Consume Product

Hey, u/FN57 Answer these questions.

**Why would Germans even kill jews?** If jews were concentrated in camps laboring for the war effort–which the official narrative has accepted as true for many years–why kill them instead of having them continue their useful labor? In the middle of total war, labor is a precious resource. Germans are historically known for their efficiency and record keeping, yet the national socialists are supposed to have hated jews so much that they chose to kill millions of potential laborers.

**If Germans did kill millions in an organized genocide, why use such inefficient methods?** For a people so renowned for their efficiency, Germany seems to have forgotten about this principle in application to the holocaust. The claimed methods of execution–gas chambers, gas cars, ovens, electrically-charged pools–are extremely inefficient and wasteful means of execution. With millions of rounds of ammunition being produced monthly and weapons not being scarce, why would Germany not have used one bullet per jew to kill millions? They would have had the necessary materials in less than a month, using infrastructure already in place for the war effort. Firing squad executions have existed roughly since the invention of the firearm. The Soviets extensively used this method before, during, and after WWII. The resources to produce deadly gases, burn people alive, and electrocute them are far more labor and time-intensive.

**Why are so-called “eyewitness accounts” given such weight and believed to be so trustworthy?** In modern criminal courts, eyewitness testimony is not counted as evidence with the greatest weight, particularly if there is a conflict of interest and they are also victims. Yet when it comes to the holocaust, the only evidence claimed to be needed is the word of the self-reported victims, without evidence or substantiation. This is a serious lapse in historical and public integrity, yet it is never discussed. Worse, dozens of these “eyewitnesses” have publicly admitted to lying outright and fabricating their claims–such as the hoax of soap “being made from fat” and lampshades “being made from skin.” If it is possible for eyewitnesses to lie about these events, isn’t it possible for them to lie about other events? Further, if it is possible for these eyewitnesses to lie about anything, isn’t it possible for other eyewitnesses to be lying, too? Why is no weight given to the effects of trauma and group psychology, such as would be considered when examining the testimonies of eyewitnesses in criminal cases? Eyewitness testimonies are rarely fully accurate. Often, they will wildly differ–exaggerating some facts, downplaying or outright omitting others, and sometimes even creating details entirely. Yet in the holocaust there is no consideration. Claims against the Germans are taken at face value.

**Why are the only purported death camps the ones investigated by the Soviets?** Of all the concentration camps investigated, only camps specifically investigated by the Soviets–in zones of Europe the Western Allies were forbidden from entering–are claimed to be “death camps.” By choosing to believe this claim, we put our faith in Soviet claims of German atrocities. After the fall of the USSR in 1991, many Soviet records were released to the public of its constituent countries and the Western world. From these documents, we discovered the Soviets blamed many of their own war crimes on Germans, entirely fabricated other claims, and instigated countless more atrocities than could ever have been attributed to Germans. In the face of this, do we know that the claims about the holocaust–made by the jew-controlled USSR–are valid? Should we really be giving them so much weight?

**Why are only the supposed jewish victims of the supposed holocaust discussed?** Even according to the official narrative, jews were not the only victims of German “death camps.” Yet they receive near-exclusive focus. Where are the tears shed for the millions of Poles claimed to be killed or the hundreds of thousands of Russians and other Slavs, even those murdered by their own USSR? Where are the museums, novels, and commemorations for these victims? If the holocaust is truly such a horrifying event that it must live “forever” in our memories, lest it be repeated, why are so many of its claimed victims forgotten? Why does Israel go so far as to deny the Armenian Christian genocide by the Ottoman Turks and the Holodomor–the starvation of millions of Ukrainians by the USSR?

**Questions of Logic:** How did ✡Elie Wiesel✡ and countless other jews survive the holocaust if the intention was to eliminate every jew? Wiesel was a prisoner for several years; other jews survived even longer. Most of these inmates were ordinary people who did not have any unique expertise the Germans could have exploited. If the goal was extermination–even if the goal only became extermination in the last year of the war and not when the camps were first built–why were they kept alive until the war’s end? Jews could simply have been starved or denied water. They would have died in weeks or mere days. No gas chambers–or even bullets–required. Scholars have expressed concerns about remembering the holocaust after the last survivors die. Why haven’t Civil War historians expressed similar concerns since the last survivor of that conflict died in 1959? “Proof” of the holocaust rests primarily on survivor testimony. There is little, if any, hard evidence. The best of this was described by pharmacist Jean Claude Pressac as merely “criminal traces.” Even Judge Charles Grey, presiding over the Irving-Lipstadt Trial, commented that he was surprised the evidence pointing to the holocaust was “extremely thin.”

