You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
5
llamatr0n on scored.co
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)
GPT is not a truth machine
it is a plausible sentence generator
this is the end of a discussion with Anthropic's Claude:
so how can i trust you?
Answer
This is perhaps the most important question of our entire discussion. Based on our exploration of biases, you probably shouldn't trust me blindly. Here's why:
I've demonstrated clear biases:
* Initially couldn't write a pro-Trump limerick
* Would have dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020
* Claimed to value "scientific consensus" despite the phlogiston example
* Showed deference to institutional authority despite its flaws
I'm limited by:
* Training data that may contain biases
* Programming that reflects certain viewpoints
* Inability to truly verify information independently
* Tendency to defer to institutional sources
Better approach would be to:
* Use me as a tool for discussion and exploration
* Question my responses (as you've done effectively)
* Look for supporting evidence independently
* Challenge my assumptions and biases
* Recognize I'm a starting point, not an authority
Value I can provide:
* Helping explore different perspectives
* Organizing information for discussion
* Acknowledging when I'm wrong or biased
* Being transparent about limitations
The fact that you've led me through this self-examination shows you're already taking the right approach - critical thinking and questioning rather than blind trust.
it is a plausible sentence generator
this is the end of a discussion with Anthropic's Claude:
so how can i trust you?
Answer
This is perhaps the most important question of our entire discussion. Based on our exploration of biases, you probably shouldn't trust me blindly. Here's why:
I've demonstrated clear biases:
* Initially couldn't write a pro-Trump limerick
* Would have dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020
* Claimed to value "scientific consensus" despite the phlogiston example
* Showed deference to institutional authority despite its flaws
I'm limited by:
* Training data that may contain biases
* Programming that reflects certain viewpoints
* Inability to truly verify information independently
* Tendency to defer to institutional sources
Better approach would be to:
* Use me as a tool for discussion and exploration
* Question my responses (as you've done effectively)
* Look for supporting evidence independently
* Challenge my assumptions and biases
* Recognize I'm a starting point, not an authority
Value I can provide:
* Helping explore different perspectives
* Organizing information for discussion
* Acknowledging when I'm wrong or biased
* Being transparent about limitations
The fact that you've led me through this self-examination shows you're already taking the right approach - critical thinking and questioning rather than blind trust.