Consume Product

Nothing was done to reform the electoral process after 2020, and no one was punished in any way, shape, or form for election fraud. So *why not* just do the exact same thing again, if it worked the first time? From that perspective, I get why someone would expect Kamala to be selected.

Personally, I was about 80% positive Trump would be selected going into election night. I did become a little uncertain when I checked at midnight and saw the exact same states that they stole last time were still up in the air, but then by the time I got back home he was declared the winner. But yeah, I suspected it'd be Trump based on the media suddenly "turning" on Biden, leading him to drop out right before the convention. They had spent years covering for his obvious dementia, so there was no reason to not continue doing so, except to set up a Trump victory by "fumbling the ball", so to speak. Then there was Trump suddenly being rehabilitated on social media, having been unbanned on both Faceberg and Twitter. Plus, the assassination attempts bolstering Trump's image. The first one may have actually been genuine, but Routh reeked of a MKUltra'd patsy intentionally set up to fail in order to capitalize on the previous attack and drum up further sympathy. Finally, it's like others have said: giving conservatives a "win" keeps them trapped within the fake voting dialectic. **This is the most salient point.**

*All of this aside*, however, u/TallestSkil has [always posited](https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/199OYYFN7w/who-do-the-elites-want-to-win/c/4ZFCc9OsJJQ) that it doesn't matter who the President is. Both candidates are beholden to jews and will do their bidding, thus identical policies on the actual issues will be passed regardless of who sits in the Oval Office. The fact he incorrectly guessed that Jew Puppet A would be picked instead of Jew Puppet B doesn't negate this. Nor does it do anything to discredit or disprove his main thesis.