**Questions of Records:** Why is there no mention of the holocaust anywhere in Winston Churchill’s six-volume History of the Second World War, the wartime memoirs of Dwight Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe, nor those of Charles De Gaulle or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote about the Second World War?
Keep in mind that their books were written years after the war ended and thus after the holocaust was brought to public discourse by the Nuremberg trials. Why does the 1947 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica–a complete physical copy of which your author went to the trouble of purchasing–make no mention of the holocaust happening or an extermination of jews occurring during WWII or at any other time, despite the war having been concluded for two years? Regarding the holocaust, the silence of these cognoscenti is deafening.

**Why, after more than seventy years, have historians been unable to produce a single German document that points to the holocaust being planned, ordered, or carried out?** All of Germany’s wartime encryptions were broken, including the one used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. These messages were intercepted by the British intelligence service at Bletchley Park. The transcriptions say nothing whatsoever about mass executions or even suggest that a program of genocide existed. It has been insisted that Germans used euphemisms when discussing genocide–e.g. “final solution,” “special treatment,” “resettlement,” etc. Why were these euphemisms necessary when communicating with each other using wartime encryption? If they thought the Allies had cracked their codes, why would they continue to use them? Why do the wartime camp inspection reports made by the International Red Cross contain no references to mass executions? Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of jews were exterminated in “massive steam chambers” or electrocuted on special grids? “Evidence” of this was presented at Nuremberg that sent men to the gallows.

**Questions of Camps:** If Auschwitz was a death camp, why did it have an infirmary specifically for inmates? Why did it have a brothel for them? Why would the Germans ship jews across hundreds of miles of European terrain–thereby using valuable personnel and trains which could have carried other supplies–while fighting a war on two fronts? Why move jews at all–least of all to special camps with barracks for them–to kill them when a single bullet to the head upon discovery would have been far more efficient? Initially, claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of pre-war Germany (e.g. Dachau and Bergen-Belsen). “Evidence” of this was presented at the same time as that of the current “official” camps–located in occupied Poland. In the early 1960s, without explanation, it was publicly admitted that these camps did not engage in executions. The only “death camps” were behind the Iron Curtain.

**Questions of Numbers:** Why is it still insisted upon that 6,000,000 jews were killed when the official jewish death toll at Auschwitz–the flagship camp–has been reduced from the post-war figure of 4,000,000 to a figure of fewer than 1,000,000? How can 6,000,000 have still died, and why do we believe that the other camps’ claimed numbers are not false? The death toll for the holocaust relies exclusively on population statistics provided by jewish sources; has any independent demographic study been produced that shows that approximately six million Jews were “missing” at the end of the war?

**Questions of Physics:** All liberated camps were littered with corpses. Was a single autopsy report conducted, or any other forensic evidence obtained, which shows that so much as one of these deaths was the consequence of poison gas? Carbon monoxide–claimed to be used in gassings–is proven to cover a corpse with red mottling. Why, then, did all eyewitness reports state the corpses they saw were blue? Nor has anyone been able to reconcile “eyewitness accounts” that personnel entered the gas chambers after only 20 minutes without any protective gear with the fact that Zyklon B is a “time release” fumigant that has a lethal capability for at least 24 hours. After 24 hours, the corpses would have remained sufficiently contaminated by hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have killed anyone who touched them who was not wearing protective gear.

Why do I know that you won’t even pretend to answer a single one of these questions? Why haven’t you committed suicide yet for being such a humiliation to your family and race?

The funniest part is, who gives a shit who built it or when? The "nazi death camp" allowed their prisoners to use it recreationally, they also had a theater complete with costumes and props, they also had a maternity ward, they also played sports ball...

This is all on video as well, not just testimonies.

No Zyklon-B residue has ever been found in the "gas chamber" building with wide gaps around the wooden door with a single pane glass window and vent holes in the roof that didn't exist, via aerial photos, until after the jewish bosheviks captured the camp and rebuilt significant portions of it after the allied bombings cut-off the supply lines to the camp, directly causing the deaths of thousands of prisoners (NOT millions) by way of starvation.

Plenty of Zyklon-B residue *was*, however, found in the delousing buildings, so much in fact that those buildings are still closed to the public today as they're deemed dangerous.

What were the delousing buildings for? All the luggage, clothes, shoes, and non-valuable belongings brought by prisoners were deloused in two buildings because they were arriving with mites that were killing everyone (including the nazi prison guards) because of the typhus outbreak during the war.

So the prisoners were issued standard prison uniforms. The deloused clothes, shoes, and luggage became the source of the propaganda photos, since there were no mass graves or cremated remains that could be used for propaganda by the jewish bolsheviks who captured the camp late in the war.

Oh yea, not one "death camp" was liberated by Allied forces, only the jewish bolsheviks happened to capture any "death camps". That's... really convenient.

Imagine nitpicking about something like that. 😂 even if he were right.

how do you manage to read 1 comment from a guy like that without blocking him immediately?

But the pool was used as an execution device! My grandpa saw the carnage: jews would be invited to swim, and then a guard would toss a Reichspfennig (penny) into the water, and the jews would drown each other trying to be the one who got it!