Honest question. Would the acceleration from Harris be a good thing? How would Trump giving the goyim a break effect the future?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
Hyperborean_ on scored.co
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
>But how will their 'illusion' of democracy be shattered if their guy gets elected?
In the sense that "if Trump couldn't deliver real reforms, then who will?". We will see every single federal institution overreach in an effort to thwart Trump's milquetoast agenda. It's hard for someone of reasonable intelligence to watch that dynamic persist for multiple years and then come to the conclusion that the solution to this problem will be found in the 2028 Republican primary.
>What's the one and only thing trump is good at doing? Getting the economy under control. If he gets installed, gas prices will go down, inflation will (maybe) go down, he might cut taxes again, and people's economic lives will otherwise improve.
Yea, that's a good point. Although there is a decent chance that war with Iran breaks out during a second Trump term, which means there will be no relief on gas prices. Also, unless we are operating under the mistaken belief that Trump will deport massive numbers of third world invaders, there will be little relief in terms of the cost of living - at least in most regions of the country. Housing prices will remain high, the job market will still be oversaturated with cheap foreign laborers, and even things like used automobiles will be expensive to acquire due to the increased demand. I'm sure there will be tax breaks, but we all know that establishment Republicans will ensure multinational corporations are prioritized while the rest of the populace is left to fight over the table scraps.
>Quantity has a quality of it's own. We need more people dissatisfied with the status quo and potentially willing to change it more than anything"
Everything that you said in the final paragraph is reasonable and I agree with most of your points. However, I disagree that federal gun seizures would have the destabilizing effect that you seem to believe. There might be a handful of civilians who go down shooting, but on the whole, I think conservatives would meekly comply. On the state level you might have some dissent, but nothing that would destabilize the federal government. Same thing with the criminalization of "hate speech".
I would much rather see our guys remain armed to the teeth and continuing to redpill normies while we progress towards the collapse of the U.S dollar, which is where I believe the real catalyst for change exists and subsequently revolution would begin. It's not going to occur as a result of conservatives pushing back to government overreach, no matter what the regime does or takes from them.
>It's hard for someone of reasonable intelligence to watch that dynamic persist for multiple years and then come to the conclusion that the solution to this problem will be found in the 2028 Republican primary.
The only people 'of reasonable intelligence' who would see this now would be people who were under the age of 18 or so in 2020. That's not a significant portion of the population. Yes its important but does that comparatively minor benefit alone offset all the consequences?
>Although there is a decent chance that war with Iran breaks out during a second Trump term, which means there will be no relief on gas prices.
I personally think the odds are about 60/40 of trump getting installed specifically *because* the kikes want to increase military tensions in the middle east and the only possible way to get young White men to sign up for the military would be under some rah-rah reagan-esque "patriot" like trump.
>there will be little relief in terms of the cost of living
If taxes are cut significantly that would go a *long* way towards relieving the cost of living alone, especially if he cuts them more than the first time. Additionally, if trump were to focus on oil/energy independence like he did the first time, oil prices coming from the middle east wouldn't matter so much.
>There might be a handful of civilians who go down shooting, but on the whole, I think conservatives would meekly comply
Even if 10 percent of gun owners refused to comply that's over *eight million people* in the US. We don't *need* half of all gun owners to take up arms against the feds. A single digit percentage would be enough.
> while we progress towards the collapse of the U.S dollar, which is where I believe the real catalyst for change exists
Of course. You know, the jews are actively working towards this right now. That's the point of all the inflation after all. They know that only in the steepest of calamities will they be able to institute the New World Order that they want to institute; will they get the people to beg for the chains of their own slavery. So they are actively working towards that. It'll also be the best time for /ourguys/ to be able to wrest power from the kikes. A very fine line between total victory and total defeat. But everything plays into this goal. Less inflation and a more comfortable economic life for the average joe does not further this as much (unless they do a covid reboot under trump again).
In the sense that "if Trump couldn't deliver real reforms, then who will?". We will see every single federal institution overreach in an effort to thwart Trump's milquetoast agenda. It's hard for someone of reasonable intelligence to watch that dynamic persist for multiple years and then come to the conclusion that the solution to this problem will be found in the 2028 Republican primary.
>What's the one and only thing trump is good at doing? Getting the economy under control. If he gets installed, gas prices will go down, inflation will (maybe) go down, he might cut taxes again, and people's economic lives will otherwise improve.
Yea, that's a good point. Although there is a decent chance that war with Iran breaks out during a second Trump term, which means there will be no relief on gas prices. Also, unless we are operating under the mistaken belief that Trump will deport massive numbers of third world invaders, there will be little relief in terms of the cost of living - at least in most regions of the country. Housing prices will remain high, the job market will still be oversaturated with cheap foreign laborers, and even things like used automobiles will be expensive to acquire due to the increased demand. I'm sure there will be tax breaks, but we all know that establishment Republicans will ensure multinational corporations are prioritized while the rest of the populace is left to fight over the table scraps.
>Quantity has a quality of it's own. We need more people dissatisfied with the status quo and potentially willing to change it more than anything"
Everything that you said in the final paragraph is reasonable and I agree with most of your points. However, I disagree that federal gun seizures would have the destabilizing effect that you seem to believe. There might be a handful of civilians who go down shooting, but on the whole, I think conservatives would meekly comply. On the state level you might have some dissent, but nothing that would destabilize the federal government. Same thing with the criminalization of "hate speech".
I would much rather see our guys remain armed to the teeth and continuing to redpill normies while we progress towards the collapse of the U.S dollar, which is where I believe the real catalyst for change exists and subsequently revolution would begin. It's not going to occur as a result of conservatives pushing back to government overreach, no matter what the regime does or takes from them.
The only people 'of reasonable intelligence' who would see this now would be people who were under the age of 18 or so in 2020. That's not a significant portion of the population. Yes its important but does that comparatively minor benefit alone offset all the consequences?
>Although there is a decent chance that war with Iran breaks out during a second Trump term, which means there will be no relief on gas prices.
I personally think the odds are about 60/40 of trump getting installed specifically *because* the kikes want to increase military tensions in the middle east and the only possible way to get young White men to sign up for the military would be under some rah-rah reagan-esque "patriot" like trump.
>there will be little relief in terms of the cost of living
If taxes are cut significantly that would go a *long* way towards relieving the cost of living alone, especially if he cuts them more than the first time. Additionally, if trump were to focus on oil/energy independence like he did the first time, oil prices coming from the middle east wouldn't matter so much.
>There might be a handful of civilians who go down shooting, but on the whole, I think conservatives would meekly comply
Even if 10 percent of gun owners refused to comply that's over *eight million people* in the US. We don't *need* half of all gun owners to take up arms against the feds. A single digit percentage would be enough.
> while we progress towards the collapse of the U.S dollar, which is where I believe the real catalyst for change exists
Of course. You know, the jews are actively working towards this right now. That's the point of all the inflation after all. They know that only in the steepest of calamities will they be able to institute the New World Order that they want to institute; will they get the people to beg for the chains of their own slavery. So they are actively working towards that. It'll also be the best time for /ourguys/ to be able to wrest power from the kikes. A very fine line between total victory and total defeat. But everything plays into this goal. Less inflation and a more comfortable economic life for the average joe does not further this as much (unless they do a covid reboot under trump again).