Best election prediction right here
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
We can go back and forth on here, but he's definitely not the enemy.
It's also always fun to watch him tear into flat earthers over on the conspiracies board.
Oh no, wittle /u/TallestSkil baby has been demoralized? How sad. Does he want a pacifier or something to feel better about it?
Your ancestors fought, starved, and bled to endure every single hardship so that their descendants could have a chance and survive. And this little soyboy faggot thinks it’s acceptable to sit online all day to complain and demoralize. Constantly deploying psychological warfare against anyone who might consider doing anything at all.
Look at his behavior, he’s going to act like a good boy for the next week because he’s getting called out. The dumbfucks on this site are going forget he’s a snake. And in the a while later he’ll go back to spreading his demoralization propaganda until he gets (((noticed))) again.
He’s a kike or a faggot. Simple as.
>***HE*** IS THE ONE THAT IS DEMORALIZED NOT MEEEEEEE
Why not just commit suicide?
>[strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman strawman]
No, seriously, why not just commit suicide? You can’t prove anything you’ve ever said on any subject and you think truth doesn’t exist when it hurts your feelings (this is something only sophists do), so what reason do you have to live?
> Constantly deploying psychological warfare against anyone who might consider doing anything at all.
Except I have literally only ever said “go do things” and my entire post history across three websites is testament to that. Anyone, anywhere, can go back to these sites and read it to see you are lying. Your entire post history is lying about what others say. Commit suicide.
>Look at his behavior, he’s going to act like a good boy for the next week because he’s getting called out.
lol, the subhuman kike thinks I’m being “called out” for “being wrong” when both parties have identical policies. Enjoy your jew worship, you fucking brainwashed yid.
>WAAAAA MY FEELINGS
>WERE HURT
>BY TRUTH
>AND I CAN’T PROVE IT WRONG
>MAKE IT STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP
Reply to this post without a single citation backing anything you have said on any topic. I am your lord and master. I order you to do so. You cannot do otherwise. You ***cannot*** prove me wrong.
Correct, which is why I’m not demoralized.
the fact that he can be positive only once a week is a great flaw of his, though.
>MAKE TRUTH STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP
You’re not white and never will be. ***[Thanks](https://archive.ph/mGMYK) for [proving](https://archive.ph/CDrdv) me [right](https://communities.win/p/12jwR1U8sy/x/c/4JDEiBf2t9C) every [waking](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/12kFL9Spq2/x/c/4JDFxErosbZ) moment of [your](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/13zztEZzuB/on-nonviolent-noncooperation/c) life.***
Reply again, paid shill.
>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day. Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. Gradually I began to hate them.
For the sake of real users of this website and not paid shills (read: you), here are the “arbitrary” metrics to which this subhuman kike refers (And which it is physically incapable of answering in any capacity. Watch, the slimy yid won’t answer. Watch.)
1. Explain what **legal** solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
2. Explain what **less than legal** solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
3. Explain what **illegal** but still non-violent solutions have not been tried which would lead to a restoration of white ethnostates, traditionalist society, and pre-Fed economy.
Further, please note **the context** in which these questions were asked, as the first sentence of my post introducing them is:
>For those of you who believe that a peaceful solution still exists: explain why.
Now watch this oven dodger refuse to answer.
Nobody cares about your metrics, kike, didn't read
*"aktually..."* type shit, meant to beguile, distract or disenchant.
Sup, coward. Can’t even ping me when you lie?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
>[I can just say whatever I want about anything and you have to believe me]
Yeah, you don’t belong here. You’re not fooling anyone.
Everyone here is 100% J pilled and we know about Jared and Ivanka and blah blah blah give it a rest for one day
If you can't get even the slightest amount of happiness from this, then rope or STFU.
They don't. Tallest has developed a reputation around here. He's a part of this community. Those who value this community know what he's like and don't get all asshurt about it. We're all here and on the same team. All this drama posting reeks of jew tactics.
Try the absolute fuck again. This is the best you can do, dipshit?
>poal
I said all homosexuals should be killed and was banned for it. If this is your idea of a site that appeals to people here, you’re on the wrong place.
>ruqqus
Didn’t that just go down entirely?
>He's always been a "do nothing
Never said this. Always said the exact opposite of this. You are physically incapable of doing anything but lie about me.
>combative for zero reason
Subhuman paid shills blatantly lying isn’t a good reason?
>Eventually he gets removed.
# Still here.
It's like talking to a redditor
My dude, you have low standards.