Consume Product

[Andrew's problematic submission](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3403r0.pdf) doesn't propose a Final Solution, but it does make ominous references to The Question.

[From the writer's own explanation](http://tomazos.com/ub_question_incident.pdf), he initially had no idea and thought it was touching the undefined behavior problem itself that was the issue:
> During the presentation [...] there was what seemed to me to be an odd comment. I think I heard someone say “you should change the paper title”. Upon hearing this I didn’t really understand, I thought it was a joke about “undefined behavior” being a dirty word or something. So I giggled a little, playing along with what I perceived as a joke, and continued on with the presentation.

He thought about changing the title, but the content would still allude to The Question:

> I thought through options for drafting changes to the paper, and realized what I was thinking about was altering the semantic structure of the paper itself. The paper poses an important question about undefined behavior and so the title is correct [...] Throughout the paper it refers to “The Question” as an abbreviation for “The Undefined Behavior Question”. So even if I changed the title the paper would still refer to “The Question”, and I thought to myself, would this satisfy those complaining or do they want that changed too?

He ultimately chose to take a stand, so they holocausted him from the committee:

> I was then informed by the head of the delegation that they “fully understand that principles are important, but [...] we are at a place where the title is causing offence and objections from multiple individuals, and that is not acceptable for us.“