheimer on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Some breeds of dogs are supremely ugly and have been selectively bred to be that way, on purpose. Take the hairless Chihuahua, for example.
HOGCRU on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Rest assured, they are deliberately ugly
16
ObsidianSword on scored.co
1 year ago 16 points (+0 / -0 / +16Score on mirror ) 1 child
*Anything traditional/ancestral is bad, everything communist/jewish is good. Just consume new products and forget who you are, or where you came from.*

This is text book Frankfurt school communism. The whole point is the destruction of every non-jewish culture.
LordGrimTheInvincibl on scored.co
1 year ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
These new ugly buildings in america were built by corporations though.

What does communism, an ideology that has been dead for over 30 years, have to do with it?

Communists built ugly buildings, but that was in eastern Europe.

Ugly buildings in western Europe and america were all built by corporations.

How Is capitalism not to blame?
diogenesofthearch on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror ) 1 child
It's capitalism being subverted by (((evil forces))). Both communism and capitalism are susceptible to such subversion, but communism much more. This is why the subversion is inherently communist in nature, because it provides the path of least resistance. Subversion of capitalism takes much longer because it has to erode the culture, like a culture's architecture, in ways other than state control to succeed.
devotech2 on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Marxism itself is a subversion of communism, which has arguably existed for a very long time and had its modern roots in the English peasants revolt, the German Peasants War, and it was arguably a very coherent faction by the English Civil War.

Why England predominantly? Because norman fuckery made people naturally despise the monarchy and seek the most radical solution.

Was it called communism then? No, and it was actually extremely religious too, but it was communist, just not marxist.

Marx based his communism off of the French revolution, which itself was not particularly communist at all in actuality. It ended up being a movement of the 3rd estate bourgeoisie against the second and first estates. It had little to do with actual peasants and workers. The French revolution was capitalistic and enlightenment in origin. What he did copy from this though was the atheistic and culturally destructive aspect of it.

Which shows that marxism particularly is not concerned with actual emancipation and *actual*, non jewish, communism, but rather destruction of culture, race, religion, and mores. It would not be a particular surprise to me if that was the *only* thing that Karl Marx himself wrote about, and the rest of his theory that is concerned with the emancipation of the working class, was instead written by Friedrich Engels, the aryan who was superior to him in almost every single aspect.
11
Redpilled2Depression on scored.co
1 year ago 11 points (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror ) 1 child
What qualifications do these fact checkers have on what is beauty?
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Source
USSDefiantJazz on scored.co
1 year ago 8 points (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror ) 2 children
They're [sealioning](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning).
diogenesofthearch on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror ) 1 child
[The origin for the uniformed.](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/56/%22The_Terrible_Sea_Lion%22._Wondermark_comic_strip_No._1062_by_David_Malki_%2819_September_2014%29.png)
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
Stil as stupid and without reason as ever
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
https://archive.ph/5YQtM
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 year ago 6 points (+0 / -0 / +6Score on mirror )
It's nice when these bugmen and their efforts to sterilize language accidently produce something that is more transparent about their goals.

"Anti-traditional" is much more clear about their priorities than "brutalist".
Oldpederaulfuerte on scored.co
1 year ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
The founders of "modern" architecture, particularly Brutalism, are all communists and jews. All of that idiotic degenerate "Dada" shit is because of Jews and useful idiots.
Lundynne on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
There is proof. Broken window theory
KyleIsThisTall on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Holy fuck they actually made that
Ecl1pseGST on scored.co
1 year ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
Anti-traditional? You mean fucking squares and straight lines? Kikes and their nuspeak. Even non-traditional would be a somewhat normal way to say it. But they can't help but reveal their motives. They actually hate beauty so it's "anti".
Toast message