1 year ago7 points(+0/-0/+7Score on mirror)1 child
The whole issue is that voting is so fake and gay is that a voting strike wont do anything, it will *still* be a 49/51 split in one direction or the other, and they will just claim that low voter turnout was caused by lackluster candidates and continue as though nothing happened. The Hegelian Dialectic *will* continue unless the system itself is de-legitimized and people *ignore* its mandates. Not voting changes as much as voting and expecting it to change something.
The only way not voting or voting will make a difference is if either one is in the service of de-legitimizing the system itself. Voting for Trump in 2016 and 2020 didn't accomplish much of anything on a policy side, but those votes for Trump were essentially votes against the system, and forced the system to work overtime to "correct" the vote (and they failed miserably in 2016, hence the massive wave in TDS).
The system doesn't hate the Trump because it disagrees with his policies, because his policies are just the system's policies from a decade ago, the system hates Trump because he *de-legitimized* it by winning when he wasn't supposed to, and then getting enough votes so that when they did successfully rig him out of office, it looked fake. The question going into 2024 is whether or not he has compromised enough with the system in order to gain its favor (in which case voting for a meme candidate would be more efficient than not voting, the more people who write in harambe, the stupider democracy is revealed to be).
Only because Trump has mundane politics doesn't mean he is the jew's desired candidate. He is an outlier and tries to pathetically appease the jew as their obedient shabbos goy all the time.
"Please pet me master" he begs as he is frowned upon by the jew. They tolerate him, he isn't an actual threat to them and he is willing to suck their dicks without questions, but he delays their anti-goyim plans by ~1-3 years. And they have to play along with him "diplomatically" because he is not their pet on a leash, even if he yearns for it so much.
What else could you call the jews behavior in response to their pet goy winning the election they had so carefully rigged in favor of "muh first woman president". It doesnt matter to them that he's otherwise loyal, he was able to break their toy, and I dont think theyll forgive him for that no matter how hard he cucks for them.
He certainly is, but I dont think its knowingly. And just because he's controlled, doesnt mean he wont accidentally do something they definately dont want him doing. He *was not supposed to win* in 2016.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
Regardless of what you think about the legitimacy of our (s)elections, the big problem with the way we focus so much on the presidential candidates is after we get /ourguy/ in, people completely drop the ball with getting good conservatives in congress and (more importantly) doing something IRL.
Yeah, the real issue is establishing ground level candidates. It ultimately doesn't matter how much of a commie the present president is if states and cities simply ignore him. We need pro-white mayors and governors.
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Honestly, sending a message that you're not gonna support their continued bullshit is irrelevant when they don't need your vote anyways. Voting hasn't mattered for decades.
Republicans actually do need your vote. Whites are the only reason republicans win. Ever. They continue ti shift Overton to the left with their gay/brown/kike agenda, but none of those groups vote republican. If whites abstain from the vote, republicans lose in a landslide.
Republicans dont fight for the white vote because they know you’ll vote for them anyways.
So is this guy for accelerationism? He seems to be saying everything shifts more left and left every cycle. And yes he's correct on that.
However, one of his arguments was "if you vote then you're saying that you support the entire party platform"
I have to disagree with that. I think it's rare that most or even a majority of a candidate's voters agree with everything on a said candidate's platform. Most voters are 1 or 2 issue voters. Nobody agrees with 100% of the party platform, to suggest so is a poor basis for the argument on "sending a message".
When one guy says he's going to "deport deport deport" and the other gal says "let them stay", you at least have to vote for the guy that says deport deport deport. At worst he lied, at mid he tries and fails, and best he succeeds. With her at best... well there is no best, you guaranteed get more dirty immigrants ruining the country your ancestors built.
The only way not voting or voting will make a difference is if either one is in the service of de-legitimizing the system itself. Voting for Trump in 2016 and 2020 didn't accomplish much of anything on a policy side, but those votes for Trump were essentially votes against the system, and forced the system to work overtime to "correct" the vote (and they failed miserably in 2016, hence the massive wave in TDS).
The system doesn't hate the Trump because it disagrees with his policies, because his policies are just the system's policies from a decade ago, the system hates Trump because he *de-legitimized* it by winning when he wasn't supposed to, and then getting enough votes so that when they did successfully rig him out of office, it looked fake. The question going into 2024 is whether or not he has compromised enough with the system in order to gain its favor (in which case voting for a meme candidate would be more efficient than not voting, the more people who write in harambe, the stupider democracy is revealed to be).
"Please pet me master" he begs as he is frowned upon by the jew. They tolerate him, he isn't an actual threat to them and he is willing to suck their dicks without questions, but he delays their anti-goyim plans by ~1-3 years. And they have to play along with him "diplomatically" because he is not their pet on a leash, even if he yearns for it so much.