You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
10
detransthrowaway on scored.co
1 year ago10 points(+0/-0/+10Score on mirror)4 children
For reference: Net Neutrality is the belief that internet service providers should not be able to favor or restrict certain types of content, such as metering connections or charging more for them. This fucker got rid of that. Trump instated him, might be a good idea to bring up anytime someone says Trump had great policies.
Net Neutrality Legislation was a Trojan Horse for the CIA/Mossad to control the internet under the guise of "neutrality". Good idea on paper, but in practice it would have been the internet version of the PATRIOT act. The *best* thing Trump's regime did was shooting it down into the abyss. Assume anything that the jewnited states of america does in the name of some nebulous "freedom" or "equality" is for the detriment of its own citizens to usher in Antichrist and you will be correct 99% of the time.
Not really. Any time you see a title that sounds good on its face (ie the patriot act), expect it to do the opposite of what your first thoughts are.
There was a lot wrong with net neutrality, but one easy to understand point of how it would have been bad is that it would have outlawed big internet companies from building CDNs (content delivery networks) at no cost to their users. In true commie fashion, "neutrality" means bringing everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
An example of CDN use that we are all familiar with is Netflix. They build out CDNs at major ISPs at no cost, which allows them to deliver high quality video without stuttering to people who have slower connections that normally wouldn't be able to handle that type of streaming. The ISP's would love for everyone to have to upgrade and pay for higher packages in order to stream, but as long as competitors were allowing Netflix to build these CDNs they had to as well in order to compete. If there was a law against it, then they remove the pesky problem of competitors in the free market and can charge their customer base more. It's not just Netflix either, CDNs make our experience online better in just about every way.
That regulation prevented latency-sensitive stuff from being prioritized above other stuff.
It was blocking lag-free gaming and high quality VOIP. It was preventing companies from using a proper QOS protocol to make sure everyone was served.
No, I don't think your tranny porn should lag my game or call. Fuck you!!!
There was a lot wrong with net neutrality, but one easy to understand point of how it would have been bad is that it would have outlawed big internet companies from building CDNs (content delivery networks) at no cost to their users. In true commie fashion, "neutrality" means bringing everyone down to the lowest common denominator.
An example of CDN use that we are all familiar with is Netflix. They build out CDNs at major ISPs at no cost, which allows them to deliver high quality video without stuttering to people who have slower connections that normally wouldn't be able to handle that type of streaming. The ISP's would love for everyone to have to upgrade and pay for higher packages in order to stream, but as long as competitors were allowing Netflix to build these CDNs they had to as well in order to compete. If there was a law against it, then they remove the pesky problem of competitors in the free market and can charge their customer base more. It's not just Netflix either, CDNs make our experience online better in just about every way.