Consume Product

I was a bail bondsman for twelve years. Can confirm

It takes a whole society to manage and confine women. I’m talking about mothers and fathers. I’m talking about their peers slut shaming. I’m talking about young men needing to put a ring on it if they want to put a dick in it. That’s how it used to be done.

exogenesis (artificial wombs) will be the worst thing to happen to women and the gynocracy in the history of humanity. a shitload of countries have already banned it, and increasingly more countries are banning surrogacy. if women stop being gatekeepers of procreation, every single man who wants a kid will have one without needing anyone else. it's a massive power blow.

Close but women can never be given the responsibility of picking suitable men. When you give that responsibility to women not only do they provably fuck it up, you're also giving all the power to dictate what a quality man is to women. Men's value becomes entirely linked to what women want and in this way men become nothing more than extensions of women's desire. Men should be the ones to determine what a quality man is not women.

In modernity the best way to ensure it's the men who determine who the quality men are is to reduce taxes next to 0, reduce government regulations considerably while removing all welfare and social programs and abolishing the civil rights act. Then abolish child support and alimony while making division of assets equal to what you bring in you get out rather than 50/50. This way the better quality men will be given more resources and that will allow the men more power to only accept suitable women rather than demeaning oneself such that women have all the power in picking the men.

Women pick simp/soy boys for fathers or degenerate no life losers that never show up. The more power we give to women to pick the men they want the worse quality men the fathers always turn out to be. Women cannot be given this task and we cannot expect them to ever rise up to the responsibility.

Edit - Just to give an example of why what I described matters. I know a single mother with 3 kids. She's decent looking but not anything special. Her ex-bf who she had the kids with is a good looking guy but he's also a meth addict. She of course picked him for the looks alone and he was "low quality". Well, she has been living entirely on government funding with 3 kids and he's not paying any child support. She has never had a job in her life. Why can a single mother with 3 kids not receiving help from any man live on welfare with 3 kids no problem? What incentive is there then for women to pick quality men when the government taxes quality men and gives the proceeds of these taxes to single mothers? Women can pick good looking meth addicts to fuck and there's no consequences for them. Even when she was living with him she still received money from the government which she depended on to live because he couldn't hold a job down being a meth addict and all. The incentive structure is such that there's 0 incentive for women to pick quality men. Women are picking the biggest losers around that have physical features they like and getting knocked up by these men with 0 care because daddy government comes to their rescue every time. Women need to face consequences of picking bad men so women stop having this freedom to pick these low quality men. The only way to do this is take away the social safety nets. Abolish all welfare, all child support, all alimony and force women to have to pick quality men to survive.

I’m going to stop you right there. Historically women have not been the gate keeper of genetic lineage. First it was survival of the fittest. Man saw something he wanted and took it. Then it evolved into arranged marriages. Then in the Victorian era is when the concept of romance came into being and marrying for love.

Even so early as the ‘50’s fathers were still screening potential suitors.

It wasn’t until men were removed from it that the problems arose we see today.

Obviously this isn’t universal as peasants did whatever, but most of the lasting empires and religions patrolled the hell out of their women.

Keep in mind that most of our perspectives of those eras are the romance novelists and writers would likely be called soy beta cucks in the modern era if they were alive.

The chads were out and about and the wimps were in their bedrooms writing.

Gross. One more reason to hate trannies.

Those are widowed mothers.

Widows are not single mothers... unless they drove their husbands to suicide

then they are worse.

Of course not. That’s a widow. Why even bring up an extreme exception to the rule like that though? We’re not low IQ animals over here other than our local street shitter. 😁

You're retarded. One of the rare females who are not degenerates and here you are being disrespectful. Of course everything could be a LARP

Why is it retarded? It's accurate, and higher effort than a lot of posts we get here.

you sound like a race mixer

I’m pretty sure the single mother stats are mostly just niggers being niggers. People that look at statistics are obligated to leave the race factor out.

Family is too White