Anyone who does not love their own is worse than an unbeliever
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
36 comments:
"Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set[a] a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’"
Matthew 10:34-36 NKJV
“If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple."
Luke 14:26 NKJV
Ditch the king of jews.
Matthew 10:34-36 NKJV
“If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple."
Luke 14:26 NKJV
Ditch the king of jews.
The Greek word used in that passage, translated to "hate", can also mean "reject". That passage is about proper prioritization. It doesn't mean to wholly reject your family, but to prioritize God above them.
The message is identical to when your family embraces lies and falsehoods. If you prioritize truth above all else, and your family embraces a lie or falsehood, you should still prioritize, espouse, and act in truth, even if you love your family, even though they reject it.
The message is identical to when your family embraces lies and falsehoods. If you prioritize truth above all else, and your family embraces a lie or falsehood, you should still prioritize, espouse, and act in truth, even if you love your family, even though they reject it.
Look, Himmlerwasright is back. I explained this to you in another thread. How the command to hate one's own must be understood to mean that love of Christ comes first, no matter what. Such hyperbole was not unknown in the ancient world. A literal interpretation of this would result in a host of contradictions, so that's obviously the wrong answer.
Stone Choir - On Human Race https://s.stone-choir.com/stone-choir/audio.cdn.stone-choir.com/e0015.m4a
>We are all sons of Adam — no Christian can deny this. However, we are not all sons of Japheth, nor are we all sons of Ham, and nor are we all sons of Shem. The descent of the nations (i.e., races) of man are given in the Table of Nations (Genesis 10). Nature is entirely in accord with Scripture. The nations can be seen in a number of ways — geographically, genotypically, behaviorally.
>In this episode, we will be covering the fundamentals of human race. In a future episode, we will cover the theological import of these facts (if you are looking for Galatians 3:28 , please wait for that future episode). This topic makes many Christians uncomfortable, but discomfort is not the standard — truth is. Test what we say against Scripture and against the natural facts.
>Nothing we say in this episode (except some of the scientific matters) would sound at all out of place to the overwhelming majority of your ancestors — yes, even the Christian ones. So you must ask yourself: Was the Church and every Christian wrong for thousands of years or has the modern world drifted away from the truth? We can give you the information, but you must make that decision for yourself.
As we will cover in the episode, there are four categories of men when it comes to understanding and accepting the reality of race:
>the Atheist/Evolutionist (who can prove race from the science, but often denies it nonetheless);
>the Marxist (who once affirmed the reality of race, but now denies it for political purposes);
the naïve Christian or otherwise (who holds 'one race, the human race', parroting the second category, perhaps unwittingly); and
the Christian who affirms the reality of God's created order, which includes race.
>We are firmly in the fourth category. Listen carefully, and join us. God's truth is always better than whatever anyone else can promise.
>We are all sons of Adam — no Christian can deny this. However, we are not all sons of Japheth, nor are we all sons of Ham, and nor are we all sons of Shem. The descent of the nations (i.e., races) of man are given in the Table of Nations (Genesis 10). Nature is entirely in accord with Scripture. The nations can be seen in a number of ways — geographically, genotypically, behaviorally.
>In this episode, we will be covering the fundamentals of human race. In a future episode, we will cover the theological import of these facts (if you are looking for Galatians 3:28 , please wait for that future episode). This topic makes many Christians uncomfortable, but discomfort is not the standard — truth is. Test what we say against Scripture and against the natural facts.
>Nothing we say in this episode (except some of the scientific matters) would sound at all out of place to the overwhelming majority of your ancestors — yes, even the Christian ones. So you must ask yourself: Was the Church and every Christian wrong for thousands of years or has the modern world drifted away from the truth? We can give you the information, but you must make that decision for yourself.
As we will cover in the episode, there are four categories of men when it comes to understanding and accepting the reality of race:
>the Atheist/Evolutionist (who can prove race from the science, but often denies it nonetheless);
>the Marxist (who once affirmed the reality of race, but now denies it for political purposes);
the naïve Christian or otherwise (who holds 'one race, the human race', parroting the second category, perhaps unwittingly); and
the Christian who affirms the reality of God's created order, which includes race.
>We are firmly in the fourth category. Listen carefully, and join us. God's truth is always better than whatever anyone else can promise.
