This is concerning Jewish actions and Judaism. Someone saying but not all jews did that or not all jews follow Judaism is true, but jews still need to be eradicated, but how can I say that without the not all argument getting in the way?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
WhatWouldMountainDew on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
You have to qualify if you're talking about a group or individuals.
The argument about jews, blacks, pajeets, etc has never been "every single one of them is bad that's why they must be expelled". The argument is "as a group they are bad". I don't care if Brother Nathaniel is good, I don't care if Jesse Peterson is good, I don't care if... an Indian could be hypothetically good, they can be good around their own people in their own country.
The Torah isnt the issue, its the Talmud and especially the Zohar that are the issue. If the jews simply followed the Torah, they would ok, but the issue is that they *dont*.
The argument about jews, blacks, pajeets, etc has never been "every single one of them is bad that's why they must be expelled". The argument is "as a group they are bad". I don't care if Brother Nathaniel is good, I don't care if Jesse Peterson is good, I don't care if... an Indian could be hypothetically good, they can be good around their own people in their own country.
So it literally is all jews. Some are better at pretending it's not them than others.
There are no good ones.