You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
SectionApeRiot on scored.co
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)6 children
Off the top of my head:
- He's stated on multiple occasions that he wants to expand legal immigration, to include automatically giving citizenship to those who go to college.
- He supports genital mutilation for children so long as parents consent. He, in general, supports LGBTQabcdefg123+ degeneracy.
- He instituted the bumpstock ban.
"Take the guns first, go through due process second."
- Platinum plan; worships every race except for the one that "voted" him in.
- Operation warp speed and Trump bucks; 40% of all US dollars were printed in 2020 and 2021 alone.
- Terrible supreme court picks, among virtually every other pick he made. Once is a mistake, twice is odd, three or more times is a pattern.
- Wants to make antisemitism illegal. Has literally said "make Israel great again". Lamented that jews don't have the same influence over our legislative branch that they used to.
Etc.
Edit:
Couple more popped into my head after saving.
- He pardoned ponzi scheme jews and nigger rappers rather than Julian Assange or other far more worthy candidates.
- Told everyone to go home Jan 6th and then proceeded to ignore many of his supporters as they rotted in prison and got railroaded.
Everything you listed is true, and the crazy part is that he’s still further right then the rest of Washington. It’s fucking terrifying. We all know everything is F&G now, but it’s scary to think that in 2008 the nigger was openly further right in many ways then many republicans/conservatives are today.
This is a trojan horse. Right now they are doing transitions without consent. And note that rarely, rarely do BOTH parents consent to this sort of thing. Making teachers tell parents they are transitioning their kids will be a BIG win.
Besides, many states are declaring transitioning as medical malpractice. All it takes is one word from the FDA and it's all over. (Oh, they already banned those drugs for transitioning? WEIRD!)
Problem is there are plenty of cases of single mothers pushing their children into it and there's no father in the picture to object. We shouldn't be pushing further left with "well as long as the parents consent". It should be a resounding "absolutely no child will be mutilated, with or without parental consent". The right has been giving inches like that for decades (centuries really) and it never goes back, it just stays there until the left goes further and the right gives a few more inches. Next thing we know we're miles down the road.
I didn't find anything about FDA banning "transitioning" drugs. Are they banned or just not approved? It'd be great if they are.
That means we need to go to the NATURAL mother and the NATURAL father and have them sign a form saying that they permit transition. That's what "consent of the parentS" means.
If the mother remarries, it doesn't matter. Until the new father adopts the kid and the natural father relinquishes his rights to the new adopted father -- he has to sign off on everything.
This is HUGE because it also means women can't transition kids without dad knowing about it!
There's a fair number who don't know who the father is, father gave up rights, woman went to a sperm bank, or the woman didn't put him on the birth certificate at all. The last one seems to be becoming more common to get more welfare, maybe? I know of at least three women that have done it for welfare and free healthcare. One case was done, I think, so the father wouldn't have to pay child support if something happened. Well, they split and now he has no legal right over the child. I'm sure he could probably try to pursue rights through a DNA test, but he won't.
It'll also depend on how they move forward with it. Parental consent can be interpreted as one or both parents.
But that's also part of my point. If it's so rare to get both parents approval, why not just try to make it outright illegal, with or without the parent(s)? No one, not even the parents, should have the authority to mutilate their child. It's just the slow march further left. Doing half measures and compromises so that people think something is being done when really they're just normalizing what would have been unthinkable a few years before. It's what's gotten us here.
Then he turned to the FEDERAL RESERVE and said "WRITE CHECKS TO THE PEOPLE IN MY NAME FROM **YOUR** MONEY" and they had to.
It didn't cost the federal government a dime. It showed the world that the executive branch and the president could force the federal reserve to spend their own reserves!
No new debt from it. No congressional approval. Free money, payable by the FED! And no, they could not print it. They had to take it out of their own bank account.
Haha, I wish. Though I did enjoy your narration of it; gave me a chuckle. Jews never give out money to the goyim without some sort of return and they would never let a figurehead order them around.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stimulus checks (aka Trump bucks) were part of the CARES Act that Congress approved. It didn't cost the federal government a dime because the federal government doesn't produce anything or actually make any money, only takes from the people and racks up debt, as I'm sure we're both painfully familiar with. You're correct in that CARES didn't result in physical money printed or an increase in the overall money supply, but it did create "digital money" that was disbursed by the Treasury/IRS and was essentially borrowing against future funds (taxes), bonds/securities, etc. and greatly increased the national deficit.
Here's what chat GPT gives me when asking for a synopsis (I don't 100% trust what it says, for obvious reasons). If you have a good/better place to read more on this, I'll be happy to check it out.
"The CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) stimulus checks were funded through government borrowing. Specifically, the U.S. government issued new debt to finance the $2.2 trillion package, which included direct stimulus payments, unemployment benefits, small business loans, and other relief measures.
