1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Some people here are retarded, their thought process goes: nothing ever happens… if it does it’s a psyop… if it isn’t the guy‘s a grifter… if he isn’t he’s controlled opposition… if he isn’t he is a jude and on-and-on.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn’t. I prefer taking things at face value, and to me it seems most people that think like that are just paranoid or have a case of the Debbie Downer’s.
> most people that think like that are just paranoid or have a case of the Debbie Downer’s.
Some people are that way, sure. But the reason I personally believe there's a coordinated campaign is that when I ask them to name one person who is "pure" and doesn't get these labels, none of them answer me. I've probably asked a dozen times.
Them: "don't listen to this guy! He's [label]"
Me: "okay! then give me an example of someone who doesn't get called [label]"
(What I expect, if these people are sincere) Them: "check out [person] on [website]! You'll love em!"
(What I get, without fail) Them: "fUcK yOu! gO aHEad anD licK thE boOts of a [label] goyIm!!!"
Maybe, I don’t think so. I reckon it’s because these people aren’t interested in learning or spreading the message - so when you ask them that, they run a blank; they genuinely don’t know.
1 year ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It disproves what he said by demonstrating that it’s all he’s able to say.
If you go to eat some food and someone screams, “don’t eat that! It’s poisonous!” So you select something else and again they scream “that’s poisonous too!”
If this goes on long enough, you’d be justified in wondering if this person has ulterior motives. But how can you tell?
Simple: you ask them to point to something that **isn’t poisonous** - if they won’t do that (and notice that the guy above won’t answer my challenge) then you’re justified in telling him to fuck off.
>If this goes on long enough, you’d be justified in wondering if this person has ulterior motives. But how can you tell?
Go ahead, then. Eat the food. Enjoy white genocide.
>you ask them to point to something that isn’t poisonous
THERE ISN’T ANY, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER. You don’t get ANY amount of political, social, or economic power in the West without worshipping jews. It isn’t physically possible. You cannot do it. You get executed by the Mossad if you do. ***Wake the absolute fuck up.***
>if they won’t do that (and notice that the guy above won’t answer my challenge)
People have to sleep, you know.
>justified
How about *you* find a single instance, since it’s *your* claim, then. Post a name. Just one. A single name.
“Accuse our enemies of working for us, then their own side won’t trust them”
Is that not an obvious tactic?
Some people are that way, sure. But the reason I personally believe there's a coordinated campaign is that when I ask them to name one person who is "pure" and doesn't get these labels, none of them answer me. I've probably asked a dozen times.
Them: "don't listen to this guy! He's [label]"
Me: "okay! then give me an example of someone who doesn't get called [label]"
(What I expect, if these people are sincere) Them: "check out [person] on [website]! You'll love em!"
(What I get, without fail) Them: "fUcK yOu! gO aHEad anD licK thE boOts of a [label] goyIm!!!"
Sieg heil brother!
If you go to eat some food and someone screams, “don’t eat that! It’s poisonous!” So you select something else and again they scream “that’s poisonous too!”
If this goes on long enough, you’d be justified in wondering if this person has ulterior motives. But how can you tell?
Simple: you ask them to point to something that **isn’t poisonous** - if they won’t do that (and notice that the guy above won’t answer my challenge) then you’re justified in telling him to fuck off.
Go ahead, then. Eat the food. Enjoy white genocide.
>you ask them to point to something that isn’t poisonous
THERE ISN’T ANY, YOU STUPID MOTHERFUCKER. You don’t get ANY amount of political, social, or economic power in the West without worshipping jews. It isn’t physically possible. You cannot do it. You get executed by the Mossad if you do. ***Wake the absolute fuck up.***
>if they won’t do that (and notice that the guy above won’t answer my challenge)
People have to sleep, you know.
>justified
How about *you* find a single instance, since it’s *your* claim, then. Post a name. Just one. A single name.
You won’t do it.
A single instance of what? lol you have completely forgotten what we’re even talking about!
>gets called out on it
>LOL WHAT U TALK ABOUT
Thanks for admitting that Elon Musk is not against the jews in any way, shape, or form. Fuck off.