Just to ask. Not to start shit or be condescending. Wasn’t Jesus a Jew tho? I mean I hate kikes but how can you worship Jesus and say you hate Jews? I never get a clear answer on that ever.
The kikes of today have exceedingly little in common with the israelites of Jesus' time. In their own media they [acknowledge](https://files.catbox.moe/ykfrf8.png) this fact. The kikes of today simply assumed the mantle in a bid to trick Christians, go figure. They fundamentally ***are not jews***. The ethnic group that calls themselves the jews today fundamentally *did not exist* prior to 70AD, more or less. Their progenitors, a.k.a. the Synagogue of Satan (Rev. 2:9 and 3:9), were the pharisees, sadducees, and all the other people Jesus spent His entire ministry preaching against. He too even called them the children of Satan, in John chapter 8. But the Roman-jewish wars between 70 and 132 AD beginning with the destruction of the second temple and culminating in Hadrian's massacres was the single event that cemented the jews' intense visceral hatred for Whites into their collective genetic psyche, and the Romans' adoption of Christianity and by extension the rest of Europe a mere 2 centuries later only served to seal the deal. This was their direct divine comeuppance for killing Jesus, as He foretold the destruction of the temple. After this time period with the birth of "rabbinic judaism" is when the kikes mutated the jewish religion of the time into the goyim-destruction machine we see today. And then with the subsequent babylonian exile and the kikes' formulation of the talmud and the rest of their satanic black magic, we can see quite clearly and definitively how divergent this new group of "jews" really was and is. Add to that the better part of 2,000 years of inbreeding and devil worship and we arrive at the twisted genetic abomination that is the kikes of the modern era. Something Jesus was *entirely* separated and apart from.
I think it is important to recognise that we don’t hate Jews for being Jews. We hate them for killing Christ, conspiring against our countries and people and worshipping satan. Just as we don’t hate Indians for being Indian, we hate them for migrating here and ruining our countries. It’s also important to recognise that Judaism then and now are two completely different beasts.
Jesus was ethnically Jewish because God stated that He would be from the line of David and would be born in Galilee (2 Samuel 7 and Isaiah 9:1-6) - this is where the Jewishness stops. Religiously He was not Jewish you can see this by His message (i.e., Christianity) and the fact that He was excommunicated and executed by his Jewish „co-ethnics“.
Jesus was ethnically Jewish because God stated that He would be from the line of David and would be born in Galilee (2 Samuel 7 and Isaiah 9:1-6) - this is where the Jewishness stops. Religiously He was not Jewish you can see this by His message (i.e., Christianity) and the fact that He was excommunicated and executed by his Jewish „co-ethnics“.
Thank you for an actual answer! I’ve been starting to study Christianity lately. I have been trying to learn in a less judeo Christian way as well cause personally I feel if they can alternate history in general they may have alternated quite a few facts about Jesus too
Well you got your work cut out for you, I'll give you that. It's gonna be hard to learn the fundamentals *without* learning it the kosher way, but its hard to filter out all the kosher stuff if you don't already have a stable knowledge of the fundamentals. I would be happy to answer any other questions you may have.
Hitler was a christian, but then again he was also a vegan, so there's that. There is also conflicting info on the subject of his religious beliefs.
Imagine if he actually ate meat
he would've masscared the anglo-niggers at Dunkirk and took some hostages to make sure [the jews of Europe](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/qwdqzfx6.png) would've been too demoralize to Invade Germany
also no work camps, kikes would be systematically turned into ash, thus preventing future generations of no good yids to defame Germany
problem is... even with England weakened or demoralized
how do you deal with giga-nigger nations like Russia or America? despite their better arms & armor Germany was a tiny, tiny fucking country in comparison to those Empires
my guess would be to rush Nuke technology
he would've masscared the anglo-niggers at Dunkirk and took some hostages to make sure [the jews of Europe](https://pomf2.lain.la/f/qwdqzfx6.png) would've been too demoralize to Invade Germany
also no work camps, kikes would be systematically turned into ash, thus preventing future generations of no good yids to defame Germany
problem is... even with England weakened or demoralized
how do you deal with giga-nigger nations like Russia or America? despite their better arms & armor Germany was a tiny, tiny fucking country in comparison to those Empires
my guess would be to rush Nuke technology
I blame Hitler's dietitian for the fall of the reich. Was probably a crypto-jew sabateur. Every single time. Hitler's lack of a protein meat diet led to cloudy brain function, lower energy, reduced testosterone levels that took a toll and reduced him to a bunker under siege. If eating steak medium rare he would have stampeded over soviets and run circles around brits and americans on the west front.
