You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
>they did have weapons to hunt buffaloes
Primitive bows and arrows, but I would imagine the number of arrows it takes down a fully grown buffalo is significantly larger than the single shot from a gun that can down one. I dont think they even had the concept of hunting animals for sport, not out of some form of respect for nature, but because they were primarily concerned with survival. You need to be a bit beyond the stone age before you can hunt animals for sport.
Even if that were true, if they were as dumb as you think, they wouldn't have voiced any concerns, because they wouldn't have been concerned about it. Like the way niggers aren't concerned about anything that doesn't affect them in the immediate present.
Primitive bows and arrows, but I would imagine the number of arrows it takes down a fully grown buffalo is significantly larger than the single shot from a gun that can down one. I dont think they even had the concept of hunting animals for sport, not out of some form of respect for nature, but because they were primarily concerned with survival. You need to be a bit beyond the stone age before you can hunt animals for sport.