Here’s a breakdown of how the stimulus checks were funded and the broader financial mechanics:
1. Borrowing from the Financial Markets:
The primary way the U.S. government funded the CARES Act — including the stimulus checks — was through borrowing. The federal government does not have the funds sitting in a savings account for emergencies like these. Instead, it borrows money by issuing Treasury bonds, notes, and bills.
When the government borrows money, it sells these securities to investors, both domestic and foreign. Investors lend the government money in exchange for a promise to pay it back with interest at a later date.
The interest rate on these government securities is relatively low because the U.S. is seen as a low-risk borrower. So, during times of economic crisis, the government can borrow at a favorable rate.
2. Increased Government Debt:
The CARES Act, with its $2.2 trillion price tag, significantly increased the national debt. To pay for the various stimulus measures — including direct payments to individuals, enhanced unemployment benefits, and small business assistance — the government had to issue a large amount of new debt.
This borrowing added to the federal deficit, which is the difference between what the government spends and what it collects in revenue (taxes, etc.). The debt issued as part of the CARES Act was essentially a temporary increase in the deficit, intended to support the economy during the crisis.
3. Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve’s Role:
The Federal Reserve also played a key role in supporting the funding of the CARES Act. While the Fed didn’t directly fund the stimulus checks, it did help the government finance the massive borrowing by keeping interest rates low and engaging in quantitative easing.
Quantitative easing (QE) involves the Fed purchasing government bonds and other securities on the open market, which increases the money supply and helps keep borrowing costs low for the U.S. government.
The Fed also created new money in the form of digital reserves to support the financial system during the crisis, but this was separate from the direct funding of stimulus checks. It helped ensure that borrowing remained affordable and that liquidity was available for financial markets and institutions.
4. The Role of Tax Revenue (Long-Term):
In the short term, the government does not immediately have to raise taxes to cover the cost of the stimulus checks. However, in the long term, the U.S. government will need to either reduce spending or increase tax revenue to service the higher debt load that resulted from borrowing to fund the CARES Act and other pandemic-related measures.
While the immediate relief was funded through borrowing, the long-term financing of that debt (interest payments, principal repayment, etc.) will be borne by future taxpayers.
Key Points:
Borrowing from financial markets was the primary way the government funded the stimulus checks and other parts of the CARES Act.
The federal deficit and national debt increased as a result of the stimulus, with the government issuing Treasury securities to finance the relief package.
The Federal Reserve facilitated this process by keeping interest rates low and engaging in monetary policy measures like quantitative easing.
In Summary:
The stimulus checks were not paid for out of existing government savings or funds but were instead financed through new borrowing by the U.S. government. The government issued debt, which was bought by investors, and used those funds to finance the economic relief programs, including direct payments to individuals. While this helped provide immediate relief during the pandemic, it also increased the federal debt, which will need to be managed in the years to come."
I do appreciate the additional reading, but that looks to be Q silliness. A lot if it is outright wrong. The "Patriots" were/are not in control.
You can't nationalize the Fed because it's entire creation and existence is meant to shield jew bankers from being beholden to the people and to turn the goyim into free range tax slaves through usury. They won't just give that up because their shabbos goy puppet told them to. Unless the Rothschilds and jews worldwide have been imprisoned (or better) and their assets seized, the Fed is not under control by anyone other than jews.
Literally not a single thing they mentioned here happened and that was back in 2020:
"We just restructured the Federal Reserve System. Basically the Federal Reserve will buy out the U.S. debt to the tune of over 2 trillion per month; making the U.S. debt-free by around the 2020 election. Then the Federal Reserve will possibly file for bankruptcy and be gone, along with their privately owned IRS. Possibly no more income tax. No more credit as a debt based monetary system. This will be replaced with perhaps as a first step, a revalued currency back by gold as a series of steps towards a new Quantum Financial System. Remember, Q has told us that gold will bring down the Fed."
The almost 5 years since show there's really not been any change (for the better anyway). The national debt is up to almost $36 trillion, most Whites still pay income tax, we're not on the gold standard, our fiat currency is more useless than ever before, the Fed has not declared bankruptcy, interest rates are ridiculous, etc.
Edit: Kid pressed submit before I was ready lol
Many of the sources cited were opinion pieces and the page cited within the CARES Act doesn't exist (pg. 549--it only gets into the 300s from all the PDFs and online texts I could find).
From what I could tell after looking at a lot of different sources was it was mostly just government jews giving money to bank jews and vice versa; not a merge.
That also brings up that, if it was true and Trump was in charge at the time, why didn't he do what they said would happen? If he didn't do it then, why would he do it this time? Has potato brain or cackle queen been in charge of it since Trump left in 2021?
