You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 year ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)1 child
Maybe it's simply a side effect of security.
A hundred years ago, when food for a week pretty much cost a weeks pay, women wouldn't dream of pulling this crap (except maybe the rich ones). Men were needed to provide and protect them and women fully expected to be taking care of the home and kids, and were lucky if they got the opportunity.
Now, there's so much excess wealth that they can survive easily on part time jobs and sexual favours for rent, so they don't need men.
I mean, they're also all miserable, but you can't expect women to act in their own interest.
That makes a lot of sense. It would also make sense as to why the government is trying to be the husband to so many women, because it buys them forever power eventually.
A hundred years ago, when food for a week pretty much cost a weeks pay, women wouldn't dream of pulling this crap (except maybe the rich ones). Men were needed to provide and protect them and women fully expected to be taking care of the home and kids, and were lucky if they got the opportunity.
Now, there's so much excess wealth that they can survive easily on part time jobs and sexual favours for rent, so they don't need men.
I mean, they're also all miserable, but you can't expect women to act in their own interest.