You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
5
TakenusernameA on scored.co
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Pretty sure that the Abrahamic Race was Aryan (the definitely came from beyond Chaldea), the modern pretenders are heavily intermixed with Hamite and Canaanites, which is why theyre so brown.
1 year ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)2 children
[In First, Archaeologists Extract DNA of Ancient Israelites](https://archive.is/oLK5q)
Ancient Israelite DNA is White:
> the Y chromosome in the man belongs to the J2 haplogroup, a group of closely-related DNA sequences that is believed to have originated in the Caucasus or Eastern Anatolia
Modern jews have Canaanite DNA:
> researchers have already mapped the DNA of ancient Canaanites, showing that they had a strong ancestral connection to modern-day Jewish and Arab populations.
Quick, interpret this as talmudically as possible!
> If researchers gather more data confirming that most Israelites indeed shared this ancestry with the Canaanites, it would support something that experts have strongly suspected for a while, that in fact the ancient Hebrews descended from the Canaanites.
1. Everyone knows jews are the ancient Israelites (because jews say so).
2. Uh-oh, turns out modern jews actually have Canaanite DNA, not the distinct DNA of Abraham's origins in Ur.
3. Um, uh... the ancient Israelites must have merely split off from the Canaanites - Abraham, the Exodus, etc. never happened!
1 year ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
>something that experts have strongly suspected for a while, that in fact the ancient Hebrews descended from the Canaanites.
This right here is why I dont trust the Soyence of the past century. "Some people pretending to jews have been proven to actually be genetically related the enemies of the real Hebrews, and instead of entertaining the possibility that they might be frauds, we will instead claim that the ancient Hebrews were actually their enemies, despite the fact that all historical sources from antiquity pointing to the Hebrews *not* being native to the Levant."
The jews are "jews", but only in the geographical sense - Judaeans from the Roman province of Judaea, not the genetic tribe of Judah. We know from history that Edomites and other accursed races were absorbed into Judaea about a century before the time of Christ (through forced "conversion" etc.) - this lines up with their descendants having Canaanite DNA.
It's a mistake to read "jew" in your Bible and think this automatically means "Israelite", just like "American" doesn't mean "White".
Archaeology and history are not hard science; it's subject to politics and muh racisms just like everything else, and this determines what interpretations are publicly acceptable, even if that means picking the least plausible explanation (as with this We Wuz Izraelitez example).
Conveniently, many non-White cultures have taboos about disturbing the dead, so it can be offensive to use modern tech to definitively prove that these ancient remains really are are the ancestors of whoever happens to live there more recently.
This is doubly true when artifacts from thousands of years ago are suspiciously superior by far to anything made by their "descendants" many centuries later.
>the Y chromosome in the man belongs to the J2 haplogroup, a group of closely-related DNA sequences that is believed to have originated in the Caucasus or Eastern Anatolia
More evidence for the theory that the lost tribes carried off by the Assyrians went North.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Many pastors now teach that there is no need to look for "lost tribes" - the jews encompass the entire surviving remnant of all twelve tribes due to small numbers from the northern tribes moving south into Judah over time.
Yes, they essentially believe the northern ten tribes were taken away and then totally poofed out of existence as identifiable peoples without leaving any traces (just like the ashes from the holobunga).
I wonder what pilpul they'd spin if you countered with the fact that Abraham was promised many nations and not just one or two? Or why White pagans were so quick to convert, while brown pagans only ever converted in small numbers? Almost as if our ancestors were the lost sheep Christ spoke of.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Oh ho, do you not know that the innumerable descendants promised to Abraham were not literal blood descendants but ["spiritual seed"](https://www.gotquestions.org/seed-of-Abraham.html)? God promised Abraham's seed would become many nations - but pastors instead preach that many nations became Abraham's seed.
They also seem to selectively forget that the promise was passed very explicitly to Isaac and then Jacob, with Ishmael and Esau being rejected. If descent from Abraham alone was sufficient, the arabs and Edomites would also be God's Chosen People™ alongside the jews.