>Hitler's dietitian
who was he exactly?
who was he exactly?
Constanze Manziarly?
>The 1947 American book Who Killed Hitler? implies that Manziarly possessed exclusive knowledge of a Hitler lookalike seen in her kitchen prior to the collapse of Berlin, who was supposedly meant to ensure the dictator's survival. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constanze_Manziarly
A woman of course. Adam meet Eve. She talks to snakes.
>The 1947 American book Who Killed Hitler? implies that Manziarly possessed exclusive knowledge of a Hitler lookalike seen in her kitchen prior to the collapse of Berlin, who was supposedly meant to ensure the dictator's survival. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constanze_Manziarly
A woman of course. Adam meet Eve. She talks to snakes.
Tell me you haven't read Hitler without telling me.
HE REMOVED 90% OF THE BIBLE, BRO. That's how he cut out the jewish parts.
HE REMOVED 90% OF THE BIBLE, BRO. That's how he cut out the jewish parts.
The Christian faith IS jew worship. It's doctrine, not heresy.
That's why they invented the psyop, that's why they keep it active. The Christian faith is the strongest correlate with support for Israel.
They hate Christianity the way an abusive slave master hates slavery. Not at all, until you suggest *they* should be a slave.
The WHITE RACE needs to be cleansed of ALL jew worship INCLUDING Christianity.
That's why they invented the psyop, that's why they keep it active. The Christian faith is the strongest correlate with support for Israel.
They hate Christianity the way an abusive slave master hates slavery. Not at all, until you suggest *they* should be a slave.
The WHITE RACE needs to be cleansed of ALL jew worship INCLUDING Christianity.
Not sure i agree. Most of history Christians were in opposition to jewry. Jew banking monopolies is a product of the 19th century and industrialization. Zionism is only about 150 years old. Throughout most of Christendom it can be shown that Christians were in conflict with jewry and are recorded as being hostile toward them and publicly condemning them in letters and public speeches and in recorded court proceedings.
It's quite the opposite, and anything you think makes the OT jewish can be addressed. Christianity is awesome, it's racist and all our race lives forever with Christ destroying every non in existence. Just because modern churches have been subverted doesn't change that.
Why did OT God establish his covenant by ordering the genital mutilation of Abraham and his descendants, of all things? Something the jews still do today.
If there really is an explanation for that, then okay, but I've yet to hear a good one from a Christian. And Genesis itself offers no explanation. When I look at that text through the context of the fact that it was thought up and written down by a human being, can you really blame me for thinking it sounds like it came from a very jewish psyche? Given their proclivity for messing with kids' dicks and all that.
>inb4 The New Covenant
I know. I'm asking why did the covenant *ever* take the form of slicing up a child's penis? Sounds messed up to me.
If there really is an explanation for that, then okay, but I've yet to hear a good one from a Christian. And Genesis itself offers no explanation. When I look at that text through the context of the fact that it was thought up and written down by a human being, can you really blame me for thinking it sounds like it came from a very jewish psyche? Given their proclivity for messing with kids' dicks and all that.
>inb4 The New Covenant
I know. I'm asking why did the covenant *ever* take the form of slicing up a child's penis? Sounds messed up to me.
It was so our people would know who to marry and who not to, but it was likely different from what we do today. Josephus says "they hid the circumcision of their genitals so that even when naked they might appear as Greeks". I can't see anyone with modern circumcision doing that even if they wanted to.
That's the best I've got for that one, got any more? I could always share where I hear things like this so you can look for yourself, but the material is very long. It's in audio format thankfully.
That's the best I've got for that one, got any more? I could always share where I hear things like this so you can look for yourself, but the material is very long. It's in audio format thankfully.
Toast message
This is the exact reason why The Third Reich created their own de-jewified version of Christianity called POSITIVE CHRISTIANITY.
https://www.texemarrs.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=catalog&Product_Code=bboa_holocaust_hoax&Category_Code=
Nobody lost their shit over it and my gift went over surprisingly well. However, I was mentally willing to get booted for my attempt to expose kikery.