You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
12
fourleaved on scored.co
1 year ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)3 children
Intellectual property doesn't make sense. You don't own an idea, and having an idea means nothing if it isn't applied. IP and copyright hawks are on the same level of productivity as financial speculators
The age of copyright is rapidly coming to a close. It was never a moral necessity.
Originally, the copyright was a way for authors to get paid for their work. See, anyone could take a book and typeset and publish it, and sell copies for the price of ink and paper. Even the labor was negligible once you got it typeset. 100 copies, 10,000 copies, didn't matter, was just a matter of time.
So if an author wanted to get compensated, they had to ask the government to stop other printing presses from publishing the work. The one publishing house would charge a little extra and forward the extra to the author, and everyone was happy.
This was a modern concept. Up until then, authors, artists, etc, NEVER got paid for copying their work. If you wanted to feed your family while producing works of art, you either had to be rich yourself or have a rich guy become your patron. THIS system made way more sense because it created a sort of "tenure" where the artist was truly free to express their art and have full control over that expression, versus copyright where the author had to think about how many copies he was going to sell and target the audience or whatever.
We should definitely abolish copyright law. If you want someone to create something, pay them upfront. If you want them to be free to "express themselves" then buy them food and lodging and clothing. That's all that's required to have a functioning society where the people own what is popular, and artists are free to express themselves to the maximum extent possible.
As for trademarks, patents, etc... there is a case to be made for trademarks within reason, but patents are also nonsense. The idea was that by incentivizing people to share their ideas, we would get a lot more sharing of ideas. Today, the system is completely inverted. If I work for a major corporation, the policy is always "DO NOT EVER LOOK AT PATENTS". Only lawyers look at those, and the only time they ever talk about them with inventors is when it is time to create a patent to milk an invention for all it's worth.
With patents, just have people share stuff as they want to. If they want to keep it a secret, that's fine, but society should respond by not sharing with such people, or shaming them. My idea is that we create an intellectual university where people who are "in" can freely access the information on the condition they freely share their own ideas, but those who are "out" get NOTHING. I don't know a way to force someone to share their ideas, so there is no effective means of enforcement except the honor system.
1 year ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)4 children
If you don’t own or patent a certain idea or mechanism, what is there to stop a pajeet of jumping in at the final stage of R&D to steal your designs and manufacture it for a 1/10th of the cost?
the solution would be to somehow mimic the patronage of old, and have people fund the development of something rather than access to it when it's done. of course, that's easier said than done, just look at all the failed Kickstarter projects out there.
We can still have patents, on blockchain easily available to the public. This way everyone will know that you invented the product and makes the best version of it while the pajeet copy is just a scam.
This problem exist the other way around too, i.e you invent something new, but because a jew who bought millions of patents has a few that prevent you from creating and selling your product, even tho it's different.
You'll get sued and have to waste time and money in court, which you could have used to improve your product. Same goes for when a pajeet steal your ideas, you have to sue them. It's all a big jewish scheme to enrich (((lawyers))) while innovation and high quality products are harmed.
The only solution is to ban jews, pajeets and other non-Whites from White countries. Then ban their cheap copies created using slave labor from being sold in White countries.
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
We Americans should be the one stealing people's ideas and manufacturing them at 1/10th the cost.
Why do we think a bunch of 85 IQ third worlders can out-produce us in any arena?
It's because our government has hamstrung us and forced us to hire pajeets to do anything.
Get rid of tariffs on OUR GOODs, or tariff the crap out of everyone else's. There is no other way. If China wants to put a tariff on our stuff, then we put the same or higher tariff on theirs. If they refuse to trade with us, then we refuse to trade with them. Simple. The best part is, the amount of money we'll make with tariffs far exceeds the amount we could ever make taxing ourselves into poverty. Get rid of taxes, tariff the crap out of foreign goods, and let's rebuild America.
