Consume Product

Don't get it twisted though. They're more politically active but *very much* lack the capability, physically or mentally, to do anything like the russian revolution. They know it deep down too, which is why they don't. The empowered don't actually *want* them to do this either, because it would destroy the very efficient system they currently have in place, so they're kept around as a false opposition just like conservatives are.

What's the difference between a modern western leftist and a 1917 era russian communist? The average bolshevik red army member was already hardened. He was a worker, a peasant, a soldier, before he ever became a communist. His life was built on a lattice of grueling physical labor and hardship. Hence why he supported the bolsheviks, which promised to end his suffering. He didn't give a solitary fuck about the rights of niggers, or faggot rights, or trannies, or singing kumbaya with all the different peoples of the world. If the bolsheviks (common bolsheviks, not leadership) and modern leftists were even remotely close to being the same people, the red army would have been absolutely fucking folded by the white army 10 times over

What about the average western liberal? Some weak retard with no mental fortitude that has no life experience or hardship to speak of.

I do, however, still respect the leftists more than judeo-conservatives based off of the fact that they're politically active and conscious *at all*. They have potential to actually go somewhere. Your run of the mill conservative typically has little to no chance of doing anything but posturing and argumenting.