New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
72
posted 1 year ago by GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +72Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
ApexVeritas on scored.co
1 year ago 2 points (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
There's a huge difference between optics cucking and catering your message to your audience. If the goal is to red pill, each person has to be talked to differently. The truth is the truth, but each person gets there differently, and the path must be made easier for them to walk. Most communication is non verbal, and even the words we use hold power. Our people have been conditioned to reject people and arguments with certain words, but we can convince them by using different words. Who is the better speaker, the one who just yells "IT'S THE JEWS!" over a loud speaker with antagonism and vitriol against all within earshot, or the measured man offering statistics, histories, and reasoned arguments?


I completely understand your sentiment, though. Why must we jump through hoops to convince brainwashed idiots of basic truths?


They're our brothers, and just as I would hope my people help me when I err, so too will I do it for them. We lose nothing by trying, and hope to gain more for our ranks, which in turn reduces the ranks of our enemies. Right now, we still have time, and more people can be swayed. Is it not reasonable to be as convincing as we can?
Toast message