(a) NO ONE wanted bump stocks. They are useless. It's a fun toy and gimmick but no real usefulness in combat, self-defense, battle, etc...
(b) By forcing the ATF to take this all the way to the Supreme Court, they showed that the executive branch CANNOT invent new laws like this. It has to go through congress.
Right now, we are talking about the fact that the ATF has NO POWER AT ALL because the laws are too vague, and they have no interpretive power. In other words, unless the law is extremely clear that X is banned or taxed, X cannot be banned or taxed.
- He's stated on multiple occasions that he wants to expand legal immigration, to include automatically giving citizenship to those who go to college.
- He supports genital mutilation for children so long as parents consent. He, in general, supports LGBTQabcdefg123+ degeneracy.
- He instituted the bumpstock ban.
"Take the guns first, go through due process second."
- Platinum plan; worships every race except for the one that "voted" him in.
- Operation warp speed and Trump bucks; 40% of all US dollars were printed in 2020 and 2021 alone.
- Terrible supreme court picks, among virtually every other pick he made. Once is a mistake, twice is odd, three or more times is a pattern.
- Wants to make antisemitism illegal. Has literally said "make Israel great again". Lamented that jews don't have the same influence over our legislative branch that they used to.
Etc.
Edit:
Couple more popped into my head after saving.
- He pardoned ponzi scheme jews and nigger rappers rather than Julian Assange or other far more worthy candidates.
- Told everyone to go home Jan 6th and then proceeded to ignore many of his supporters as they rotted in prison and got railroaded.
This is a trojan horse. Right now they are doing transitions without consent. And note that rarely, rarely do BOTH parents consent to this sort of thing. Making teachers tell parents they are transitioning their kids will be a BIG win.
Besides, many states are declaring transitioning as medical malpractice. All it takes is one word from the FDA and it's all over. (Oh, they already banned those drugs for transitioning? WEIRD!)
I didn't find anything about FDA banning "transitioning" drugs. Are they banned or just not approved? It'd be great if they are.
That means we need to go to the NATURAL mother and the NATURAL father and have them sign a form saying that they permit transition. That's what "consent of the parentS" means.
If the mother remarries, it doesn't matter. Until the new father adopts the kid and the natural father relinquishes his rights to the new adopted father -- he has to sign off on everything.
This is HUGE because it also means women can't transition kids without dad knowing about it!
It'll also depend on how they move forward with it. Parental consent can be interpreted as one or both parents.
But that's also part of my point. If it's so rare to get both parents approval, why not just try to make it outright illegal, with or without the parent(s)? No one, not even the parents, should have the authority to mutilate their child. It's just the slow march further left. Doing half measures and compromises so that people think something is being done when really they're just normalizing what would have been unthinkable a few years before. It's what's gotten us here.
This one escaped a lot of people.
Here's what he did:
"HEY EVERYONE I'M GIVING YOU FREE MONEY"
Then he turned to the FEDERAL RESERVE and said "WRITE CHECKS TO THE PEOPLE IN MY NAME FROM **YOUR** MONEY" and they had to.
It didn't cost the federal government a dime. It showed the world that the executive branch and the president could force the federal reserve to spend their own reserves!
No new debt from it. No congressional approval. Free money, payable by the FED! And no, they could not print it. They had to take it out of their own bank account.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stimulus checks (aka Trump bucks) were part of the CARES Act that Congress approved. It didn't cost the federal government a dime because the federal government doesn't produce anything or actually make any money, only takes from the people and racks up debt, as I'm sure we're both painfully familiar with. You're correct in that CARES didn't result in physical money printed or an increase in the overall money supply, but it did create "digital money" that was disbursed by the Treasury/IRS and was essentially borrowing against future funds (taxes), bonds/securities, etc. and greatly increased the national deficit.
Here's what chat GPT gives me when asking for a synopsis (I don't 100% trust what it says, for obvious reasons). If you have a good/better place to read more on this, I'll be happy to check it out.
"The CARES Act (Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) stimulus checks were funded through government borrowing. Specifically, the U.S. government issued new debt to finance the $2.2 trillion package, which included direct stimulus payments, unemployment benefits, small business loans, and other relief measures.
Here’s a breakdown of how the stimulus checks were funded and the broader financial mechanics:
1. Borrowing from the Financial Markets:
The primary way the U.S. government funded the CARES Act — including the stimulus checks — was through borrowing. The federal government does not have the funds sitting in a savings account for emergencies like these. Instead, it borrows money by issuing Treasury bonds, notes, and bills.
When the government borrows money, it sells these securities to investors, both domestic and foreign. Investors lend the government money in exchange for a promise to pay it back with interest at a later date.
The interest rate on these government securities is relatively low because the U.S. is seen as a low-risk borrower. So, during times of economic crisis, the government can borrow at a favorable rate.
