New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
Almost everybody has a different line on where they would consider Whiteness to end. For example, I've seen some people say Turks aren't White, or that Northern Africans (because of Roman occupation and colonization) are. I'm pretty sure Nazi Germany believed Slavs were not White. I'm interested to know where YOU draw the line, because there is rarely a consensus reached, and I rarely if ever see this asked.

Just please don't start a flamewar in the comments, I don't wanna come back to this post and see a bunch of arguing. Keep it respectable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
TallestSkil on scored.co
1 year ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
You know, I really don’t know anymore. Kind of important for me to find out, honestly. It’s one of the last things in my book that I don’t have *truly* cited. It’s a PCA chart of the genetic distance between the subspecies (whites, jews, arabs) and ethnicities within *Homo europeansis*. Here’s a (very simplified) 2D [map for global genetics.](https://i.postimg.cc/Jrcn9Q3q/PCA-Global.png) Two dimensions can only show the delineation between *Homo europeansis*, *Homo africanis*, and *Homo asiatis*. *Homo americanis* and *Homo australis* clusters are “flattened” on top, but they also have species-level genetic distance markers. I have an animated gif of a 3D plot, but I can’t seem to get it to animate when uploaded.
Toast message