New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Almost everybody has a different line on where they would consider Whiteness to end. For example, I've seen some people say Turks aren't White, or that Northern Africans (because of Roman occupation and colonization) are. I'm pretty sure Nazi Germany believed Slavs were not White. I'm interested to know where YOU draw the line, because there is rarely a consensus reached, and I rarely if ever see this asked.

Just please don't start a flamewar in the comments, I don't wanna come back to this post and see a bunch of arguing. Keep it respectable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
>Nordic phenotypes

literally a rarity in their current genetic disposition

most Russians don't look nordic, **they look slavic** with a tinge of asiatic (because of the mass bolshivik rapes of the (((red))) uprising)

 >as well as Ukraine that mixed with turks

the thing is... Ukranians in general look a lot Whiter and less asiatic than Russians, they're basically more Russian than Russians despite the fact they hate Russia

>aren't you some kind of romanian mountain nigger?

would a Romanian mountain nigger be as racist as i am? big fucking doubt

[also coming from a guy who thinks "Horses are dangerous" the non-Whiteness begins with you alone](https://unscored.arete.network/c/ConsumeProduct/p/199hlLD4SM/)

deleted 1 year ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Toast message