Christianity makes people soft
(communities.win)
Wrong. Fasting, self-discipline, self-restraint and self-control makes people stronger.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
92 comments:
Nothing in that religion teaches people to be strong. It’s all about being a passive good goy.
Christians are more similar to jews than I am.
I call for the total extermination of israel and all kikes. You want to pray and cuck all day to secure your afterlife because you’re a coward.
I call for the total extermination of israel and all kikes. You want to pray and cuck all day to secure your afterlife because you’re a coward.
> False, Christ was the antithesis to ancient Judaism, which developed into modern day Judaism
Meh. Not even. He flipped over some debt collector tables? Who gives a fuck.
Emperor Titus was a bigger hero. Adolf Hitler was a bigger hero.
> Why do you want to destroy Israel if it doesn’t matter and there’s no afterlife? Why struggle?
What a soy thing to think, as if self determination doesn’t exist. You’re admitting that you’re a sheep that needs external guidance and can’t just want to do something because of your own personal beliefs or desires.
Meh. Not even. He flipped over some debt collector tables? Who gives a fuck.
Emperor Titus was a bigger hero. Adolf Hitler was a bigger hero.
> Why do you want to destroy Israel if it doesn’t matter and there’s no afterlife? Why struggle?
What a soy thing to think, as if self determination doesn’t exist. You’re admitting that you’re a sheep that needs external guidance and can’t just want to do something because of your own personal beliefs or desires.
>Christ was the antithesis to ancient Judaism,
Theres no such thing as "Ancient Judaism", at least not in relation the modern Babylonian and Canaanite occultism that calls itself Judaism, but otherwise I agree with your point. The term "Judaism" itself is actually only 500 years old, the Ancient Hebrews wouldnt have called their religion that.
Theres no such thing as "Ancient Judaism", at least not in relation the modern Babylonian and Canaanite occultism that calls itself Judaism, but otherwise I agree with your point. The term "Judaism" itself is actually only 500 years old, the Ancient Hebrews wouldnt have called their religion that.
Wrong again.
Prove it.
Why? What would be the point? You already have your mind made up. Even if we showed you 100% without a doubt proof that Jesus is the way, you still wouldn't accept Him and become a Christian.
No, the *rejection* of Christianity is what makes people soft. When the west was proudly and uncompromisingly Christian, the jews were met with violence every time they tried to push their Satanic poison. With the (((Liberalization))) and de-Christianization of society, the west has softened and forgotten its past. It is Liberalism and Humanism, themselves a rejection of Christianity, that form the basis for the cultural rot in the west that the jews have exploited to seize power.
> When the west was proudly and uncompromisingly Christian, the jews were met with violence every time they tried to push their Satanic poison
Wrong. That was nationalism and love for the people. Christianity is not a fighting mindset.
> With the (((Liberalization))) and de-Christianization of society, the west has softened and forgotten its past. It is Liberalism and Humanism, themselves a rejection of Christianity, that form the basis for the cultural rot in the west that the jews have exploited to seize power.
Actually that’s was just because it was a weak belief system and got taken over by parasites. A strong belief system would teach a vehement anti-jew, anti-invader, anti-degeneracy offensive mindset. Not this soy mindset that makes faggots like AnacondaTorment
Wrong. That was nationalism and love for the people. Christianity is not a fighting mindset.
> With the (((Liberalization))) and de-Christianization of society, the west has softened and forgotten its past. It is Liberalism and Humanism, themselves a rejection of Christianity, that form the basis for the cultural rot in the west that the jews have exploited to seize power.
Actually that’s was just because it was a weak belief system and got taken over by parasites. A strong belief system would teach a vehement anti-jew, anti-invader, anti-degeneracy offensive mindset. Not this soy mindset that makes faggots like AnacondaTorment
>wrong. That was
Thanks for instantaneously admitting it’s not wrong because you can’t refute that it happened and that the people explicitly cited their Christian faith as the reason. Commit suicide.
Thanks for instantaneously admitting it’s not wrong because you can’t refute that it happened and that the people explicitly cited their Christian faith as the reason. Commit suicide.
> That was nationalism and love for the people.
Which is a fundamental teaching of Christianity, love of brother is second to love of God. It was not until Liberal Humanism (which is the belief in Universal Brotherhood without the belief in God ) began to replace actual doctrine in the seminaries that fake Christians began abandoning what was a central understanding of the human condition.
>Christianity is not a fighting mindset
The Church has always called Herself the Army of God. Any Church that isnt in a fighting mindset isnt a Church at all, its a synagogue.
>Actually that’s was just because it was a weak belief system and got taken over by parasites.