Furthermore -- the regulations in our country are antithetical to the concept of freedom. Government should have NO role in how businesses are to be run. If workers want safety, that's up to them. If industry wants standards, they can do that themselves.
Maybe not stealing them, but he's right that if we got rid of all the red tape the jews in our government have created in the name of "saving the environment" and "protecting free trade" (when in reality this red tape does neither, it just hamstrings whites and enriches jew lawyers), we could produce most things at substantially higher quality for a fraction of the cost.
Its a pretty jewed ideology in practice, thats for sure. In the history of Christian Europe, while credit was generally given to those who made discoveries, the concept of being able to *hoard* your discovery was considered deeply immoral and I dont think every really occured.
Originally, the copyright was a way for authors to get paid for their work. See, anyone could take a book and typeset and publish it, and sell copies for the price of ink and paper. Even the labor was negligible once you got it typeset. 100 copies, 10,000 copies, didn't matter, was just a matter of time.
So if an author wanted to get compensated, they had to ask the government to stop other printing presses from publishing the work. The one publishing house would charge a little extra and forward the extra to the author, and everyone was happy.
This was a modern concept. Up until then, authors, artists, etc, NEVER got paid for copying their work. If you wanted to feed your family while producing works of art, you either had to be rich yourself or have a rich guy become your patron. THIS system made way more sense because it created a sort of "tenure" where the artist was truly free to express their art and have full control over that expression, versus copyright where the author had to think about how many copies he was going to sell and target the audience or whatever.
We should definitely abolish copyright law. If you want someone to create something, pay them upfront. If you want them to be free to "express themselves" then buy them food and lodging and clothing. That's all that's required to have a functioning society where the people own what is popular, and artists are free to express themselves to the maximum extent possible.
As for trademarks, patents, etc... there is a case to be made for trademarks within reason, but patents are also nonsense. The idea was that by incentivizing people to share their ideas, we would get a lot more sharing of ideas. Today, the system is completely inverted. If I work for a major corporation, the policy is always "DO NOT EVER LOOK AT PATENTS". Only lawyers look at those, and the only time they ever talk about them with inventors is when it is time to create a patent to milk an invention for all it's worth.
With patents, just have people share stuff as they want to. If they want to keep it a secret, that's fine, but society should respond by not sharing with such people, or shaming them. My idea is that we create an intellectual university where people who are "in" can freely access the information on the condition they freely share their own ideas, but those who are "out" get NOTHING. I don't know a way to force someone to share their ideas, so there is no effective means of enforcement except the honor system.
This problem exist the other way around too, i.e you invent something new, but because a jew who bought millions of patents has a few that prevent you from creating and selling your product, even tho it's different.
You'll get sued and have to waste time and money in court, which you could have used to improve your product. Same goes for when a pajeet steal your ideas, you have to sue them. It's all a big jewish scheme to enrich (((lawyers))) while innovation and high quality products are harmed.
The only solution is to ban jews, pajeets and other non-Whites from White countries. Then ban their cheap copies created using slave labor from being sold in White countries.
Why do we think a bunch of 85 IQ third worlders can out-produce us in any arena?
It's because our government has hamstrung us and forced us to hire pajeets to do anything.
Get rid of tariffs on OUR GOODs, or tariff the crap out of everyone else's. There is no other way. If China wants to put a tariff on our stuff, then we put the same or higher tariff on theirs. If they refuse to trade with us, then we refuse to trade with them. Simple. The best part is, the amount of money we'll make with tariffs far exceeds the amount we could ever make taxing ourselves into poverty. Get rid of taxes, tariff the crap out of foreign goods, and let's rebuild America.
Furthermore -- the regulations in our country are antithetical to the concept of freedom. Government should have NO role in how businesses are to be run. If workers want safety, that's up to them. If industry wants standards, they can do that themselves.
Considering workers have to take whatever shitty job is offered just to survive it really isnt up to them.
Some high level kikery right there
"My fellow Americans, we should steal!"