You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
PurestEvil on scored.co
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Which is still an ad hominem, avoiding the matter itself. It doesn't matter who came up with these theories, it could be a saint, it could be the dirtiest pajeet-nigger hybrid, it could be the smartest man in history, some turbo-kike or a literal dog. We do not have to go "trust me bro" on it. In fact they as persons are entirely irrelevant, as it should be.
The only question is if it is true, false, plausible, implausible.
Evolution is very plausible. A lot of things make sense, some are even obvious. How life emerged from non-life is unclear. Big Bang is somewhat plausible, but it's of trivial relevance to us, forever, and not provable anyway (alternatives neither).
Glad you are so certain about it. It's just that there is a near 0% chance that something like that could ever happen because it is literal magic.
And what, two humans existed and then they reproduced a LOT, and then their children did crazy levels of incest for generations? And then somehow pajeets, sandniggers, niggers, chinks, abos, kikes and whatnot emerged which were similar to humans and could interbreed to create mongrels?
It doesn't make sense on multiple levels. The moment you activate brain it all falls apart.
I am not looking to disprove anything. And I target Christianity in this case because it applies, and also other religions are garbage and not noteworthy anyways.
But how do YOU prove your points? You ignore my arguments and make no arguments either. What am I supposed to do with that?
What about the incest thing for example? And the shitraces?
The only question is if it is true, false, plausible, implausible.
Evolution is very plausible. A lot of things make sense, some are even obvious. How life emerged from non-life is unclear. Big Bang is somewhat plausible, but it's of trivial relevance to us, forever, and not provable anyway (alternatives neither).
And what, two humans existed and then they reproduced a LOT, and then their children did crazy levels of incest for generations? And then somehow pajeets, sandniggers, niggers, chinks, abos, kikes and whatnot emerged which were similar to humans and could interbreed to create mongrels?
It doesn't make sense on multiple levels. The moment you activate brain it all falls apart.
But how do YOU prove your points? You ignore my arguments and make no arguments either. What am I supposed to do with that?
What about the incest thing for example? And the shitraces?