Weak belief systems dont resist ideological drift for 2 millenia and subjugate the entire world. Not even Islam at its height has the reach Christianity achieved before the west committed apostasy and began its suicide dive. Christianity can survive without the west but the west cannot survive without Christianity, unless you considering being raped by muzzies and jews and having your culture utterly annihilated by them as a form of surival.
Which is a fundamental teaching of Christianity, love of brother is second to love of God. It was not until Liberal Humanism (which is the belief in Universal Brotherhood without the belief in God ) began to replace actual doctrine in the seminaries that fake Christians began abandoning what was a central understanding of the human condition.
>Christianity is not a fighting mindset
The Church has always called Herself the Army of God. Any Church that isnt in a fighting mindset isnt a Church at all, its a synagogue.
>Actually that’s was just because it was a weak belief system and got taken over by parasites.
Weak belief systems dont resist ideological drift for 2 millenia and subjugate the entire world. Not even Islam at its height has the reach Christianity achieved before the west committed apostasy and began its suicide dive. Christianity can survive without the west but the west cannot survive without Christianity, unless you considering being raped by muzzies and jews and having your culture utterly annihilated by them as a form of surival.
109 countries and counting, rabbi.
Stop writing walls of text like a leftist woman you faggot. Nobody cares.
1 billion Christians in the world and none of them do anything. The supposed “based” ones here just sit around making excuses all day. Spare me the bullshit soyboy.
1 billion Christians in the world and none of them do anything. The supposed “based” ones here just sit around making excuses all day. Spare me the bullshit soyboy.
>I deliberately made a spam thread and someone took the time to reply
>how could this be happening to me
Yep, enjoy your ban.
>how could this be happening to me
Yep, enjoy your ban.
I agree with you. I'm not a fan of the distinction Right-Wingers like to make about "real" Christianity and "modern Christianity". Outside of the internet, I have never met a self-described Christian I didn't think was "soft". The stuff the average Christian is "tough" on is generally trivial in the grand scheme of things also.
Better to drop Christianity altogether and create something better, imo.
Better to drop Christianity altogether and create something better, imo.
> I agree with you. I'm not a fan of the distinction Right-Wingers like to make about "real" Christianity and "modern Christianity".
Do you see how they just constantly make excuses? Not a single one actually admits that there could be a problem with their mindset. The weakness of an inflexible belief system is that they have no way to deal with changing situations. This makes them predictable and easy to beat.
> The stuff the average Christian is "tough" on is generally trivial in the grand scheme of things also.
What has Christianity even preserved in the US?
I see protests against LGBT faggotry in schools, and its almost always immigrant Muslims. Where the hell are the Christians? Oh right.. hanging up pride flags outside the church. Shameful.
> Better to drop Christianity altogether and create something better, imo.
Thats literally all I'm saying. Agreed.
Do you see how they just constantly make excuses? Not a single one actually admits that there could be a problem with their mindset. The weakness of an inflexible belief system is that they have no way to deal with changing situations. This makes them predictable and easy to beat.
> The stuff the average Christian is "tough" on is generally trivial in the grand scheme of things also.
What has Christianity even preserved in the US?
I see protests against LGBT faggotry in schools, and its almost always immigrant Muslims. Where the hell are the Christians? Oh right.. hanging up pride flags outside the church. Shameful.
> Better to drop Christianity altogether and create something better, imo.
Thats literally all I'm saying. Agreed.
What you described is why Christians are so weak. They're flexible in things they shouldn't be flexible on and inflexible on things they should be flexible on. It's a joke. The highest quality people I've ever met tend to say something like: "I believe in God but I don't like organized religion" or something to that extent. It's a tell for the fact they realize religion in its current form is trash.
Christianity does not actually have a good purpose for White people now. We can do better.
Christianity does not actually have a good purpose for White people now. We can do better.
> Like Israel, I have a right to defend myself.
Read the comments by faggot /u/AnacondasTorment and tell me I’m wrong lmao.
Read the comments by faggot /u/AnacondasTorment and tell me I’m wrong lmao.
That must explain how it survived for 2,000 years. Because it's so weak and soft and unable to defend itself.
Has it really survived though? Because I constantly hear people say how modern Christianity isn't the same, and how people have strayed away from it.
What survived? Why do I see pride flags on so many churches? Why do I see churches helping import niggers into white areas? Why do I see christians cucking for israel? Why don't I see a single christian country that isn't jew owned?
What survived? Why do I see pride flags on so many churches? Why do I see churches helping import niggers into white areas? Why do I see christians cucking for israel? Why don't I see a single christian country that isn't jew owned?