2. Increased Government Debt:
The CARES Act, with its $2.2 trillion price tag, significantly increased the national debt. To pay for the various stimulus measures — including direct payments to individuals, enhanced unemployment benefits, and small business assistance — the government had to issue a large amount of new debt.
This borrowing added to the federal deficit, which is the difference between what the government spends and what it collects in revenue (taxes, etc.). The debt issued as part of the CARES Act was essentially a temporary increase in the deficit, intended to support the economy during the crisis.
3. Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve’s Role:
The Federal Reserve also played a key role in supporting the funding of the CARES Act. While the Fed didn’t directly fund the stimulus checks, it did help the government finance the massive borrowing by keeping interest rates low and engaging in quantitative easing.
Quantitative easing (QE) involves the Fed purchasing government bonds and other securities on the open market, which increases the money supply and helps keep borrowing costs low for the U.S. government.
The Fed also created new money in the form of digital reserves to support the financial system during the crisis, but this was separate from the direct funding of stimulus checks. It helped ensure that borrowing remained affordable and that liquidity was available for financial markets and institutions.
4. The Role of Tax Revenue (Long-Term):
In the short term, the government does not immediately have to raise taxes to cover the cost of the stimulus checks. However, in the long term, the U.S. government will need to either reduce spending or increase tax revenue to service the higher debt load that resulted from borrowing to fund the CARES Act and other pandemic-related measures.
While the immediate relief was funded through borrowing, the long-term financing of that debt (interest payments, principal repayment, etc.) will be borne by future taxpayers.
Key Points:
Borrowing from financial markets was the primary way the government funded the stimulus checks and other parts of the CARES Act.
The federal deficit and national debt increased as a result of the stimulus, with the government issuing Treasury securities to finance the relief package.
The Federal Reserve facilitated this process by keeping interest rates low and engaging in monetary policy measures like quantitative easing.
In Summary:
The stimulus checks were not paid for out of existing government savings or funds but were instead financed through new borrowing by the U.S. government. The government issued debt, which was bought by investors, and used those funds to finance the economic relief programs, including direct payments to individuals. While this helped provide immediate relief during the pandemic, it also increased the federal debt, which will need to be managed in the years to come."
Here's a good start to go down the rabbit hole: https://eraoflight.com/2020/04/15/trump-ends-the-fed-as-we-know-it/
You can't nationalize the Fed because it's entire creation and existence is meant to shield jew bankers from being beholden to the people and to turn the goyim into free range tax slaves through usury. They won't just give that up because their shabbos goy puppet told them to. Unless the Rothschilds and jews worldwide have been imprisoned (or better) and their assets seized, the Fed is not under control by anyone other than jews.
Literally not a single thing they mentioned here happened and that was back in 2020:
"We just restructured the Federal Reserve System. Basically the Federal Reserve will buy out the U.S. debt to the tune of over 2 trillion per month; making the U.S. debt-free by around the 2020 election. Then the Federal Reserve will possibly file for bankruptcy and be gone, along with their privately owned IRS. Possibly no more income tax. No more credit as a debt based monetary system. This will be replaced with perhaps as a first step, a revalued currency back by gold as a series of steps towards a new Quantum Financial System. Remember, Q has told us that gold will bring down the Fed."
The almost 5 years since show there's really not been any change (for the better anyway). The national debt is up to almost $36 trillion, most Whites still pay income tax, we're not on the gold standard, our fiat currency is more useless than ever before, the Fed has not declared bankruptcy, interest rates are ridiculous, etc.
Edit: Kid pressed submit before I was ready lol
Many of the sources cited were opinion pieces and the page cited within the CARES Act doesn't exist (pg. 549--it only gets into the 300s from all the PDFs and online texts I could find).
From what I could tell after looking at a lot of different sources was it was mostly just government jews giving money to bank jews and vice versa; not a merge.
That also brings up that, if it was true and Trump was in charge at the time, why didn't he do what they said would happen? If he didn't do it then, why would he do it this time? Has potato brain or cackle queen been in charge of it since Trump left in 2021?
This is another trojan horse.
(a) NO ONE wanted bump stocks. They are useless. It's a fun toy and gimmick but no real usefulness in combat, self-defense, battle, etc...
(b) By forcing the ATF to take this all the way to the Supreme Court, they showed that the executive branch CANNOT invent new laws like this. It has to go through congress.
Right now, we are talking about the fact that the ATF has NO POWER AT ALL because the laws are too vague, and they have no interpretive power. In other words, unless the law is extremely clear that X is banned or taxed, X cannot be banned or taxed.
In short, he almost overturned the NFA.
You and I both know what happens right after these laws are passed and enforced. HINT: What are we up to, 110?
If the jews were smart they wouldn't allow anyone to write such laws.
They aren't smart.