You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
4
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)
Whether intentional or not, it's interesting you chose the word demographics as the first word of this post's title. In addition to what others have said, it's important to remember that the Stock Market Crash of 1929 & the resulting (((Great Depression))) was a controlled demolition of the economy.
Much like slightly over a century before when kikes gained total control over the Bank of England due to Nathan Rothschild having a rider dispatch false reports from the Battle of Waterloo that Napoleon was victorious, and marching on London. This then caused massive panic selling on the British Stock Market (the intended effect of the aforementioned cause) with prices crashing. Rothschild bought up pretty much the entire market for probably a 10th of a penny/pence on the dollar/pound, then when news that Wellington was victorious & Napoleon was defeated (for the last time), the resulting windfall on the market made the Rothschilds exponentially more wealthy to the tune of a fortune that is immeasurable (in the trillions) and also not ever included in their horse shit "richest faggot pawn list" in Forbes.
>“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls the British money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.” -"""Baron""" Nathan Meyer Rothschild
And while after the advent of things like the telegraph this specific type of scam wouldn't be possible again, having control of the Bank of England made the kikes the nominal financial rulers of this world. To this day the (((City of London))) (not the machete-niggerfied metropolis/capital of England, but the "City of London") is the financial capital of the world. So there wasn't as overt of a smoking gun with the Great Depression as with Rothschild's coup, but that's only because it was far easier to get away with after the Federal Reserve was created, and inflation (((bubbles))) could be increased and burst at will. Markets can be demoed at will.
Also keep in mind that Herbert Hoover was elected president in November of 1928, so with the crash of 1929 his entire presidency was dominated and defined by the (((Great Depression))). In comes the ultimate willing kike puppet, that slovenly crippled bitch FDR. FDR defeats Hoover in an absurly lopsided election in 1932, carrying 42 states compared to 6, and 472 electoral votes to 59. Then FDR is made a (((hero))) for "ending" the depression, and we know where things went from there.
Depressions, bubbles, etc are always a way to further consolidate wealth & assets into the hands of kikes, crumbs from the table for their shabbos goy slaves, and ever less legitimate monopoly money (that can disappear at any time) for everyone else. This repeats with every similar event, the belt gets looser around the enormous well fed gut of the kikes at the top, while the noose gets tighter around all of our necks.
I'd rather endure neither a (((Great Replacement))) nor a (((Great Depression)). However, I am willing to give my life in The Great Crusade- that will punish and permanently do away with those responsible for both.
Much like slightly over a century before when kikes gained total control over the Bank of England due to Nathan Rothschild having a rider dispatch false reports from the Battle of Waterloo that Napoleon was victorious, and marching on London. This then caused massive panic selling on the British Stock Market (the intended effect of the aforementioned cause) with prices crashing. Rothschild bought up pretty much the entire market for probably a 10th of a penny/pence on the dollar/pound, then when news that Wellington was victorious & Napoleon was defeated (for the last time), the resulting windfall on the market made the Rothschilds exponentially more wealthy to the tune of a fortune that is immeasurable (in the trillions) and also not ever included in their horse shit "richest faggot pawn list" in Forbes.
>“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls the British money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.” -"""Baron""" Nathan Meyer Rothschild
And while after the advent of things like the telegraph this specific type of scam wouldn't be possible again, having control of the Bank of England made the kikes the nominal financial rulers of this world. To this day the (((City of London))) (not the machete-niggerfied metropolis/capital of England, but the "City of London") is the financial capital of the world. So there wasn't as overt of a smoking gun with the Great Depression as with Rothschild's coup, but that's only because it was far easier to get away with after the Federal Reserve was created, and inflation (((bubbles))) could be increased and burst at will. Markets can be demoed at will.
Also keep in mind that Herbert Hoover was elected president in November of 1928, so with the crash of 1929 his entire presidency was dominated and defined by the (((Great Depression))). In comes the ultimate willing kike puppet, that slovenly crippled bitch FDR. FDR defeats Hoover in an absurly lopsided election in 1932, carrying 42 states compared to 6, and 472 electoral votes to 59. Then FDR is made a (((hero))) for "ending" the depression, and we know where things went from there.
Depressions, bubbles, etc are always a way to further consolidate wealth & assets into the hands of kikes, crumbs from the table for their shabbos goy slaves, and ever less legitimate monopoly money (that can disappear at any time) for everyone else. This repeats with every similar event, the belt gets looser around the enormous well fed gut of the kikes at the top, while the noose gets tighter around all of our necks.
I'd rather endure neither a (((Great Replacement))) nor a (((Great Depression)). However, I am willing to give my life in The Great Crusade- that will punish and permanently do away with those responsible for both.