This is concerning Jewish actions and Judaism. Someone saying but not all jews did that or not all jews follow Judaism is true, but jews still need to be eradicated, but how can I say that without the not all argument getting in the way?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)3 children
Exceptions prove the rule, if they weren't notably out of the ordinary then they wouldn't be exceptions.
Stops pilpul and "but what about the .000000001% that aren't....." bullshit right in it's tracks.
1 year ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
That's not what "exception proves the rule" means.
"No parking on Sunday"
That is an exception. That exception proves the rule that parking is allowed Mon-Sat.
It is why Mitch Hedberg's joke "I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to as well." works because he presents the exception, and also disproves the rule.
There is nothing incorrect in that article (no profit in it, monetary or otherwise). Though I do see those kike faggots once again have their hand out begging for shekels.
When I use the phrase, I'm talking specifically about the common pilpul tactic kikes and their shabbos goys who try to emulate them employ: bringing up some aberration in an argument in such a way that is meant to invalidate the rule itself. IE- "Not every single studio head in hollywood & board of directors at media companies is a slimy bagel fucker kike, so your entire argument has been defeated!"
Of course that's not what they are explicitly saying, but it is what they mean. Especially if there is an audience, a la social media.
In this context, the way I respond "Exceptions prove the rule, if they weren't notably out of the ordinary then they wouldn't be exceptions." easily parries that tactic, is simple and straightforward for most anyone in the peanut gallery to grasp, and the kike cannot quibble over it.
Stops pilpul and "but what about the .000000001% that aren't....." bullshit right in it's tracks.
"No parking on Sunday"
That is an exception. That exception proves the rule that parking is allowed Mon-Sat.
It is why Mitch Hedberg's joke "I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to as well." works because he presents the exception, and also disproves the rule.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
There is nothing incorrect in that article (no profit in it, monetary or otherwise). Though I do see those kike faggots once again have their hand out begging for shekels.
When I use the phrase, I'm talking specifically about the common pilpul tactic kikes and their shabbos goys who try to emulate them employ: bringing up some aberration in an argument in such a way that is meant to invalidate the rule itself. IE- "Not every single studio head in hollywood & board of directors at media companies is a slimy bagel fucker kike, so your entire argument has been defeated!"
Of course that's not what they are explicitly saying, but it is what they mean. Especially if there is an audience, a la social media.
In this context, the way I respond "Exceptions prove the rule, if they weren't notably out of the ordinary then they wouldn't be exceptions." easily parries that tactic, is simple and straightforward for most anyone in the peanut gallery to grasp, and the kike cannot quibble over it.
do "begging the question" next
Interesting. If only there were a term for that...