You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
I'm more inclined to believe they were real and alive more recently than commonly accepted, and probably died out during the flood.
Also, they dont have the "real bones", a fossil is literally a rock that slowly replaced the actual biological material. Thats why we havent cloned dinosaurs, theres no genetic material. I do have serious questions about the age of the earth and especially about evolution (which has holes in it even from a semantic perspective, as the definition of what constitutes a species is often nebulous and generally the best definition is " a group of animals that can produce viable offspring with one another).
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Well, while two organisms that CAN'T interbreed and create viable offspring are definitely NOT the same species, it's necessarily more ambiguous within those that can interbreed. The wholphin (whale-dolphin) can have offspring, but whales and dolphins are different species.
There's a species of gecko in the california mountains that they attempted to categorize. What they found was 17 "tribes" in a horseshoe shape around the peak. Each tribe could interbreed up to two tribes over, but no further. Is that one species? Several? How many?
Evolutionary theory predicts such observations for organisms in the process of distinct species formation. But it doesn't lend itself to neat categorization.
There ought to be a popular measure of genetic similarity for breeds of a "single species". It would be revealing to apply it to humanity.
>There ought to be a popular measure of genetic similarity for breeds of a "single species". It would be revealing to apply it to humanity.
Which is exactly why the jews will never willingly allow evolution to be held up to legitimate scrutiny, because a serious investigation into it might either disprove it, or prove racism is correct. Either way, they lose if people stop believing they are monkeys.
Also, they dont have the "real bones", a fossil is literally a rock that slowly replaced the actual biological material. Thats why we havent cloned dinosaurs, theres no genetic material. I do have serious questions about the age of the earth and especially about evolution (which has holes in it even from a semantic perspective, as the definition of what constitutes a species is often nebulous and generally the best definition is " a group of animals that can produce viable offspring with one another).
There's a species of gecko in the california mountains that they attempted to categorize. What they found was 17 "tribes" in a horseshoe shape around the peak. Each tribe could interbreed up to two tribes over, but no further. Is that one species? Several? How many?
Evolutionary theory predicts such observations for organisms in the process of distinct species formation. But it doesn't lend itself to neat categorization.
There ought to be a popular measure of genetic similarity for breeds of a "single species". It would be revealing to apply it to humanity.
Which is exactly why the jews will never willingly allow evolution to be held up to legitimate scrutiny, because a serious investigation into it might either disprove it, or prove racism is correct. Either way, they lose if people stop believing they are monkeys.