Jesus never said it was going to be easy. In fact, he told lots of people that they were going to be killed for following Him. The only thing He said was that the gates of Hell were not going to *prevail* against us. No critique of Christianity that you can make cannot also be said of White people. Non-religious White people are every bit as jew-influenced as Christian White people. I don't see a single White country that isn't jew-owned either. In fact, by that reasoning one could say that White people are soft and weak, and that they are a failed race. But that is, like you are, ignoring the obvious; the international jew. Therefore it is not a Christian problem, or a White problem, but a jew problem. The fact that the jews have sunk such an *enormous* amount of resources into subverting the Christian faith ought to tell you everything you need to know. The fact that the #1 spot of jew hatred is occupied by both Whites and Christians ought to tell you everything you need to know.
My point is any belief system we’re going to adopt to fight back needs to be extreme.
> he told lots of people that they were going to be killed for following Him
For example, I would never tell people that they might be killed for following a path. I’d them that they would need to kill if they want to survive. Killing your enemy is how you win. Accepting that you may die for a belief is too passive and frankly “soft”.
> by that reasoning one could say that White people are soft and weak
There’s actually some merit to thinking this. Not as a tool to demoralize, but instead as a personal assessment of flaws or weaknesses.
In the “white nationalist” movement there has been recognition of whites being susceptible to attacks against their empathy and compassion which allow parasites and invaders (kikes, jeets, etc.) to take advantage of them. A belief system needs to account for these weaknesses and help the individual prepare adequately to combat them.
A belief system needs to help train whites to be able to suppress their natural empathy so they’re not affected by the subversive psychological warfare that has saturated the west by evil kikes.
These are things that are wholly lacking in the Bible or any modern religion to be honest. These are problems of today that are not going to be solved from a belief system like Christianity.
> The fact that the jews have sunk such an enormous amount of resources into subverting the Christian faith ought to tell you everything you need to know.
It tells me that jews hate Christianity, but just because something is hated by them doesn’t mean that it’s an effective weapon. Or rather, that there isn’t a better “weapon” out there. My observation is that Christianity as a weapon has proven to be ineffective, we need new tools to fight this adversary.
Christians need not necessarily discard their religion, one can have personal spiritual beliefs that they follow and that’s completely fine and dandy. But for fucks sake stop trying use it as the solution to the jewish problem. It isn’t one. Keep your religion separate from your fighting mindset, or adopt a new religion that is wholly a fighting mindset.
> he told lots of people that they were going to be killed for following Him
For example, I would never tell people that they might be killed for following a path. I’d them that they would need to kill if they want to survive. Killing your enemy is how you win. Accepting that you may die for a belief is too passive and frankly “soft”.
> by that reasoning one could say that White people are soft and weak
There’s actually some merit to thinking this. Not as a tool to demoralize, but instead as a personal assessment of flaws or weaknesses.
In the “white nationalist” movement there has been recognition of whites being susceptible to attacks against their empathy and compassion which allow parasites and invaders (kikes, jeets, etc.) to take advantage of them. A belief system needs to account for these weaknesses and help the individual prepare adequately to combat them.
A belief system needs to help train whites to be able to suppress their natural empathy so they’re not affected by the subversive psychological warfare that has saturated the west by evil kikes.
These are things that are wholly lacking in the Bible or any modern religion to be honest. These are problems of today that are not going to be solved from a belief system like Christianity.
> The fact that the jews have sunk such an enormous amount of resources into subverting the Christian faith ought to tell you everything you need to know.
It tells me that jews hate Christianity, but just because something is hated by them doesn’t mean that it’s an effective weapon. Or rather, that there isn’t a better “weapon” out there. My observation is that Christianity as a weapon has proven to be ineffective, we need new tools to fight this adversary.
Christians need not necessarily discard their religion, one can have personal spiritual beliefs that they follow and that’s completely fine and dandy. But for fucks sake stop trying use it as the solution to the jewish problem. It isn’t one. Keep your religion separate from your fighting mindset, or adopt a new religion that is wholly a fighting mindset.
>My point is any belief system we’re going to adopt to fight back needs to be extreme.
Christianity *was* pretty extreme, in its own right.
>Accepting that you may die for a belief is too passive and frankly “soft”.
It's the same thing. Would you die for your people?
>There’s actually some merit to thinking this. Not as a tool to demoralize, but instead as a personal assessment of flaws or weaknesses.
Ah OK, when it's against something you favor it's a tool for personal assessment of flaws, but when it's against something you do not favor it's an irreconcilable fault.
>A belief system needs to account for these weaknesses and help the individual prepare adequately to combat them.
Correct. Christianity *used* to do just that.
>A belief system needs to help train whites to be able to suppress their natural empathy so they’re not affected by the subversive psychological warfare that has saturated the west by evil kikes.
Christian crusaders used to slaughter entire cities of muslims during the crusades, is that good enough for you?
>These are things that are wholly lacking in the Bible or any modern religion to be honest.
