Pretty much every devastating policy, law, or agency was not voted on or, if it was, was overturned by a (((judge))) if it didn't go how the jew wanted. And how often do our "elected" representatives vote for what their constituents actually want or what is truly in their best interest?
The prop 14 mentioned in op, faggot "marriage", abortions, Federal Reserve, Hart-Celler Act/immigration, no-fault divorce, integration, funding Israel, etc...
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
The same thing happened in California with Prop. 187, which would have denied all services and assistance, such as welfare and health care, to illegal immigrants.
1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
Same thing with faggotry, calis voted to outlaw it and a (((judge))) overturned the law, then a bunch of other (((judges))) on the supreme court extended that ruling to the entire country despite such an action being a blatant overreach of their power and a violation of the 10th amendment.
The faggot marriage case was about states must recognize other states licenses. That's why drivers can drive around the US with 1 states license, even tho states tests are different.
The court correctly ruled that it applies with marriage licenses, it never forced any church or person to perform a marriage.
Of course. The left doesn't care about logic, because carry concealed permits aren't recognized by all states like they should be (most states recognize the 2A as your permit)
The prop 14 mentioned in op, faggot "marriage", abortions, Federal Reserve, Hart-Celler Act/immigration, no-fault divorce, integration, funding Israel, etc...