You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
11
HerrBBQ on scored.co
1 year ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)2 children
The Romans originally had a fairly concrete understanding of the difference between a "Roman citizen" and a person who was merely subject to Roman rule, which we would today call a "resident" or "national". Citizens were true Romans who had the right to vote and other legal privileges. Non-citizens were not truly Roman. As their empire declined, more and more subjects were granted citizenship and this distinction was lost. Big surprise, the more foreigners were accepted as "Roman", the more unstable the government became and the more quality of life declined for the true Roman people.
Many places still adopt a similar hierarchy, the Emerati of Dubai being similar for example. A good system to retain sovereignty whilst remaining realistic.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
No a national is a member of the people. For instance you were a Yugoslav citizen but a Croatian national. Nation comes from birth. Natio is old Latin for born (of).