It is hard to argue against this because everything is reframed as "spiritual". When one of the New Testament writers accidentally does a racism, this is overlooked or downplayed as only being for that time or not a full understanding or whatever - see Paul writing about his empathy for his literal blood kinsmen instead of caring about all of the Judaean masses in general.
The unparallelled eagerness of the White race to accept Christ is not easily explained. Our people converted so wholeheartedly we called our lands Christendom, and we never looked back to the other gods as we had in the past. The pagans and wiccans of today are more LARP than genuine faith in real beings.
You don't see a wave of fervent non-white evangelists sweeping across the brown lands to bring the good news to all their brethren near and far. The non-whites need a constantly replenished supply of missionaries to keep the teaching consistent and stop them going back to false gods or making some weird polytheistic amalgamation.
Ancient Israelite DNA is White:
> the Y chromosome in the man belongs to the J2 haplogroup, a group of closely-related DNA sequences that is believed to have originated in the Caucasus or Eastern Anatolia
Modern jews have Canaanite DNA:
> researchers have already mapped the DNA of ancient Canaanites, showing that they had a strong ancestral connection to modern-day Jewish and Arab populations.
Quick, interpret this as talmudically as possible!
> If researchers gather more data confirming that most Israelites indeed shared this ancestry with the Canaanites, it would support something that experts have strongly suspected for a while, that in fact the ancient Hebrews descended from the Canaanites.
1. Everyone knows jews are the ancient Israelites (because jews say so).
2. Uh-oh, turns out modern jews actually have Canaanite DNA, not the distinct DNA of Abraham's origins in Ur.
3. Um, uh... the ancient Israelites must have merely split off from the Canaanites - Abraham, the Exodus, etc. never happened!
This right here is why I dont trust the Soyence of the past century. "Some people pretending to jews have been proven to actually be genetically related the enemies of the real Hebrews, and instead of entertaining the possibility that they might be frauds, we will instead claim that the ancient Hebrews were actually their enemies, despite the fact that all historical sources from antiquity pointing to the Hebrews *not* being native to the Levant."
It's a mistake to read "jew" in your Bible and think this automatically means "Israelite", just like "American" doesn't mean "White".
Archaeology and history are not hard science; it's subject to politics and muh racisms just like everything else, and this determines what interpretations are publicly acceptable, even if that means picking the least plausible explanation (as with this We Wuz Izraelitez example).
Conveniently, many non-White cultures have taboos about disturbing the dead, so it can be offensive to use modern tech to definitively prove that these ancient remains really are are the ancestors of whoever happens to live there more recently.
This is doubly true when artifacts from thousands of years ago are suspiciously superior by far to anything made by their "descendants" many centuries later.
More evidence for the theory that the lost tribes carried off by the Assyrians went North.
Yes, they essentially believe the northern ten tribes were taken away and then totally poofed out of existence as identifiable peoples without leaving any traces (just like the ashes from the holobunga).
They also seem to selectively forget that the promise was passed very explicitly to Isaac and then Jacob, with Ishmael and Esau being rejected. If descent from Abraham alone was sufficient, the arabs and Edomites would also be God's Chosen People™ alongside the jews.
It is hard to argue against this because everything is reframed as "spiritual". When one of the New Testament writers accidentally does a racism, this is overlooked or downplayed as only being for that time or not a full understanding or whatever - see Paul writing about his empathy for his literal blood kinsmen instead of caring about all of the Judaean masses in general.
The unparallelled eagerness of the White race to accept Christ is not easily explained. Our people converted so wholeheartedly we called our lands Christendom, and we never looked back to the other gods as we had in the past. The pagans and wiccans of today are more LARP than genuine faith in real beings.
You don't see a wave of fervent non-white evangelists sweeping across the brown lands to bring the good news to all their brethren near and far. The non-whites need a constantly replenished supply of missionaries to keep the teaching consistent and stop them going back to false gods or making some weird polytheistic amalgamation.