Like it or not, the Bible is very markedly *incomplete*. As good as it is, the Bible itself is not the sum total of the Christian Faith. It even says so itself at the end of the Gospel of John. When Jesus ascended into Heaven, His work on earth was just getting *started*, not just finishing. This modern aberration of *sola scriptura* is exactly how we ended up in the mess we are in now in the first place, and said modern mess is the single greatest proof that ignoring history and tradition will not get you anywhere good in the long run.
>These are problems of today that are not going to be solved from a belief system like Christianity.
The basic explanation is that the Christianity you see around you today simply *IS NOT CHRISTIANITY*. You probably get tired of hearing that because you know nothing else (I'd wager to guess that you have never been a Christian or if you once were, a member of a modernist denomination), but it really is true. I'll tell you what, I'll give you a chance to completely prove me wrong. Read the book *The Sword of Christ* by Giles Corey, and then come back and tell me your mind isn't changed.
>It tells me that jews hate Christianity, but just because something is hated by them doesn’t mean that it’s an effective weapon
\>If a comrade of ours opens a jewish newspaper in the morning and does not find himself vilified there, then he has wasted the previous day, for if he had achieved something he would be persecuted, slandered, derided, and abused. Those who effectively combat this mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks...Every calumny and falsehood published by the jews are honorable scars borne by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend
--Adolf Hitler, *Mein Kampf*, the Stalag translation, page 306.
>My observation is that Christianity as a weapon has proven to be ineffective
Even if Christianity has been a failure in the last 200 years, that's still only a *tenth* of the time it's been on this earth and followed by White people. Name me something else that's lasted that long, then.
>we need new tools to fight this adversary.
No, we simply need to return Christianity to its former glory.
>or adopt a new religion that is wholly a fighting mindset.
https://files.catbox.moe/7mkg56.mp4
Christianity *was* pretty extreme, in its own right.
>Accepting that you may die for a belief is too passive and frankly “soft”.
It's the same thing. Would you die for your people?
>There’s actually some merit to thinking this. Not as a tool to demoralize, but instead as a personal assessment of flaws or weaknesses.
Ah OK, when it's against something you favor it's a tool for personal assessment of flaws, but when it's against something you do not favor it's an irreconcilable fault.
>A belief system needs to account for these weaknesses and help the individual prepare adequately to combat them.
Correct. Christianity *used* to do just that.
>A belief system needs to help train whites to be able to suppress their natural empathy so they’re not affected by the subversive psychological warfare that has saturated the west by evil kikes.
Christian crusaders used to slaughter entire cities of muslims during the crusades, is that good enough for you?
>These are things that are wholly lacking in the Bible or any modern religion to be honest.
Like it or not, the Bible is very markedly *incomplete*. As good as it is, the Bible itself is not the sum total of the Christian Faith. It even says so itself at the end of the Gospel of John. When Jesus ascended into Heaven, His work on earth was just getting *started*, not just finishing. This modern aberration of *sola scriptura* is exactly how we ended up in the mess we are in now in the first place, and said modern mess is the single greatest proof that ignoring history and tradition will not get you anywhere good in the long run.
>These are problems of today that are not going to be solved from a belief system like Christianity.
The basic explanation is that the Christianity you see around you today simply *IS NOT CHRISTIANITY*. You probably get tired of hearing that because you know nothing else (I'd wager to guess that you have never been a Christian or if you once were, a member of a modernist denomination), but it really is true. I'll tell you what, I'll give you a chance to completely prove me wrong. Read the book *The Sword of Christ* by Giles Corey, and then come back and tell me your mind isn't changed.
>It tells me that jews hate Christianity, but just because something is hated by them doesn’t mean that it’s an effective weapon
\>If a comrade of ours opens a jewish newspaper in the morning and does not find himself vilified there, then he has wasted the previous day, for if he had achieved something he would be persecuted, slandered, derided, and abused. Those who effectively combat this mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks...Every calumny and falsehood published by the jews are honorable scars borne by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend
--Adolf Hitler, *Mein Kampf*, the Stalag translation, page 306.
>My observation is that Christianity as a weapon has proven to be ineffective
Even if Christianity has been a failure in the last 200 years, that's still only a *tenth* of the time it's been on this earth and followed by White people. Name me something else that's lasted that long, then.
>we need new tools to fight this adversary.
No, we simply need to return Christianity to its former glory.
>or adopt a new religion that is wholly a fighting mindset.
https://files.catbox.moe/7mkg56.mp4
Toast message
The Crusades alone proves you wrong.
Oh yeah the singular time they actually did something. But let’s conveniently ignore the next thousand years of losing.
You’re not a serious account. Reported for spam.
Bye Felicia